A Discriminative Model for Polyphonic Piano Transcription

1. 1.

   Moorer JA: On the transcription of musical sound by computer. Computer Music Journal 1977,1(4):32–38.

   • Google Scholar
2. 2.

   Rossi L, Girolami G, Leca M: Identification of polyphonic piano signals. Acustica 1997,83(6):1077–1084.

   • Google Scholar
3. 3.

   Sterian AD: Model-based segmentation of time-frequency images for musical transcription, Ph.D. thesis. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA; 1999.

   • Google Scholar
4. 4.

   Dixon S: On the computer recognition of solo piano music. Proceedings of Australasian Computer Music Conference, July 2000, Brisbane, Australia 31–37.

   • Google Scholar
5. 5.

   Bello JP, Daudet L, Sandler M: Time-domain polyphonic transcription using self-generating databases. Proceedings of the 112th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, May 2002, Munich, Germany

   • Google Scholar
6. 6.

   Klapuri A: A perceptually motivated multiple-f0 estimation method. Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA '05), October 2005, New Paltz, NY, USA

   • Google Scholar
7. 7.

   Ryynänen M, Klapuri A: Polyphonic music transcription using note event modeling. Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA '05), October 2005, New Paltz, NY, USA

   • Google Scholar
8. 8.

   Marolt M: A connectionist approach to automatic transcription of polyphonic piano music. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 2004,6(3):439–449. 10.1109/TMM.2004.827507

   • Article
   • Google Scholar
9. 9.

   Godsill S, Davy M: Bayesian harmonic models for musical pitch estimation and analysis. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP '02), May 2002, Orlando, Fla, USA 2: 1769–1772.

   • Google Scholar
10. 10.

    Cemgil AT, Kappen HJ, Barber D: A generative model for music transcription. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 2006,14(2):679–694.

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
11. 11.

    Kashino K, Godsill SJ: Bayesian estimation of simultaneous musical notes based on frequency domain modelling. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP '04), May 2004, Montreal, Que, Canada 4: 305–308.

    • Google Scholar
12. 12.

    Ellis DPW, Poliner GE: Classification-based melody transcription. to appear in Machine Learning, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-006-8373-9 to appear in Machine Learning,

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
13. 13.

    Platt J: Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization. In Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning. Edited by: Scholkopf B, Burges CJC, Smola AJ. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA; 1999:185–208.

    • Google Scholar
14. 14.

    Witten IH, Frank E: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, Calif, USA; 2000.

    • Google Scholar
15. 15.

    National Institute of Standards and Technology Spring 2004 (RT-04S) rich transcription meeting recognition evaluation plan, 2004. https://doi.org/nist.gov/speech/tests/rt/rt2004/spring/

16. 16.

    Taskar B, Guestrin C, Koller D: Max-margin Markov networks. Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems Conference (NIPS '03), December 2003, Vancouver, Canada

    • Google Scholar
17. 17.

    Schölkopf B, Platt JC, Shawe-Taylor J, Smola AJ, Williamson RC: Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution. Neural Computation 2001,13(7):1443–1471. 10.1162/089976601750264965

    • Article
    • Google Scholar

Download references