Table 17 IDV(0) to IDV(20) diagnosis results using PC1DARMF algorithm
From: Fault diagnosis of Tennessee Eastman process using signal geometry matching technique
Fault type | Correct diagnosis rate |
|---|---|
IDV(0) | 15% |
IDV(1) | 30% |
IDV(2) | 95% |
IDV(3) | 0.0 |
IDV(4) | 5% |
IDV(5) | 25% |
IDV(6) | 100% |
IDV(7) | 65% |
IDV(8) | 0.0 |
IDV(9) | 5% |
IDV(10) | 0.0 |
IDV(11) | 15% |
IDV(12) | 0.0 |
IDV(13) | 5% |
IDV(14) | 5% |
IDV(15) | 5% |
IDV(16) | 0.0 |
IDV(17) | 85% |
IDV(18) | 30% |
IDV(19) | 0.0 |
IDV(20) | 0.0 |