Table 4 Achieved improvements for the Foreman test bench[26]
Technique | Microprocessor | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nios II/e | Nios II/s | Nios II/f | |||||||
MB 16 | MB 32 | MB 64 | MB 16 | MB 32 | MB 64 | MB 16 | MB 32 | MB 64 | |
FST | |||||||||
8 pixels | 41.72% | 41.88% | 32.23% | 20.02 % | 16.73% | 15.84% | 39.74% | 36.22% | 9.13% |
16 pixels | 42.58% | 42.90% | 33.29% | 21.08% | 18.86% | 17.91% | 50.22% | 44.96% | 11.15% |
32 pixels | 44.23% | 43.21% | 33.62% | 21.61% | 18.99% | 18.42% | 54.00% | 53.85% | 11.49% |
2DLOG | |||||||||
8 pixels | 32.35% | 27.63% | 20.63% | 8.78% | 7.25% | 4.20% | 6.36% | 5.15% | 4.13% |
16 pixels | 34.05% | 30.05% | 23.31% | 11.63% | 6.54% | 3.94% | 4.63% | 8.00% | 4.65% |
32 pixels | 35.45% | 35.46% | 25.61% | 10.11% | 10.33% | 11.24% | 5.50% | 14.91% | 5.39% |
TSST | |||||||||
8 pixels | 34.97% | 33.46% | 26.18% | 11.24% | 10.56% | 8.98% | 0.93% | 11.21% | 4.71% |
16 pixels | 34.67% | 33.14% | 26.50% | 11.11% | 9.44% | 9.52% | 4.42% | 11.21% | 4.12% |
32 pixels | 34.37% | 33.46% | 25.79% | 9.55% | 10.22% | 8.77% | ~0.00% | 11.21% | 7.39% |