Open Access

Transcoding-Based Error-Resilient Video Adaptation for 3G Wireless Networks

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing20072007:039586

https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/39586

Received: 2 October 2006

Accepted: 13 May 2007

Published: 8 July 2007

Abstract

Transcoding is an effective method to provide video adaptation for heterogeneous internetwork video access and communication environments, which require the tailoring (i.e., repurposing) of coded video properties to channel conditions, terminal capabilities, and user preferences. This paper presents a video transcoding system that is capable of applying a suite of error resilience tools on the input compressed video streams while controlling the output rates to provide robust communications over error-prone and bandwidth-limited 3G wireless networks. The transcoder is also designed to employ a new adaptive intra-refresh algorithm, which is responsive to the detected scene activity inherently embedded into the video content and the reported time-varying channel error conditions of the wireless network. Comprehensive computer simulations demonstrate significant improvements in the received video quality performances using the new transcoding architecture without an extra computational cost.

[1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041]

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
NEC Electronics (Europe) GmbH, Cygnus House
(2)
I-Lab, Centre for Communication Systems Research (CCSR), University of Surrey

References

  1. Chang S-F, Vetro A: Video adaptation: concepts, technologies, and open issues. Proceedings of the IEEE 2005,93(1):148-158.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Special Issue on Universal Multimedia Access IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2003.,20(2):Google Scholar
  3. Special Issue on Multimedia Adaptation Signal Processing: Image Communication 2003.,18(8):Google Scholar
  4. MPEG-21—Part-7: ISO/IEC 21000-7 : Information technology—multimedia framework—part 7: Digital Item Adaptation. 2004.Google Scholar
  5. Bormans J, Gelissen J, Perkis A: MPEG-21: the 21st century multimedia framework. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2003,20(2):53-62. 10.1109/MSP.2003.1184339View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnett I, van de Walle R, Hill K, Bormans J, Pereira F: MPEG-21: goals and achievements. IEEE Multimedia 2003,10(4):60-70. 10.1109/MMUL.2003.1237551View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Vetro A: MPEG-21 digital item adaptation: enabling universal multimedia access. IEEE Multimedia 2004,11(1):84-87. 10.1109/MMUL.2004.1261111View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Magalhães J, Pereira F: Using MPEG standards for multimedia customization. Signal Processing: Image Communication 2004,19(5):437-456. 10.1016/j.image.2004.02.004Google Scholar
  9. Warabino T, Ota S, Morikawa D, et al.: Video transcoding proxy for 3G wireless mobile Internet access. IEEE Communications Magazine 2000,38(10):66-71. 10.1109/35.874971View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Dogan S, Eminsoy S, Sadka AH, Kondoz AM: Personalised multimedia services for real-time video over 3G mobile networks. Proceedings of the 3rd IEE International Conference on 3G Mobile Communication Technologies (3G '02), May 2002, London, UK (489):366-370.Google Scholar
  11. Lei Z, Georganas ND: Video transcoding gateway for wireless video access. Proceedings of IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE '03), May 2003, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 3: 1775-1778.Google Scholar
  12. Amir E, McCanne S, Katz R: An active service framework and its application to real-time multimedia transcoding. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication (SIGCOMM '98), August-September 1998, Vancouver, BC, Canada 178-189.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Ott M, Welling G, Mathur S, Reininger D, Izmailov R: The JOURNEY active network model. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 2001,19(3):527-537. 10.1109/49.917712View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. 3GPP: TR 30.03 : Selection procedures for the choice of radio transmission technologies of the UMTS. V3.2.0 1998-04Google Scholar
  15. Holma H, Toskala A: WCDMA for UMTS: Radio Access for Third Generation Mobile Communications. 3rd edition. John Wiley & Sons, London, UK; 2004.Google Scholar
  16. Kodikara C, Worrall S, Sadka AH, Kondoz AM: Performance enhancement of real-time video communications over UTRAN by adaptive resource allocation: system level evaluation. Proceedings of the 5th IEE International Conference on 3G Mobile Communication Technologies (3G '04), October 2004, London, UK (503):427-431.Google Scholar
  17. MPEG-4—Part-2: ISO/IEC 14496-2 : Information technology—generic coding of audio-visual objects—part 2: visual. 2001.Google Scholar
