Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance (%) comparisons of different methods on AR in size of 8 × 6 pixels

From: Class-specific kernel linear regression classification for face recognition under low-resolution and illumination variation conditions

Methods\training data

Left lighting

Right lighting

Full lighting

Average

PCA+Euclidean

41.67

34.17

8.75

28.20

PCA+Mahalanobis

40.00

32.08

22.50

31.53

KPCA-p

41.25

31.25

12.50

28.33

KPCA-g

42.42

34.58

16.67

31.22

LDA+Euclidean

74.42

44.00

50.25

56.22

LDA+Mahalanobis

52.92

34.17

54.17

46.09

KLDA-p

75.25

47.33

41.50

54.69

KLDA-g

73.50

51.75

47.17

57.47

LRC

75.33

54.08

42.00

57.14

RLRC

74.42

57.75

41.90

58.03

SRC

80.00

72.50

34.17

62.22

LPP

60.83

42.92

30.83

44.86

NPE

82.08

52.50

30.42

55.00

IPCR

41.25

31.25

8.33

26.94

URC

43.75

32.92

17.50

31.39

LDRC

75.00

48.75

55.42

59.72

LBP

61.25

55.42

46.67

54.45

KLRC-p

75.42

57.92

51.25

61.53

KLRC-g

73.75

59.17

53.75

62.22

  1. Italicized data means the proposed methods' results