EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Table 9 Performance and coding efficiency comparisons of proposed algorithm with JM16.2 for IPPP frame structures (QP: 24, 28 and 32)

From: Fast mode decision based on human noticeable luminance difference and rate distortion cost for H.264/AVC

IPPP	QP24			QP28			QP32
Video	ΔPSNR	ΔBR (%)	TS (%)	ΔPSNR	ΔBR (%)	TS (%)	ΔPSNR	ΔBR (%)	TS (%)
Foreman	−0.048	0.408	68.386	−0.042	0.702	68.226	−0.038	0.964	68.555
Grandma	−0.044	−0.365	73.561	−0.025	0.099	70.208	−0.031	−0.107	68.989
M/D	−0.060	0.166	77.486	−0.023	0.213	76.261	−0.025	0.163	76.071
News	−0.079	0.065	78.944	−0.055	0.131	76.536	−0.048	0.097	74.042
Salesman	−0.044	0.106	76.105	−0.015	0.115	72.351	−0.019	−0.077	69.184
Coastguard	−0.003	0.172	59.624	−0.009	0.136	58.840	−0.020	0.085	59.343
Mobile	−0.007	0.103	63.934	−0.002	0.206	62.538	−0.009	0.307	60.776
Silent	−0.038	0.866	74.891	−0.033	1.011	71.784	−0.027	1.299	70.962
Stefan	−0.038	0.618	63.667	−0.033	0.731	63.564	−0.040	0.838	63.081
Table	−0.022	0.263	68.944	−0.041	0.554	67.111	−0.035	0.886	67.699
Stockholm	0.001	0.437	56.966	−0.006	0.438	56.875	−0.025	0.017	61.408
Parkrun	−0.003	0.095	57.537	−0.004	0.123	55.530	−0.003	0.204	54.194
Average	−0.032	0.245	68.337	−0.024	0.372	66.652	−0.027	0.390	66.192

Back to article page