From: Overview of constrained PARAFAC models
Models
Equivalent constrained PARAFAC model
Matrix unfoldings
PARAFAC‐3
X I 1 × I 2 I 3 = A ( 1 ) ( A ( 2 ) ◇ A ( 3 ) ) T
Tucker‐3
X I 1 × I 2 I 3 = A ( 1 ) G R 1 × R 2 R 3 ( A ( 2 ) ⊗ A ( 3 ) ) T
Tucker‐(2,3)
X= I 3 , R × 1 A ( 1 ) Ψ ( 1 ) × 2 A ( 2 ) Ψ ( 2 ) × 3 G I 3 × R 1 R 2
X I 1 × I 2 I 3 = A ( 1 ) Ψ ( 1 ) ( A ( 2 ) Ψ ( 2 ) ◇ G I 3 × R 1 R 2 ) T
Ψ ( 1 ) = I R 1 ⊗ 1 R 2 T , Ψ ( 2 ) = 1 R 1 T ⊗ I R 2
PARALIND/CONFAC‐3
X= I 3 , R × 1 A ( 1 ) Φ ( 1 ) × 2 A ( 2 ) Φ ( 2 ) × 3 A ( 3 ) Φ ( 3 )
X I 1 × I 2 I 3 = A ( 1 ) Φ ( 1 ) ( A ( 2 ) Φ ( 2 ) ◇ A ( 3 ) Φ ( 3 ) ) T
= A(1)Φ(1)(Φ(2)◇Φ(3))T(A(2)⊗A(3))T
PARATUCK‐2
X= I 3 , R × 1 A ( 1 ) Ψ ( 1 ) × 2 A ( 2 ) Ψ ( 2 ) × 3 F
X I 1 × I 2 I 3 = A ( 1 ) Ψ ( 1 ) ( A ( 2 ) Ψ ( 2 ) ◇ F ) T
F=(Φ(1)◇Φ(2))Tdiag(vec(CT))
PARATUCK‐(2,4)
X= I 4 , R × 1 A ( 1 ) Ψ ( 1 ) × 2 A ( 2 ) Ψ ( 2 ) × 3 F × 4 D
X I 1 × I 2 I 3 I 4 = A ( 1 ) Ψ ( 1 ) ( A ( 2 ) Ψ ( 2 ) ◇ F ◇ C I 4 × R 1 R 2 ) T
X I 1 I 2 × I 3 I 4 =( A ( 1 ) ⊗ A ( 2 ) )
F= ( Φ ( 1 ) ◇ Φ ( 2 ) ) T ,D= C I 4 × R 1 R 2
( Φ ( 1 ) ◇ Φ ( 2 ) ) T ◇ C I 4 × R 1 R 2 T