Table 13 Comparisons of correct diagnosis rate for stochastic faults in TEP between PC1DARMF algorithm and MSBA
From: Fault diagnosis of Tennessee Eastman process using signal geometry matching technique
Fault type | PC1DARMF algorithm | MSBA[17] |
|---|---|---|
IDV(8) | 20% | 60.29% |
IDV(9) | 35% | 9.52% |
IDV(10) | 5% | 47.41% |
IDV(11) | 45% | 36.51% |
IDV(12) | 45% | 67.44% |
Average | 30% | 44.23% |