Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research Article
  • Open Access

Subspace-Based Noise Reduction for Speech Signals via Diagonal and Triangular Matrix Decompositions: Survey and Analysis

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing20072007:092953

https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/92953

  • Received: 1 October 2006
  • Accepted: 31 March 2007
  • Published:

Abstract

We survey the definitions and use of rank-revealing matrix decompositions in single-channel noise reduction algorithms for speech signals. Our algorithms are based on the rank-reduction paradigm and, in particular, signal subspace techniques. The focus is on practical working algorithms, using both diagonal (eigenvalue and singular value) decompositions and rank-revealing triangular decompositions (ULV, URV, VSV, ULLV, and ULLIV). In addition, we show how the subspace-based algorithms can be analyzed and compared by means of simple FIR filter interpretations. The algorithms are illustrated with working Matlab code and applications in speech processing.

Keywords

  • Information Technology
  • Quantum Information
  • Speech Signal
  • Noise Reduction
  • Triangular Matrix

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, Building 321, Lyngby, 2800, Denmark
(2)
Department of Electronic Systems, Aalborg University, Niels Jernes Vej 12, Aalborg, 9220, Denmark

References

  1. Doclo S, Moonen M: GSVD-based optimal filtering for single and multimicrophone speech enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2002,50(9):2230-2244. 10.1109/TSP.2002.801937Google Scholar
  2. Golub GH, Van Loan CF: Matrix Computations. 3rd edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md, USA; 1996.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Stewart GW: Matrix Algorithms. Volume 1: Basic Decompositions. SIAM Press, Philadelphia, Pa, USA; 1998.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Stewart GW: The decompositional approach to matrix computation. Computing in Science and Engineering 2000,2(1):50-59. 10.1109/5992.814658Google Scholar
  5. Scharf LL, Tufts DW: Rank reduction for modeling stationary signals. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1987,35(3):350-355. 10.1109/TASSP.1987.1165136Google Scholar
  6. Tufts DW, Kumaresan R: Singular value decomposition and improved frequency estimation using linear prediction. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1982,30(4):671-675. 10.1109/TASSP.1982.1163927Google Scholar
  7. Cadzow JA: Signal enhancement-a composite property mapping algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1988,36(1):49–62. 10.1109/29.1488MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. De Moor B: The singular value decomposition and long and short spaces of noisy matrices. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1993,41(9):2826-2838. 10.1109/78.236505MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Scharf LL: The SVD and reduced rank signal processing. Signal Processing 1991,25(2):113-133. 10.1016/0165-1684(91)90058-QMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Dendrinos M, Bakamidis S, Carayannis G: Speech enhancement from noise: a regenerative approach. Speech Communication 1991,10(1):45-57. 10.1016/0167-6393(91)90027-QGoogle Scholar
  11. Van Huffel S: Enhanced resolution based on minimum variance estimation and exponential data modeling. Signal Processing 1993,33(3):333-355. 10.1016/0165-1684(93)90130-3Google Scholar
  12. Ephraim Y, Van Trees HL: A signal subspace approach for speech enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 1995,3(4):251-266. 10.1109/89.397090Google Scholar
  13. Huang J, Zhao Y: Energy-constrained signal subspace method for speech enhancement and recognition. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 1997,4(10):283-285. 10.1109/97.633769Google Scholar
  14. Rezayee A, Gazor S: An adaptive KLT approach for speech enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 2001,9(2):87-95. 10.1109/89.902276Google Scholar
  15. Jensen SH, Hansen PC, Hansen SD, Sørensen JAa: Reduction of broad-band noise in speech by truncated QSVD. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 1995,3(6):439–448. 10.1109/89.482211MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu Y, Loizou PC: A subspace approach for enhancing speech corrupted by colored noise. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 2002,9(7):204-206. 10.1109/LSP.2002.801721Google Scholar
  17. Hu Y, Loizou PC: A generalized subspace approach for enhancing speech corrupted by colored noise. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 2003,11(4):334-341. 10.1109/TSA.2003.814458Google Scholar
  18. Lev-Ari H, Ephraim Y: Extension of the signal subspace speech enhancement approach to colored noise. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 2003,10(4):104-106. 10.1109/LSP.2003.808544Google Scholar
  19. Mittal U, Phamdo N: Signal/noise KLT based approach for enhancing speech degraded by colored noise. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 2000,8(2):159–167. 10.1109/89.824700Google Scholar
  20. Moonen M, Van Dooren P, Vandewalle J: A singular value decomposition updating algorithm for subspace tracking. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 1992,13(4):1015-1038. 10.1137/0613061MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Stewart GW: An updating algorithm for subspace tracking. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1992,40(6):1535-1541. 10.1109/78.139256Google Scholar
  22. Stewart GW: Updating a rank-revealing ULV decomposition. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 1993,14(2):494-499. 10.1137/0614034MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Adams G, Griffin MF, Stewart GW: Direction-of-arrival estimation using the rank-revealing URV decomposition. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '91), May 1991, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 2: 1385–1388.Google Scholar
  24. Liu KJR, O'Leary DP, Stewart GW, Wu Y-JJ: URV ESPRIT for tracking time-varying signals. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1994,42(12):3441-3448. 10.1109/78.340778Google Scholar
  25. Van Huffel S, Zha H: An efficient total least squares algorithm based on a rank-revealing two-sided orthogonal decomposition. Numerical Algorithms 1993,4(1-2):101-133.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Luk FT, Qiao S: A new matrix decomposition for signal processing. Automatica 1994,30(1):39–43. 10.1016/0005-1098(94)90227-5MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Luk FT, Qiao S: Adaptive algorithm for interference canceling in array processing. In Advanced Signal Processing Algorithms, Architectures, and Implementations VI, August 1996, Denver, Colo, USA, Proceedings of SPIE Edited by: Luk FT. 2846: 151–161.Google Scholar
