Skip to main content

Table 1 Performance of the proposed method vs the 9/7 transform

From: Adaptive lifting scheme with sparse criteria for image coding

  

0.05 bpp

0.1 bpp

0.15 bpp

0.2 bpp

  

NSLS(2,2)-OPT-WL1

9/7

NSLS (2,2)-OPT-WL1

9/7

NSLS (2,2)-OPT-WL1

9/7

NSLS (2,2)-OPT-WL1

9/7

 

PSNR

27.85

27.75

30.25

30.31

31.23

31.35

31.76

31.92

elaine

SSIM

0.669

0.659

0.716

0.715

0.739

0.739

0.754

0.756

 

VSNR

18.44

18.09

23.10

23.05

25.60

25.50

27.28

27.42

 

PSNR

25.10

25.09

27.08

27.18

28.36

28.51

29.51

29.58

castle

SSIM

0.725

0.712

0.790

0.780

0.825

0.821

0.855

0.851

 

VSNR

17.54

17.22

21.55

21.10

23.74

23.40

25.80

25.32

 

PSNR

27.51

27.58

29.12

29.24

29.92

30.12

30.50

30.70

einst

SSIM

0.603

0.601

0.654

0.655

0.687

0.689

0.710

0.715

 

VSNR

15.33

15.25

18.62

18.71

20.37

20.47

21.59

21.94

 

PSNR

26.70

26.68

29.59

29.56

31.25

31.47

32.70

32.90

lena

SSIM

0.747

0.734

0.818

0.808

0.851

0.850

0.871

0.873

 

VSNR

15.94

15.73

20.56

20.18

24.06

23.95

26.12

26.15

 

PSNR

26.51

26.43

29.81

30.33

31.84

32.63

33.61

34.44

cameraman

SSIM

0.783

0.774

0.847

0.842

0.887

0.892

0.914

0.915

 

VSNR

16.74

16.34

21.73

21.66

24.94

25.70

27.75

28.34

 

PSNR

24.65

24.55

26.82

26.86

28.43

28.54

29.52

29.74

boat

SSIM

0.675

0.661

0.753

0.746

0.806

0.802

0.837

0.836

 

VSNR

13.41

13.03

17.14

16.89

20.24

19.76

22.19

21.89

 

PSNR

25.75

25.50

29.24

29.17

30.88

31.16

31.12

32.38

peppers

SSIM

0.720

0.705

0.789

0.778

0.818

0.815

0.834

0.832

 

VSNR

16.00

15.51

21.87

21.19

25.18

25.00

27.22

27.09

 

PSNR

24.19

23.84

30.66

29.88

33.99

33.10

36.13

35.82

plane

SSIM

0.809

0.754

0.890

0.871

0.917

0.903

0.931

0.921

 

VSNR

9.48

7.72

17.73

15.51

21.28

20.30

24.68

24.12

 

PSNR

24.88

24.72

27.67

27.73

29.24

29.46

30.45

30.65

average

SSIM

0.647

0.633

0.727

0.720

0.773

0.771

0.803

0.802

 

VSNR

14.50

13.98

18.90

18.62

21.77

21.71

23.90

23.85

  1. The average evaluation was computed over 50 still images.
  2. The values in bold have been used to identify the method achieving the best coding performance.