EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Table 3 Performance comparison between the LCP and QLCP measures on different models

From: Robust surface registration using N-points approximate congruent sets

	$G_{b}$			$G_{i}$			$G_{j}$
	Δ	S _r (%)	t (s)	Δ	S _r (%)	t (s)	Δ	Sr (%)	t (s)
LCP (α = 1)	0.3738	100	21.4	0.7377	95	25.6	0.7141	100	6.6
LCP (α = 2)	0.7252	100	8.3	0.7264	90	26.5	2.4107	100	15.2
LCP (α = 4)	1.2058	100	16.8	0.9550	30	24.8	3.7339	10	27.1
LCP (α = 8)	0.5809	100	47.9	1.3048	20	22.6	4.5258	10	37.8
QLCP (λ = 1, α = 1)	0.3524	100	31.3	0.5304	95	33.2	0.4041	100	11.7
QLCP (λ = 1, α = 2)	0.2622	100	30.8	0.5225	100	43.0	0.5107	100	14.6
QLCP (λ = 1, α = 4)	0.2895	100	62.0	0.7329	95	43.9	0.7857	100	28.6
QLCP (λ = 1, α = 8)	0.3934	100	81.5	0.8767	80	85.1	0.9193	100	97.1
QLCP (λ = 2, α = 1)	0.2127	100	49.3	0.3264	95	29.1	0.3782	100	10.9
QLCP (λ = 2, α = 2)	0.3055	100	35.9	0.4783	100	61.2	0.5394	100	23.5
QLCP (λ = 2, α = 4)	0.2904	100	59.3	0.4910	100	97.8	0.6343	100	33.6
QLCP (λ = 2, α = 8)	0.3537	100	142.3	0.8897	85	79.5	0.7970	100	64.0

Back to article page