  28. Bojanczyk AW, Lebak JM: Downdating a ULLV decomposition of two matrices. In Proceedings of the 5th SIAM Conference on Applied Linear Algebra, June 1994, Snowbird, Utah, USA. Edited by: Lewis JG. SIAM; 261–265.MATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhong W, Li S, Tai H-M: Signal subspace approach for narrowband noise reduction in speech. IEE Proceedings: Vision, Image and Signal Processing 2005,152(6):800-805. 10.1049/ip-vis:20045246Google Scholar
  30. Hansen PC: Rank-deficient prewhitening with quotient SVD and ULV decompositions. BIT Numerical Mathematics 1998,38(1):34-43. 10.1007/BF02510915MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Hansen PC, Jensen SH: Prewhitening for rank-deficient noise in subspace methods for noise reduction. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2005,53(10):3718-3726.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Dologlou I, Carayannis G: Physical interpretation of signal reconstruction from reduced rank matrices. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1991,39(7):1681-1682. 10.1109/78.134407Google Scholar
  33. Hansen PC, Jensen SH: FIR filter representations of reduced-rank noise reduction. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1998,46(6):1737-1741. 10.1109/78.678511Google Scholar
  34. Hansen PC: Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems: Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion. SIAM, Philadelphia, Pa, USA; 1998.Google Scholar
  35. Stewart GW: Rank degeneracy. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 1984,5(2):403-413. 10.1137/0905030MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Konstantinides K, Yao K: Statistical analysis of effective singular values in matrix rank determination. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1988,36(5):757-763. 10.1109/29.1585MATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Jabloun F, Champagne B: Incorporating the human hearing properties in the signal subspace approach for speech enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 2003,11(6):700-708. 10.1109/TSA.2003.818031Google Scholar
  38. You CH, Koh SN, Rahardja S: An invertible frequency eigendomain transformation for masking-based subspace speech enhancement. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 2005,12(6):461-464.Google Scholar
  39. McAulay RJ, Quateri TF: Speech analysis/synthesis based on a sinusoidal representation. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1986,34(4):744-754. 10.1109/TASSP.1986.1164910Google Scholar
  40. Vanhamme L, Fierro RD, Van Huffel S, de Beer R: Fast removal of residual water in proton spectra. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 1998,132(2):197-203. 10.1006/jmre.1998.1425Google Scholar
  41. Vanhamme L, Sundin T, van Hecke P, Van Huffel S: MR spectroscopy quantitation: a review of time-domain methods. NMR in Biomedicine 2001,14(4):233-246. 10.1002/nbm.695Google Scholar
  42. De Moor B: Total least squares for affinely structured matrices and the noisy realization problem. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1994,42(11):3104-3113. 10.1109/78.330370Google Scholar
  43. Hansen PC: The truncated SVD as a method for regularization. BIT Numerical Mathematics 1987,27(4):534-553. 10.1007/BF01937276MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. Björck Å: Numerical Methods for Least Squares Problems. SIAM, Philadelphia, Pa, USA; 1996.MATHGoogle Scholar
  45. Thorpe AJ, Scharf LL: Data adaptive rank-shaping methods for solving least squares problems. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1995,43(7):1591-1601. 10.1109/78.398720Google Scholar
  46. Fierro RD, Hansen PC: Low-rank revealing UTV decompositions. Numerical Algorithms 1997,15(1):37-55. 10.1023/A:1019254318361MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. Fierro RD, Hansen PC, Hansen PSK: UTV Tools: Matlab templates for rank-revealing UTV decompositions. Numerical Algorithms 1999,20(2-3):165-194.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. Fierro RD, Hansen PC: UTV Expansion Pack: special-purpose rank-revealing algorithms. Numerical Algorithms 2005,40(1):47-66. 10.1007/s11075-005-2263-2MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. Golub GH: Numerical methods for solving least squares problems. Numerische Mathematik 1965,7(3):206-216. 10.1007/BF01436075MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. Hansen PSK, Hansen PC, Hansen SD, Sørensen JAa: Noise reduction of speech signals using the rank-revealing ULLV decomposition. Signal Processing VIII. Theories and Applications, Proceedings of the 8th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO '96), September 1996, Trieste, Italy 2: 967–970.Google Scholar
  51. Hansen PSK, Hansen PC, Hansen SD, Sørensen JAa: ULV-based signal subspace methods for speech enhancement. Proceedings of International Workshop on Acoustic Echo and Noise Control (IWAENC '97), September 1997, London, UK 9–12.Google Scholar
  52. Luk FT, Qiao S: A symmetric rank-revealing Toeplitz matrix decomposition. The Journal of VLSI Signal Processing 1996,14(1):19–28. 10.1007/BF00925265MATHGoogle Scholar
  53. Hansen PC, Yalamov PY: Computing symmetric rank-revealing decompositions via triangular factorization. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 2001,23(2):443-458. 10.1137/S0895479800370068MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. Jensen J, Hendriks RC, Heusdens R, Jensen SH: Smoothed subspace based noise suppression with application to speech enhancement. Proceedings of the 13th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO '05), September 2005, Antalya, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  55. Bunch JR, Nielsen CP: Updating the singular value decomposition. Numerische Mathematik 1978,31(2):111-129. 10.1007/BF01397471MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. Gu M, Eisenstat SC: Downdating the singular value decomposition. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 1995,16(3):793-810. 10.1137/S0895479893251472MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. Björck Å, Golub GH: Numerical methods for computing angles between linear subspaces. Mathematics of Computation 1973,27(123):579–594.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© P. C. Hansen and S. H. Jensen. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement