Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance of the proposed two-stage classifiers

From: A two-stage approach using Gaussian mixture models and higher-order statistics for a classification of normal and pathological voices

Method

Confusion matrix

Accuracy (%)

Specificity (%)

Sensitivity (%)

AUC (%)

GMM 8 mixtures

Mean of the normalized skewness ( Îł ÂŻ 3 )

93.75

6.25

94.00 ± 1.67

94.21

93.78

99.69

  

5.76

94.24

    
 

Mean of the normalized kurtosis ( Îł ÂŻ 4 )

93.75

6.25

94.00 ± 1.67

94.21

93.78

99.69

  

5.76

94.24

    

GMM 16 mixtures

Mean of the normalized skewness( Îł ÂŻ 3 )

95.83

4.17

96.64 ± 4.09

97.43

95.90

99.69

  

2.56

97.44

    
 

Mean of the normalize kurtosis ( Îł ÂŻ 4 )

95. 83

4. 17

96. 96 ± 4. 79

98. 04

95. 92

99. 95

  

1.92

98.08

    

GMM 32 mixtures

Mean of the normalized skewness ( Îł ÂŻ 3 )

93.75

6.25

94.64 ± 1.92

95.44

93.86

99.69

  

4.48

95.52

    
 

Mean of the normalized kurtosis ( Îł ÂŻ 4 )

95.83

4.17

96.00 ± 3.13

96.15

95.84

99.87

  

3.84

96.16

    
  1. The best performance is highlighted in bold.