  18. Talluri R: Error-resilient video coding in the ISO MPEG-4 standard. IEEE Communications Magazine 1998,36(6):112-119. 10.1109/35.685373View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Vetro A, Christopoulos C, Sun H: Video transcoding architectures and techniques: an overview. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2003,20(2):18-29. 10.1109/MSP.2003.1184336View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Xin J, Lin C-W, Sun M-T: Digital video transcoding. Proceedings of the IEEE 2005,93(1):84-97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ahmad I, Wei X, Sun Y, Zhang Y-Q: Video transcoding: an overview of various techniques and research issues. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 2005,7(5):793-804.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. de los Reyes G, Reibman AR, Chang S-F, Chuang JC-I: Error-resilient transcoding for video over wireless channels. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 2000,18(6):1063-1074. 10.1109/49.848256View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Dogan S, Cellatoglu A, Uyguroglu M, Sadka AH, Kondoz AM: Error-resilient video transcoding for robust internetwork communications using GPRS. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2002,12(6):453-464. 10.1109/TCSVT.2002.800308View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim IK, Cho NI, Nam J: Error resilient video transcoding based on the optimal multiple description of DCT coefficients. Proceedings of International Workshop on Advanced Image Technology (IWAIT '03), January 2003, Nagasaki, Japan 77-80.Google Scholar
  25. Eminsoy S, Dogan S, Kondoz AM: Real-time services for video communications. Proceedings of IEE International Conference on Visual Information Engineering (VIE '03), July 2003, Guildford, UK (495):262-265.Google Scholar
  26. Chiou H-J, Lee Y-R, Lin C-W: Error-resilient transcoding using adaptive intra refresh for video streaming. Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS '04), May 2004, Vancouver, BC, Canada 3: 777-780.Google Scholar
  27. Xia M, Vetro A, Sun H, Liu B: Rate-distortion optimized bit allocation for error resilient video transcoding. Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS '04), May 2004, Vancouver, BC, Canada 3: 945-948.Google Scholar
  28. Vetro A, Xin J, Sun H: Error resilience video trnscoding for wireless communications. IEEE Wireless Communications 2005,12(4):14-21. 10.1109/MWC.2005.1497854View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Chiou H-J, Lee Y-R, Lin C-W: Content-aware error-resilient transcoding using prioritized intra-refresh for video streaming. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 2005,16(4-5):563-588. 10.1016/j.jvcir.2004.11.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Dogan S, Sadka AH: Video transcoding for inter-network communications. In Compressed Video Communications by A. H. Sadka. John Wiley & Sons, London, UK; 2002:215-256. chapter 6Google Scholar
  31. TM5: ISO/IEC N0400 : Test model 5. 1993.Google Scholar
  32. Côté G, Kossentini F: Optimal intra coding of macroblocks for robust H.263 video communication over the Internet. Signal Processing: Image Communication 1999,15(1-2):25-34. 10.1016/S0923-5965(99)00022-3Google Scholar
  33. Liao JY, Villasenor J: Adaptive intra block update for robust transmission of H.263. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2000,10(1):30-35. 10.1109/76.825855View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Stuhlmüller K, Färber N, Link M, Girod B: Analysis of video transmission over lossy channels. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 2000,18(6):1012-1032. 10.1109/49.848253View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Chen C-H, Lee Y-R, Lin C-W, Chen Y-C: Error resilience transcoding using prioritized intra-refresh for video multicast over wireless networks. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME '05), July 2005, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 1310-1313.Google Scholar
  36. Chen C-M, Chen Y-C, Lin C-W: Error-resilience transcoding using content-aware intra-refresh based on profit tracing. Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS '06), May 2006, Kos, Greece 5283-5286.Google Scholar
  37. Worrall ST, Sadka AH, Kondoz AM, Sweeney P: Motion adaptive intra refresh for MPEG-4. Electronics Letters 2000,36(23):1924-1925. 10.1049/el:20001366View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. 3GPP: TS 25.853 : Delay budget within the access stratum. release 1999, March 2001Google Scholar
  39. Kodikara C, Worrall S, Fabri SN, Kondoz AM: Performance evaluation of MPEG-4 video telephony over UMTS. Proceedings of the 4th IEE International Conference on 3G Mobile Communication Technologies (3G '03), June 2003, London, UK (494):73-77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Soares LD, Adachi S, Pereira F: Influence of encoder parameters on the decoded video quality for MPEG-4 over W-CDMA mobile networks. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '00), September 2000, Vancouver, BC, Canada 2: 148-151.Google Scholar
  41. Kodikara C: Multimedia communications over 3G wireless communication systems, Ph.D. thesis. Electronic Engineering Department, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK; 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Eminsoy et al. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.