Table 14 Performance and coding efficiency comparisons of proposed algorithm with[10, 18] for IPPP and IBBP frame structures
IPPP & IBBP | Zhao et al.[10] | JNDMD[18] | Proposed | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QP | ΔPSNR | ΔBR (%) | TS (%) | ΔPSNR | ΔBR (%) | TS (%) | ΔPSNR | ΔBR (%) | TS (%) |
Foreman | −0.095 | 0.81 | 58.15 | −0.024 | 1.094 | 45.602 | −0.041 | 0.928 | 65.755 |
Grandma | −0.033 | 0.30 | 62.99 | −0.005 | 0.030 | 52.867 | −0.026 | −0.105 | 67.505 |
M/D | −0.060 | 0.09 | 62.48 | −0.006 | 0.290 | 49.221 | −0.032 | 0.200 | 73.583 |
News | −0.068 | 1.42 | 61.29 | −0.025 | 0.225 | 53.393 | −0.065 | 0.205 | 72.013 |
Salesman | −0.013 | 1.50 | 61.19 | −0.012 | 0.049 | 51.257 | −0.033 | 0.033 | 67.153 |
Coastguard | −0.046 | 0.41 | 59.79 | −0.017 | 0.658 | 51.899 | −0.022 | 0.458 | 58.237 |
Mobile | −0.068 | 1.22 | 57.80 | −0.009 | 0.137 | 56.528 | −0.012 | 0.177 | 57.437 |
Silent | 0.017 | 1.54 | 58.95 | −0.014 | 1.613 | 57.761 | −0.037 | 1.248 | 68.565 |
Stefan | −0.042 | 1.79 | 51.58 | −0.028 | 0.598 | 54.126 | −0.037 | 0.324 | 59.763 |
Table | −0.033 | 0.90 | 57.99 | −0.037 | 1.349 | 56.003 | −0.045 | 0.945 | 65.253 |
Stockholm | −0.027 | −0.45 | 66.13 | −0.016 | 0.762 | 56.376 | −0.016 | 0.290 | 59.154 |
Parkrun | −0.210 | 0.17 | 55.70 | −0.008 | 0.201 | 50.269 | −0.008 | 0.203 | 51.714 |
Average | −0.057 | 0.808 | 59.503 | −0.017 | 0.584 | 52.942 | −0.031 | 0.409 | 63.844 |