Skip to main content

Table 11 Performance and coding efficiency comparisons of proposed algorithm with JM16.2 for IBBP frame structures (QP: 24, 28 and 32)

From: Fast mode decision based on human noticeable luminance difference and rate distortion cost for H.264/AVC

IBBP

QP24

QP28

QP32

Video

ΔPSNR

ΔBR (%)

TS (%)

ΔPSNR

ΔBR (%)

TS (%)

ΔPSNR

ΔBR (%)

TS (%)

Foreman

−0.042

1.475

63.239

−0.050

1.070

62.784

−0.035

1.203

62.249

Grandma

−0.053

−0.149

69.029

−0.028

0.098

65.184

−0.020

0.002

63.714

M/D

−0.070

0.357

71.674

−0.040

−0.027

70.387

−0.040

0.135

69.917

News

−0.119

0.432

74.494

−0.096

0.240

71.679

−0.070

0.295

69.317

Salesman

−0.059

0.017

70.098

−0.039

0.140

65.768

−0.050

0.099

61.848

Coastguard

−0.028

1.154

53.434

−0.024

1.100

53.252

−0.024

1.066

54.033

Mobile

0.001

0.302

57.347

−0.012

0.143

55.729

−0.012

0.221

53.987

Silent

−0.047

1.187

66.775

−0.037

1.018

64.498

−0.040

1.390

63.374

Stefan

−0.012

0.309

56.312

−0.038

0.238

56.713

−0.046

−0.194

56.569

Table

−0.042

0.674

61.757

−0.025

0.872

59.727

−0.027

1.234

60.012

Stockholm

−0.009

0.037

50.181

−0.004

0.243

50.900

−0.015

0.670

56.190

Parkrun

−0.007

0.173

49.733

−0.004

0.235

47.929

−0.009

0.225

46.140

Average

−0.041

0.497

62.006

−0.033

0.448

60.379

−0.032

0.529

59.779