Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Clustering of Dependent Components: A New Paradigm for fMRI Signal Detection

  • Anke Meyer-Bäse1Email author,
  • Monica K. Hurdal2,
  • Oliver Lange1 and
  • Helge Ritter3
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing20052005:490821

https://doi.org/10.1155/ASP.2005.3089

Received: 1 February 2004

Published: 17 November 2005

Abstract

Exploratory data-driven methods such as unsupervised clustering and independent component analysis (ICA) are considered to be hypothesis-generating procedures and are complementary to the hypothesis-led statistical inferential methods in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Recently, a new paradigm in ICA emerged, that of finding "clusters" of dependent components. This intriguing idea found its implementation into two new ICA algorithms: tree-dependent and topographic ICA. For fMRI, this represents the unifying paradigm of combining two powerful exploratory data analysis methods, ICA and unsupervised clustering techniques. For the fMRI data, a comparative quantitative evaluation between the two methods, tree-dependent and topographic ICA, was performed. The comparative results were evaluated by (1) task-related activation maps, (2) associated time courses, and (3) ROC study. The most important findings in this paper are that (1) both tree-dependent and topographic ICA are able to identify signal components with high correlation to the fMRI stimulus, and that (2) topographic ICA outperforms all other ICA methods including tree-dependent ICA for 8 and 9 ICs. However for 16 ICs, topographic ICA is outperformed by tree-dependent ICA (KGV) using as an approximation of the mutual information the kernel generalized variance. The applicability of the new algorithm is demonstrated on experimental data.

Keywords and phrases

dependent component analysistopographic ICAtree-dependent ICAfMRI

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA
(2)
Department of Mathematics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA
(3)
Neuroinformatics Group, Faculty of Technology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany

Copyright

© Meyer-Bäse et al. 2005

Advertisement