Table 17 Coding time (s) comparisons of CIF format benchmarks with bitrate reduction transcoding
From: Mode decision acceleration for H.264/AVC to SVC temporal video transcoding
QP | Sequence | FDFE | MR | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time | Time | ΔTS(%) | Time | ΔTS(%) | ||
25 | ICE | 1250.15 | 326.99 | 73.84 | 505.95 | 59.53 |
Akiyo | 1296.49 | 262.72 | 79.74 | 433.76 | 66.54 | |
Foreman | 1362.05 | 556.81 | 59.12 | 565.85 | 58.46 | |
Flower | 1402.95 | 490.77 | 65.02 | 655.12 | 53.30 | |
Average | 1327.91 | 409.32 | 69.43 | 540.17 | 59.46 | |
35 | ICE | 1180.91 | 326.38 | 72.36 | 493.10 | 58.24 |
Akiyo | 1255.26 | 254.89 | 79.69 | 414.69 | 66.96 | |
Foreman | 1296.39 | 549.55 | 57.61 | 532.60 | 58.92 | |
Flower | 1357.46 | 482.59 | 64.45 | 635.51 | 53.18 | |
Average | 1272.51 | 403.35 | 68.53 | 518.98 | 59.33 | |
Average | 1300.21 | 406.34 | 68.98 | 529.58 | 59.40 | |