Skip to main content


We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research Article
  • Open Access

An Efficient Kernel Optimization Method for Radar High-Resolution Range Profile Recognition

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing20072007:049597

  • Received: 15 September 2006
  • Accepted: 5 April 2007
  • Published:


A kernel optimization method based on fusion kernel for high-resolution range profile (HRRP) is proposed in this paper. Based on the fusion of -norm and -norm Gaussian kernels, our method combines the different characteristics of them so that not only is the kernel function optimized but also the speckle fluctuations of HRRP are restrained. Then the proposed method is employed to optimize the kernel of kernel principle component analysis (KPCA) and the classification performance of extracted features is evaluated via support vector machines (SVMs) classifier. Finally, experimental results on the benchmark and radar-measured data sets are compared and analyzed to demonstrate the efficiency of our method.


  • Radar
  • Support Vector Machine
  • Information Technology
  • Support Vector
  • Kernel Function

Authors’ Affiliations

National Key Laboratory for Radar Signal Processing, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710071, China


  1. Chen B, Liu H, Bao Z: PCA and kernel PCA for radar high range resolution profiles recognition. Proceedings of IEEE International Radar Conference, May 2005, Arlington, Va, USA 528–533.Google Scholar
  2. Chen B, Liu H, Bao Z: An efficient kernel optimization method for high range resolution profile recognition. Proceedings of IEEE International Radar Conference, October 2006, Shanghai, China 1440–1443.Google Scholar
  3. Du L, Liu H, Bao Z, Xing M: Radar HRRP target recognition based on higher order spectra. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2005,53(7):2359-2368.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Du L, Liu H, Bao Z, Zhang J: A two-distribution compounded statistical model for radar HRRP target recognition. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2006,54(6):2226-2238.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Xiong H, Swamy MNS, Ahmad MO: Optimizing the kernel in the empirical feature space. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 2005,16(2):460-474. 10.1109/TNN.2004.841784View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Amari S, Wu S: Improving support vector machine classifiers by modifying kernel functions. Neural Networks 1999,12(6):783-789. 10.1016/S0893-6080(99)00032-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Vapnik V: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 1995.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Bao Z, Xing M, Wang T: Radar Imaging Technique. Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing, China; 2005.Google Scholar
  9. Schölkopf B, Mika S, Burges CJC, et al.: Input space versus feature space in kernel-based methods. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 1999,10(5):1000-1017. 10.1109/72.788641View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Shawe-Taylor J, Cristianini N: Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Ripley BD: Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1996.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Blake C, Keogh E, Merz CJ: UCI repository of machine learning databases. Department of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Calif, USA; 1998. Scholar
  13. Liu H, Bao Z: Radar HRR profiles recognition based on SVM with power-transformed-correlation kernel. Proceedings of International Symposium on Neural Networks (ISNN '04), August 2004, Dalian, China, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3173: 531–536.Google Scholar


© Bo Chen et al. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.