Open Access

Performance Measure as Feedback Variable in Image Processing

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing20062006:027848

https://doi.org/10.1155/ASP/2006/27848

Received: 28 February 2005

Accepted: 8 November 2005

Published: 27 March 2006

Abstract

This paper extends the view of image processing performance measure presenting the use of this measure as an actual value in a feedback structure. The idea behind is that the control loop, which is built in that way, drives the actual feedback value to a given set point. Since the performance measure depends explicitly on the application, the inclusion of feedback structures and choice of appropriate feedback variables are presented on example of optical character recognition in industrial application. Metrics for quantification of performance at different image processing levels are discussed. The issues that those metrics should address from both image processing and control point of view are considered. The performance measures of individual processing algorithms that form a character recognition system are determined with respect to the overall system performance.

[1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526]

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Automation, University of Bremen

References

  1. Bailey S, Forshaw M, Hodgetts M: A methodology for goal oriented image processing-performance evaluation. Workshop on Performance Characterisation and Benchmarking of Vision Systems , January 1999, Canary Islands, SpainGoogle Scholar
  2. Wenyin L, Zhai J, Dori D, Long T: A system for performance evaluation of arc segmentation algorithms. Procedings of 3rd Workshop on Empirical Evaluation Methods in Computer Vision (CVPR '01), December 2001, Kauai, Hawaii, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. McCall JC, Trivedi MM: Performance evaluation of a vision based lane tracker designed for driver assistance systems. Computer Vision Robotics Research Laboratory, University of California , San Diego, Calif, USA; December 2004.Google Scholar
  4. Palmer PL, Dabis H, Kittler J: A performance measure for boundary detection algorithms. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 1996, 63(3):476-494. 10.1006/cviu.1996.0036View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Mirmehdi M, Palmer PL, Kittler J: Optimising the complete image feature extraction chain. Proceedings of the 3rd Asian Conference on Computer Vision (ACCV '98), January 1997, Hong Kong 2: 307-314.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Ogata K: Modern Control Engineering. Prentice-Hall, London, UK; 2002.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Corke P: Visual Control of Robots: High Performance Visual Servoing. Research Studies Press, Taunton, UK; Wiley, New York, NY, USA; 1996.Google Scholar
  8. Jähne B, Haußecker H, Geißler P (Eds): Handbook of Computer Vision and Applications-Vol.3. Systems and Applications. Academic Press, London, UK; 1999.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Nair D, Wenzel L, Barp A, Siddiqi A: Control strategies and image processing. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Signal Processing and Its Applications (ISSPA '03), July 2003, Paris, France 557-560.Google Scholar
  10. Gräser A, Ivlev O, Ristić D: First experiences with feedback structures in image processing. Procedings of 24th Colloquium of Automation, 2002, Salzhausen, Germany 98-109.Google Scholar
  11. Kriegman D, Hager GD, Morse AS (Eds): The Confluence of Vision and Control. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 1998.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Mirmehdi M, Palmer PL, Kittler J, Dabis H: Feedback control strategies for object recognition. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 1999, 8(8):1084-1101. 10.1109/83.777089MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Ristić D, Volosyak I, Gräser A: Feedback Control in Image Processing. atp international-automation technology in practice 2005, (1):61-70.Google Scholar
  14. Peng J, Bhanu B: Closed-loop object recognition using reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1998, 20(2):139-154. 10.1109/34.659932View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Marchant JA: Testing a measure of image quality for acquisition. Image and Vision Computing 2002, 20(7):449-458. 10.1016/S0262-8856(01)00088-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Racky J, Pandit M: Active Illumination for the segmentation of surface deformations. International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '99), October 1999, Kobe, Japan 1:Google Scholar
  17. Jähne B: Practical Handbook on Image Processing for Scientific Applications. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Fla, USA; 1997.MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Volosyak I, Kouzmitcheva O, Ristić D, Gräser A: Improvement of visual perceptual capabilities by feedback structures for robotic system FRIEND. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part C 2005, 35(1):66-74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Demant C, Streicher-Abel B, Waszkewitz P, Strick M: Industrial Image Processing-Visual Quality Control in Manufacturing. Springer, Berlin, Germany; 1999.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Mori S, Nishida H, Yamada H: Optical Character Recognition. John Wiley & Sons, New York; 1999.Google Scholar
  21. Maitre H, Zinn-Justin J: Entropy, information and image. In Progress in Picture Processing. Springer, North Holland, Amsterdam; 1996:81-115.Google Scholar
  22. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE: Digital Image Processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA; 2002.Google Scholar
  23. Rahman CA, Badawy W, Radmanesh A: A real time vehicle's license plate recognition system. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance, July 2003, Miami, Fla, USA 163-166.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Abutaleb AS: Automatic thresholding of gray-level pictures using two-dimensional entropy. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing 1989, 47(1):22-32. 10.1016/0734-189X(89)90051-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Sezgin M, Sankur B: Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation. Journal of Electronic Imaging 2004, 13(1):146-165. 10.1117/1.1631315View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Paulus DWR, Hornegger J: Pattern Recognition and Image Processing in C++. F. Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden, Germany; 1995.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ristić and Gräser 2006