Open Access

H.264 Layered Coded Video over Wireless Networks: Channel Coding and Modulation Constraints

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing20062006:085870

https://doi.org/10.1155/ASP/2006/85870

Received: 13 July 2005

Accepted: 18 February 2006

Published: 17 May 2006

Abstract

This paper considers the prioritised transmission of H.264 layered coded video over wireless channels. For appropriate protection of video data, methods such as prioritised forward error correction coding (FEC) or hierarchical quadrature amplitude modulation (HQAM) can be employed, but each imposes system constraints. FEC provides good protection but at the price of a high overhead and complexity. HQAM is less complex and does not introduce any overhead, but permits only fixed data ratios between the priority layers. Such constraints are analysed and practical solutions are proposed for layered transmission of data-partitioned and SNR-scalable coded video where combinations of HQAM and FEC are used to exploit the advantages of both coding methods. Simulation results show that the flexibility of SNR scalability and absence of picture drift imply that SNR scalability as modelled is superior to data partitioning in such applications.

[12345678910111213]

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Electronic Systems Engineering, University of Essex

References

  1. Shannon CE: A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell Systems Technical Journal 1948, 27: 379-423, 623–656.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Goldsmith AJ, Chua S-G: Adaptive coded modulation for fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Communications 1998, 46(5):595-602. 10.1109/26.668727View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheng L, Zhang W, Chen L: Rate-distortion optimized unequal loss protection for FGS compressed video. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting 2004, 50(2):126-131. 10.1109/TBC.2004.824212View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Gallant M, Kossentini F: Rate-distortion optimized layered coding with unequal error protection for robust internet video. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2001, 11(3):357-372. 10.1109/76.911161View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. ITU-T : Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. ITU-T Recommendation H.264, May 2003Google Scholar
  6. ETSI : Digital video broadcasting (DVB); framing structure, channel coding and modulation for digital terrestrial television. EN 300 744, V1.4.1, 2001Google Scholar
  7. Barmada B, Ghandi MM, Ghanbari M, Jones EV: Prioritized transmission of data partitioned H.264 video with hierarchical QAM. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 2005, 12(8):577-580.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghandi MM, Ghanbari M: Layered H.264 video transmission with hierarchical QAM. Journal on Visual Communication and Image Representation 2006, 17(2):451-466. 10.1016/j.jvcir.2005.05.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Vitthaladevuni AR, Alouini MS: A recursive algorithm for the exact BER computation of generalized hierarchical QAM constellations. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 2003, 49(1):297-307. 10.1109/TIT.2002.806159MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghanbari M: Standard Codecs: Image Compression to Advanced Video Coding. IEE, London, UK; 2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Keller T, Munster M, Hanzo L: Turbo-coded burst-by-burst adaptive wide-band speech transceiver. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 2000, 18(11):2362-2372.Google Scholar
  12. Berrou C, Glavieux A: Near optimum error correcting coding and decoding: turbo-codes. IEEE Transactions on Communications 1996, 44(10):1261-1271. 10.1109/26.539767View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Barmada B, Jones EV: Adaptive modulation and coding for multimedia services. Proceedings of the 5th IEE International Conference on 3G Mobile Communication Technologies (3G '04), October 2004, London, UK 503: 322-326.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Ghandi et al. 2006