Skip to main content

Table 12 Performance and coding efficiency comparisons of proposed algorithm with JM16.2 for IBBP frame structures (QP:36 and 40)

From: Fast mode decision based on human noticeable luminance difference and rate distortion cost for H.264/AVC

IBBP

QP36

QP40

Video

ΔPSNR

ΔBR (%)

TS (%)

ΔPSNR

ΔBR (%)

TS (%)

Foreman

−0.040

1.391

62.078

−0.055

1.055

61.874

Grandma

−0.014

−0.037

62.200

−0.003

−0.366

63.060

M/D

−0.023

0.300

70.107

−0.001

0.400

69.671

News

−0.052

0.292

67.040

−0.058

0.123

64.942

Salesman

−0.016

0.274

60.487

−0.048

−0.500

59.591

Coastguard

−0.024

0.538

56.398

−0.037

−0.163

58.291

Mobile

−0.012

0.182

51.636

−0.031

0.110

49.552

Silent

−0.021

1.637

63.673

−0.044

1.495

64.422

Stefan

−0.040

−0.491

56.144

−0.041

−0.610

54.846

Table

−0.047

1.366

62.423

−0.067

1.761

62.936

Stockholm

−0.017

0.357

60.261

−0.031

0.323

62.934

Parkrun

−0.009

0.370

47.350

−0.012

0.347

48.005

Average

−0.026

0.515

59.983

−0.036

0.331

60.010