Skip to main content

Table 10 Performance and coding efficiency comparisons of proposed algorithm with JM16.2 for IPPP frame structures (QP: 36 and 40)

From: Fast mode decision based on human noticeable luminance difference and rate distortion cost for H.264/AVC

IPPP

QP36

QP40

Video

ΔPSNR

ΔBR (%)

TS (%)

ΔPSNR

ΔBR (%)

TS (%)

Foreman

−0.048

0.590

71.001

−0.014

0.416

69.159

Grandma

−0.026

−0.091

69.908

−0.009

−0.134

69.191

M/D

−0.019

0.125

77.964

−0.017

0.163

76.295

News

−0.020

0.207

73.654

−0.053

0.160

69.475

Salesman

−0.017

0.171

69.582

−0.018

−0.016

66.516

Coastguard

−0.029

0.255

65.188

−0.023

0.235

63.963

Mobile

−0.013

0.133

62.528

−0.021

0.061

56.339

Silent

−0.039

1.455

72.915

−0.040

1.123

72.357

Stefan

−0.046

0.809

65.202

−0.032

0.989

61.525

Table

−0.066

0.854

71.772

−0.079

0.985

70.141

Stockholm

−0.026

0.201

66.854

−0.026

0.172

68.966

Parkrun

−0.005

0.191

57.046

−0.019

0.060

53.679

Average

−0.030

0.408

68.635

−0.029

0.351

66.467