Table 5 Credibility of PC1DARMF algorithm for deterministic fault diagnosis using PC i
From: Fault diagnosis of Tennessee Eastman process using signal geometry matching technique
Rank | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 66.25% | 55.00% | 33.75% | 41.25% | 36.25% |
2 | 16.25% | 12.50% | 23.75% | 18.75% | 25.00% |
3 | 12.50% | 21.25% | 17.50% | 13.75% | 16.25% |
4 | 5.00% | 8.75% | 8.75% | 11.25% | 10.00% |
5 | 0.00 | 2.50% | 13.75% | 7.50% | 6.25% |
6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.50% | 6.25% | 6.25% |
7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.25% | 0.00 |
8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |