Skip to main content

Table 4 Results for the EEG database (scenario 2)

From: Time–frequency based feature selection for discrimination of non-stationary biosignals

Original size of thet–f representation: 512×500=256000. Number of neighbors: 3

Methodology

ρ min

n rel

n =( n c × n r )

Accuracy (%)

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

PCA with

NA

NA

15=(3×5)

94.00±3.65

(ZO)

94.50±4.38

95.67±4.17

Tiling [5]

    

(NF)

98.50±2.42

95.67±3.17

     

(S)

84.00±10.75

99.00±1.29

PLS with

NA

NA

15=(3×5)

93.60±3.37

(ZO)

94.00±4.59

95.67±4.17

Tiling [5]

    

(NF)

98.50±2.42

95.33±2.81

     

(S)

83.00±10.59

98.75±1.32

Vectorized

NA

NA

NA

93.40±4.12

(ZO)

97.00±4.22

94.00±2.63

PCA [14]

    

(NF)

93.50±4.12

97.00±3.31

     

(S)

86.00±16.47

98.50±2.11

Vectorized

NA

NA

NA

96.00±2.98

(ZO)

100.00±0.00

95.33±3.58

PLS [14]

    

(NF)

95.50±4.97

98.00±2.81

     

(S)

89.00±11.01

100.00±0.00

Algorithm 2 +

NA

NA

NA

98.00±1.88

(ZO)

100.00±0.00

98.66±2.33

2D–PCA

    

(NF)

99.00±2.10

98.00±2.33

(no relevance)

    

(S)

92.00±7.88

100.00±0.00

Algorithm 2 +

NA

NA

NA

98.20±1.13

(ZO)

100.00±0.00

98.33±2.35

2D–PLS

    

(NF)

99.00±2.10

98.66±1.72

(no relevance)

    

(S)

93.00±4.83

100.00±0.00

Method 1

50%

128000

20

94.40±2.95

(ZO)

99.00±2.11

94.00±4.10

     

(NF)

91.50±6.69

97.00±4.29

     

(S)

91.00±11.97

99.75±0.79

Method 2

15%

38400

25

94.80±3.29

(ZO)

95.00±4.71

95.00±4.23

     

(NF)

95.00±3.33

97.33±2.63

     

(S)

94.00±8.43

99.25±1.21

Method 3

15%

38400

9

97.80±1.14

(ZO)

98.00±2.58

99.33±1.41

     

(NF)

98.00±2.58

98.00±1.72

     

(S)

97.00±4.83

99.25±1.21

Method 4

10%

25600

13

98.20±1.99

(ZO)

98.50±2.42

99.00±2.25

     

(NF)

98.50±3.37

98.00±1.72

     

(S)

97.00±4.83

100.00±0.00

Method 5

50%

128000

425=(17×25)

98.80±1.03

(ZO)

100.00±0.00

99.00±1.61

     

(NF)

99.00±2.11

99.33±1.49

     

(S)

96.00±5.16

99.75±0.79

Method 6

45%

115200

442=(17×26)

98.40±1.26

(ZO)

100.00±0.00

99.33±1.41

     

(NF)

99.00±2.11

98.33±2.36

     

(S)

94.00±6.99

99.75±0.79

Method 7

45%

115200

42=(3×14)

98.60±0.97

(ZO)

100.00±0.00

99.00±1.61

     

(NF)

98.00±2.58

99.33±1.41

     

(S)

97.00±4.83

99.50±1.05

Method 8

40%

102400

784=(28×28)

98.80±1.03

(ZO)

100.00±0.00

99.33±1.41

     

(NF)

99.50±1.58

98.67±1.72

     

(S)

95.00±5.27

100.00±0.00

  1. Best performance obtained for the methodologies studied using the EEG database (scenario 2).