Skip to main content

Advertisement

Accuracy Evaluation for Region Centroid-Based Registration of Fluorescent CLSM Imagery

Abstract

We present an accuracy evaluation of a semiautomatic registration technique for 3D volume reconstruction from fluorescent confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) imagery. The presented semiautomatic method is designed based on our observations that (a) an accurate point selection is much harder than an accurate region (segment) selection for a human, (b) a centroid selection of any region is less accurate by a human than by a computer, and (c) registration based on structural shape of a region rather than based on intensity-defined point is more robust to noise and to morphological deformation of features across stacks. We applied the method to image mosaicking and image alignment registration steps and evaluated its performance with 20 human subjects on CLSM images with stained blood vessels. Our experimental evaluation showed significant benefits of automation for 3D volume reconstruction in terms of achieved accuracy, consistency of results, and performance time. In addition, the results indicate that the differences between registration accuracy obtained by experts and by novices disappear with the proposed semiautomatic registration technique while the absolute registration accuracy increases.

References

  1. 1.

    Lee S-C, Bajcsy P: Feature based registration of fluorescent LSCM imagery using region centroids. Medical Imaging, February 2005, San Diego, Calif, USA, Proceedings of the SPIE 5747: 170–181.

  2. 2.

    Collins CL, Ideker JH, Kurtis KE: Laser scanning confocal microscopy for in situ monitoring of alkali-silica reaction. Journal of Microscopy 2004, 213(2):149–157. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2004.01280.x

  3. 3.

    Pawley JB: The Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy. Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA; 1990.

  4. 4.

    Zitova B, Flusser J: Image registration methods: a survey. Image and Vision Computing 2003, 21(11):977–1000. 10.1016/S0262-8856(03)00137-9

  5. 5.

    Hill DLG, Batchelor PG, Holden M, Hawkes DJ: Medical image registration. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2001, 46(3):R1–R45. 10.1088/0031-9155/46/3/201

  6. 6.

    Brown LG: A survey of image registration techniques. ACM Computing Surveys 1992, 24(4):325–376. 10.1145/146370.146374

  7. 7.

    Cohen LD, Cohen I: Deformable models for 3-D medical images using finite elements and balloons. Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '92), June 1992, Champaign, Ill, USA 592–598.

  8. 8.

    Goshtasby A: Registration of images with geometric distortions. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1988, 26(1):60–64. 10.1109/36.3000

  9. 9.

    Tuohy M, McConchie CA, Knox RB, Szarski L, Arkin A: Computer-assisted three-dimensional reconstruction technology in plant cell image analysis; applications of interactive computer graphics. Journal of Microscopy 1987, 147(1):83–88. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1987.tb02820.x

  10. 10.

    Maintz JBA, Viergever MA: A survey of medical image registration. Medical Image Analysis 1998, 2(1):1–36.

  11. 11.

    Nocito A, Kononen J, Kallioniemi OP, Sauter G: Tissue microarrays (TMAs) for high-throughput molecular pathology research. International Journal of Cancer 2001, 94(1):1–5. 10.1002/ijc.1385

  12. 12.

    Goshtasby A, Stockman GC, Page CV: A region-based approach to digital image transformation with subpixel accuracy. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1986, 24(3):390–399.

  13. 13.

    Flusser J, Suk T: A moment-based approach to registration of images with affine geometric distortion. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1994, 32(2):382–387. 10.1109/36.295052

  14. 14.

    Li H, Manjunath BS, Mitra SK: A contour-based approach to multisensor image registration. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 1995, 4(3):320–334. 10.1109/83.366480

  15. 15.

    Pratt WK: Correlation techniques of image registration. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 1974, 10(3):353–358.

  16. 16.

    Viola P, Wells WM III: Alignment by maximization of mutual information. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV '95), June 1995, Cambridge, Mass, USA 16–23.

  17. 17.

    Hermosillo G, Chefd'Hotel C, Faugeras O: Variational methods for multimodal image matching. International Journal of Computer Vision 2002, 50(3):329–343. 10.1023/A:1020830525823

  18. 18.

    Jungke M, Von Seelenon W, Bielke G, et al.: A system for the diagnostic use of tissue characterizing parameters in NMR-tomography. Proceedings of Information Processing in Medical Imaging (IPMI '87), 1987 39: 471–481.

  19. 19.

    Montgomery K, Ross MD: Non fiducial, shaped-based registration of biological tissue. Three-Dimensional Microscopy: Image Acquisition and Processing III, January 1996, San Jose, Calif, USA, Proceedings of SPIE 2655: 224–232.

  20. 20.

    Goulden CH: Methods of Statistical Analysis. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 1956.

  21. 21.

    Kooper R, Shirk A, Lee S-C, Lin A, Folberg R, Bajcsy P: 3D medical volume reconstruction using Web services. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS '05), July 2005, Orlando, Fla, USA 716.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Sang-Chul Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S., Bajcsy, P., Lin, A. et al. Accuracy Evaluation for Region Centroid-Based Registration of Fluorescent CLSM Imagery. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2006, 082480 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1155/ASP/2006/82480

Download citation

Keywords

  • Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope
  • Accuracy Evaluation
  • Structural Shape
  • Point Selection
  • Accuracy Increase