Table 3 Vehicle counting results.
From: An Efficient and Robust Moving Shadow Removal Algorithm and Its Applications in ITS
Testing videos | Compared methods | Lane1 | Lane2 | Lane3 | Lane4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Average Accuracy rate) | (Average Accuracy rate) | (Average Accuracy rate) | (Average Accuracy rate) | ||
Video1 | Without Shadow Removal | 81.58% | 97.50% | 96.57% | 82.29% |
With Proposed Algorithm | 100% | 99.02% | 97.22% | 100% | |
Video2 | Without Shadow Removal | 92.88% | 96.27% | 95.55% | 89.51% |
With Proposed Algorithm | 97.59% | 99.31% | 99.68% | 99.26% | |
Video3 | Without Shadow Removal | 95.16% | 97.14% | — | — |
With Proposed Algorithm | 100% | 100% | — | — |