Skip to main content

Table 14 Coding time (s) comparisons of CIF format benchmarks with the same QP transcoding

From: Mode decision acceleration for H.264/AVC to SVC temporal video transcoding

QP

Sequence

FDFE

MR

Proposed

Time

Time

ΔTS (%)

Time

ΔTS (%)

25

ICE

1201.07

193.44

83.89

306.96

74.44

Akiyo

1274.57

147.35

88.44

187.92

85.26

Foreman

1342.63

318.48

76.28

486.84

63.74

Flower

1408.05

305.14

78.33

509.86

63.79

Average

1306.58

241.10

81.74

372.90

71.81

35

ICE

1183.33

149.29

87.38

203.16

82.83

Akiyo

1197.33

118.10

90.14

128.65

89.26

Foreman

1244.98

175.16

85.93

230.88

81.46

Flower

1348.59

255.53

81.05

372.60

72.37

Average

1243.56

174.52

86.13

233.82

81.48

Average

 

1275.07

207.81

83.94

303.36

76.65