Table 1 Comparison of evaluated errors in (29).
Method |
|
|
|
| Design time (seconds) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deng's method in Section 2, | 0.242 | 0.03145 | 0.001205 | 0.0001788 | 0.38 |
Lee, Caccetta, and Rehbock's method [23], LS design, | 0.0992 | 0.005276 | 0.002199 | 0.0000718 | 3.19 |
Proposed LS design, | 0.1474 | 0.004137 | 0.002312 | 0.0000707 | 28.36 |
Proposed LS design, | 0.04464 | 0.001927 | 0.000724 | 0.0000543 | 28.13 |
Lee, Caccetta and Rehbock's method [23], WLS design, | 0.155 | 0.002836 | 0.00307 | 0.0000838 | 58.63 |
Proposed minimax design, | 0.1964 | 0.002966 | 0.003235 | 0.0000834 | 148.76 |
Proposed minimax design, | 0.0664 | 0.001189 | 0.001141 | 0.0000365 | 196.56 |
(%)
(%)
