Table 8 Results of performance ( Δ i in dB) and arithmetic complexity (MO) of the WED ( t , Q ) algorithms applied to the UEP codes C 1 (16,5,5) and C 2 (25,8,5)
C 1(16,5,5) | C 2(25,8,5) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q | 4 | 16 | 1024 | 4 | 16 | 1024 | |
MO | [N s − N g ] | [50 − 394] | [116 − 788] | [314 − 1,970] | [77 − 916] | [179 − 1,832] | [485 − 4,580] |
[N m − N c ] | [388 − 82] | [776 − 148] | [1,940 − 346] | [904 − 127] | [1,808 − 229] | [4,520 − 535] | |
t = 2 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 3.7 | |
t = 3 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 2.5 | |
cp1 | t = 4 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 1.4 |
t = 5 | – | – | – | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
t = 6 | – | – | – | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | |
t = 2 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 1.8 | |
t = 3 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.3 | |
cp2 | t = 4 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
t = 5 | – | – | – | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.3 | |
t = 6 | – | – | – | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.3 | |