Skip to main content

Efficient Video Transcoding from H.263 to H.264/AVC Standard with Enhanced Rate Control

Abstract

A new video coding standard H.264/AVC has been recently developed and standardized. The standard represents a number of advances in video coding technology in terms of both coding efficiency and flexibility and is expected to replace the existing standards such as H.263 and MPEG-1/2/4 in many possible applications. In this paper we investigate and present efficient syntax transcoding and downsizing transcoding methods from H.263 to H.264/AVC standard. Specifically, we propose an efficient motion vector reestimation scheme using vector median filtering and a fast intraprediction mode selection scheme based on coarse edge information obtained from integer-transform coefficients. Furthermore, an enhanced rate control method based on a quadratic model is proposed for selecting quantization parameters at the sequence and frame levels together with a new frame-layer bit allocation scheme based on the side information in the precoded video. Extensive experiments have been conducted and the results show the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed methods.

References

  1. 1.

    Haskell B, Howard PG, LeCun Y, et al.: Image and video coding - emerging standards and beyond. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 1998, 8(7):814–837. 10.1109/76.735379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Vetro A, Christopoulos C, Sun H: Video transcoding architectures and techniques: an overview. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2003, 20(2):18–29. 10.1109/MSP.2003.1184336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bjork N, Christopoulos C: Transcoder architecture for video coding. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 1998, 44(1):88–98. 10.1109/30.663734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Shanableh T, Ghanbari M: Transcoding of video into different encoding formats. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '00), June 2000, Istanbul, Turkey 1927–1930.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shen B, Sethi IK, Vasudev B: Adaptive motion-vector resampling for compressed video downscaling. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 1999, 9(6):929–936. 10.1109/76.785730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tan Y-P, Sun H, Liang Y: On the methods and applications of arbitrary downsizing video transcoding. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, August 2002, Lausanne, Switzerland 609–612.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Shanableh T, Ghanbari M: Heterogeneous video transcoding to lower spatio-temporal resolutions and different encoding formats. IEEE Transaction on Multimedia 2000, 2(2):101–110. 10.1109/6046.845014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wiegand T, Sullivan G: Draft ITU-T Recommendation and Final Draft International Standard of Joint Video Specification (ITU-T Rec. H.264 ISO/IEC 14496-10 AVC). March 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ostermann J, Bormans J, List P, et al.: Video coding with H.264/AVC: tools, performance, and complexity. IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine 2004, 4(1):7–28. 10.1109/MCAS.2004.1286980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Nguyen V-A, Tan Y-P: Efficient H.263 to H.264/AVC video transcoding using enhanced rate control. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '05), September 2005, Genoa, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wiegand T, Sullivan GJ, Bjontegaard G, Luthra A: Overview of the H.264/AVC video coding standard. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2003, 13: 560–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Li ZG, Pan F, Lim KP, Feng GN, Lin X, Rahardja S: Adaptive basic unit layer rate control for JVT, JVT-G012-r1. 7th Meeting, Pattaya II, March 2003, Bangkok, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Joch A, Kossentini F, Nasiopoulos P: A performance analysis of the ITU-T draft H.26L video coding standard. 12th International Packet Video Workshop, April 2002, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Pan F, Lin X, Susanto R: Fast intra mode decision algorithm for H.264/AVC video coding. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '04), October 2004, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Shen B, Shethi IK: Direct feature extraction from compressed images. Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases IV, February 1996, San Jose, Calif, USA, Proceedings of SPIE 2670: 404–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zhu S, Ma KK: A new diamond search algorithm for fast blockmatching motion estimation. IEEE Transaction on Image Processing 2000, 9: 287–290. 10.1109/83.821744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Jeon B, Lee J: Fast mode decision for H.264. ITU-T VCEG (Q.6/16), July 2003

  18. 18.

    Xie B, Zeng W: Sequence-based rate control for constant quality video. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '02), September 2002, Rochester, NY, USA 1: 77–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    ITU-T/SG15 : Video Codec Test Model TMN-8. Portland, June 1997

  20. 20.

    JM Reference Software Version 7.4, https://doi.org/iphome.hhi.de/suehring/tml/download

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viet-Anh Nguyen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nguyen, V., Tan, Y. Efficient Video Transcoding from H.263 to H.264/AVC Standard with Enhanced Rate Control. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2006, 083563 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1155/ASP/2006/83563

Download citation

Keywords

  • Quantum Information
  • Selection Scheme
  • Motion Vector
  • Allocation Scheme
  • Quadratic Model