Open Access

Effects of Digital Filtering in Data Processing of Seismic Acceleration Records

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing20072007:029502

https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/29502

Received: 12 April 2006

Accepted: 24 November 2006

Published: 23 January 2007

Abstract

The paper presents an application of digital filtering in data processing of acceleration records from earthquakes. Butterworth, Chebyshev, and Bessel filters with different orders are considered to eliminate the frequency noise. A dataset under investigation includes accelerograms from three stations, located in Turkey (Dinar, Izmit, Kusadasi), all working with an analogue type of seismograph SMA-1. Records from near-source stations to the earthquakes (i.e., with a distance to the epicenter less than 20 km) with different moment magnitudes , 6.4, and 7.4 have been examined. We have evaluated the influence of the type of digital filter on time series (acceleration, velocity, displacement), on some strong motion parameters (PGA, PGV, PGD, etc.), and on the FAS (Fourier amplitude spectrum) of acceleration. Several -damped displacement response spectra applying examined filtering techniques with different filter orders have been shown. SeismoSignal software tool has been used during the examples.

[12345678910111213141516]

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Computer-Aided Engineering, University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy

References

  1. Darragh B, Silva W, Gregor N: Strong motion record processing for the PEER centre. Proceedings of COSMOS Invited Workshop on Strong-Motion Record Processing, May 2004, Richmond, Calif, USA http://www.cosmos-eq.org/recordProcessingPapers.htmlGoogle Scholar
  2. Shakal AF, Huang MJ, Graizer VM: CSMIP strong-motion data processing. Proceedings of COSMOS Invited Workshop on Strong-Motion Record Processing, May 2004, Richmond, Calif, USA http://www.cosmos-eq.org/recordProcessingPapers.htmlGoogle Scholar
  3. Rinaldis D: Aquisition and processing of analogue and digital accelerometric records: ENEA methodology and experience from Italian earthquakes. Proceedings of COSMOS Invited Workshop on Strong-Motion Record Processing, May 2004, Richmond, Calif, USA http://www.cosmos-eq.org/recordProcessingPapers.htmlGoogle Scholar
  4. Internet Site of the European Strong-Motion Database http://www.isesd.cv.ic.ac.uk
  5. Boore DM, Akkar S: Effect of causal and acausal filters on elastic and inelastic response spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003,32(11):1729-1748. 10.1002/eqe.299View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Boore DM: On pads and filters: processing strong-motion data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2005,95(2):745-750. 10.1785/0120040160View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Boore DM, Bommer JJ: Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2005,25(2):93-115. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.10.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Bazzurro P, Sjoberg B, Luco N, Silva W, Darragh R: Effects of strong motion processing procedures on time histories, elastic and inelastic spectra. Proceedings of COSMOS Invited Workshop on Strong-Motion Record Processing, May 2004, Richmond, Calif, USA http://www.cosmos-eq.org/recordProcessingPapers.htmlGoogle Scholar
  9. Pazos A, González MJ, Alguacil G: Non-linear filter, using the wavelet transform, applied to seismological records. Journal of Seismology 2003,7(4):413-429.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Scherbaum F: Of Poles and Zeros: Fundamentals of Digital Seismology. 2nd edition. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 2000.Google Scholar
  11. SeismoSignal - a computer program for signal processing of strong-motion data 2004.http://www.seismosoft.com ver.3.1.0,
  12. Plesinger A, Zmeskal M, Zednik J: Automated Preprocessing of Digital Seismograms - Principles and Software. Prague-Golden, Prague, Czech Republic; 1996:173.Google Scholar
  13. Converse AM, Brady AG: BAP: basic strong-motion accelerogram processing software; ver.1.0. In Open-File Report 92-296A. U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colo, USA; 1992:178.Google Scholar
  14. Zaré M, Bard P-Y: Strong motion dataset of Turkey: data processing and site classification. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2002,22(8):703-718. 10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00028-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Rinaldis D, Menu JMH, Goula X: A study of various uncorrected versions of the same ground acceleration signal. Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering (ECEE '86), September 1986, Lisbon, Portugal 7: 1-8.Google Scholar
  16. Boore DM: Effect of baseline corrections on displacements and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2001,91(5):1199-1211.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mollova 2007