Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research Article
  • Open Access

A Gradient-Based Optimum Block Adaptation ICA Technique for Interference Suppression in Highly Dynamic Communication Channels

  • 1 and
  • 2
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing20062006:084057

https://doi.org/10.1155/ASP/2006/84057

  • Received: 21 February 2005
  • Accepted: 18 February 2006
  • Published:

Abstract

The fast fixed-point independent component analysis (ICA) algorithm has been widely used in various applications because of its fast convergence and superior performance. However, in a highly dynamic environment, real-time adaptation is necessary to track the variations of the mixing matrix. In this scenario, the gradient-based online learning algorithm performs better, but its convergence is slow, and depends on a proper choice of convergence factor. This paper develops a gradient-based optimum block adaptive ICA algorithm (OBA/ICA) that combines the advantages of the two algorithms. Simulation results for telecommunication applications indicate that the resulting performance is superior under time-varying conditions, which is particularly useful in mobile communications.

Keywords

  • Independent Component Analysis
  • Mobile Communication
  • Fast Convergence
  • Online Learning
  • Dynamic Communication

[12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728]

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA
(2)
Department of Engineering Sciences, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL 32114, USA

References

  1. Lee T-W, Lewicki MS, Sejnowski TJ: ICA mixture models for unsupervised classification of non-Gaussian classes and automatic context switching in blind signal separation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2000, 22(10):1078-1089. 10.1109/34.879789View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ristaniemi T, Joutsensalo J: Advanced ICA-based receivers for block fading DS-CDMA channels. Signal Processing 2002, 82(3):417-431. 10.1016/S0165-1684(01)00194-3View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Castedo L, Escudero C, Dapena A: A blind signal separation method for multiuser communications. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1997, 45(5):1343-1348. 10.1109/78.575706MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Malaroiu S, Kiviluoto K, Oja E: Time series prediction with independent component analysis. Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Investment Technology, January 2000, Gold Coast, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  5. McKeown M, Makeig S, Brown S, et al.: Blind separation of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Human Brain Mapping 1998, 6(5-6):368-372. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:5/6<368::AID-HBM7>3.0.CO;2-EView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Isbell CL, Viola P: Restructuring sparse high-dimensional data for effective retrieval. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Volume 11. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA; 1999.Google Scholar
  7. Hyvärinen A, Oja E: A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis. Neural Computation 1997, 9(7):1483-1492. 10.1162/neco.1997.9.7.1483View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Hyvärinen A: Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 1999, 10(3):626-634. 10.1109/72.761722View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Malouche Z, Macchi O: Adaptive unsupervised extraction of one component of a linear mixture with a single neuron. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 1998, 9(1):123-138. 10.1109/72.655034View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Gaeta M, Lacoume J-L: Source separation without prior knowledge: the maximum likelihood solution. Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO '90), September 1990, Barcelona, Spain 621-624.Google Scholar
  11. Pham D-T: Blind separation of instantaneous mixture of sources via an independent component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1996, 44(11):2768-2779. 10.1109/78.542183View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Comon P: Independent component analysis, a new concept. Signal Processing 1994, 36(3):287-314. 10.1016/0165-1684(94)90029-9View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Principe J, Xu D, Fisher JW III: Information-theoretic learning. In Unsupervised Adaptive Filtering. Volume I. Edited by: Haykin S. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 2000:265-319.Google Scholar
  14. Comon P, Mourrain B: Decomposition of quantics in sums of powers of linear forms. Signal Processing 1996, 53(2-3):93-107. 10.1016/0165-1684(96)00079-5View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Cardoso J-F: High-order contrasts for independent component analysis. Neural Computation 1999, 11(1):157-192. 10.1162/089976699300016863MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Yeredor A: Blind source separation via the second characteristic function. Signal Processing 2000, 80(5):897-902. 10.1016/S0165-1684(00)00062-1View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Hyvarienen A, Karhunen J, Oja E: Independent Component Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Sutton RS: Adapting bias by gradient descent: an incremental version of delta-bar-delta. Proceedings of the 10th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, July 1992, San Jose, Calif, USA 171-176.Google Scholar
  19. Murata N, Müller K-R, Ziehe A, Amari S: Adaptive on-line learning in changing environments. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS '96), December 1996, Denver, Colo, USA 9: 599-605.Google Scholar
  20. Murata N, Kawanabe M, Ziehe A, Müller K, Amari S: On-line learning in changing environments with applications in supervised and unsupervised learning. Neural Networks 2002, 15(4–6):743-760.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Orr GB: Dynamics and algorithms for stochastic search, M.S. thesis. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Oregon Graduate Institute, Beaverton, Ore, USA; 1995.Google Scholar
  22. Bottou L: Online algorithms and stochastic approximations. In Online Learning in Neural Networks. Edited by: Saad D. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1998:9-42.Google Scholar
  23. Orr GB, Leen TK: Using curvature information for fast stochastic search. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Volume 9. Edited by: Mozer M, Jordan M, Petsche T. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA; 1997.Google Scholar
  24. Ristaniemi T, Joutsensalo J: Advanced ICA-based receivers for DS-CDMA systems. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio, Communications, September 2000, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang T, Mikhael WB: A general approach for image and co-channel interference suppression in diversity wireless receivers employing ICA. Journal of Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing 2004, 23(4):317-327.MATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Kostanic I, Mikhael WB: Blind source separation technique for reduction of co-channel interference. Electronics Letters 2002, 38(20):1210-1211. 10.1049/el:20020817View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Leong WY, Holmer J: Implementing ICA in blind multiuser detection. IEEE International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies, October 2004, Sapporo, Japan 2: 947-952.Google Scholar
  28. Mikhael WB, Wu F: A fast block FIR adaptive digital filtering algorithm with individual adaptation of parameters. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems 1989, 36(1):1-10. 10.1109/31.16558MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mikhael and Yang 2006

Advertisement