Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of localization performance on the simulated dataset

From: Reliable urban vehicle localization under faulty satellite navigation signals

  

Few faults

Many faults

(5, 1)

(5, 2)

(7, 4)

(10, 6)

KF-RAIM

RMSE(m)

7.6

21.5

34.3

34.4

\(\%{>}15\) m

5.9

68.7

87.4

91.1

J-PF

RMSE(m)

\(\mathbf {4.8}\)

\(\mathbf {5.8}\)

33.5

22.9

\(\%{>}15\) m

\(\mathbf {1.2}\)

\(\mathbf {3.1}\)

94.2

85.4

Ours

RMSE(m)

11.0

12.4

\(\mathbf {13.2}\)

\(\mathbf {12.4}\)

\(\%{>}15\) m

23.4

26.6

\(\mathbf {33.1}\)

\(\mathbf {28.7}\)

  1. The dataset consists of varying total number of measurements and maximum number of measurement faults (total # of measurements, max # of faults). Our approach demonstrates better localization performance in scenarios with large number of faults in comparison with J-PF and KF-RAIM. Bold values indicate the best performance in each category