Skip to main content

Table 15 Credibility of PC1DARMF algorithm for IDV(0) to IDV(20) diagnosis using PC i

From: Fault diagnosis of Tennessee Eastman process using signal geometry matching technique

Rank

PC1

PC2

PC3

PC4

PC5

PC6

1

19.05%

17.14%

22.86%

20.48%

26.19%

20.48%

2

11.90%

6.67%

12.86%

11.43%

6.19%

8.57%

3

9.05%

5.71%

10.00%

10.00%

5.24%

4.29%

4

9.52%

7.62%

8.57%

4.76%

4.76%

4.76%

5

4.76%

5.71%

3.81%

4.76%

7.14%

7.26%

6

6.19%

7.62%

5.24%

7.14%

5.71%

5.71%

7

7.62%

8.10%

3.81%

7.14%

5.24%

6.67%

8

5.71%

5.71%

3.33%

5.71%

5.24%

4.29%

9

2.38%

7.62%

2.38%

2.86%

2.86%

2.86%

10

6.67%

5.24%

3.81%

3.81%

7.14%

4.29%

11

3.33%

5.24%

4.29%

6.19%

9.52%

1.43%

12

6.67%

5.24%

5.24%

5.24%

3.33%

4.76%

13

2.86%

1.90%

2.86%

3.81%

0.95%

2.38%

14

2.38%

5.24%

3.81%

0.48%

2.38%

3.81%

15

0.48%

0.48%

2.38%

0.95%

0.95%

2.86%

16

0.48%

1.43%

1.90%

1.90%

3.33%

3.81%

17

0.48%

1.43%

0.48%

1.90%

0.95%

5.24%

18

0.0

0.95%

0.48%

1.43%

1.90%

3.81%

19

0.0

0.0

1.43%

0.0

0.95%

1.43%

20

0.0

0.48%

0.48%

0.0

0.0

0.95%

21

0.48%

0.48%

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0