Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of objective evaluation: S-CIELAB Δ E

From: Color interpolation algorithm for an RWB color filter array including double-exposed white channel

Image No.

CM1

CM2

CM3

CM4

PM

Captured img 1

13.500

6.854

9.068

6.792

3.946

2

16.642

8.882

13.194

9.884

5.903

3

9.466

5.324

6.804

4.580

3.251

4

18.804

13.493

15.592

13.947

7.839

5

14.044

7.825

9.947

7.468

4.553

Kodak test img 1

17.080

11.926

13.764

11.543

7.604

2

8.785

6.103

6.895

5.432

3.578

3

2.754

1.508

2.167

1.692

1.054

4

3.285

1.864

2.422

1.822

1.314

5

7.648

3.307

4.977

3.636

1.862

6

7.251

3.802

5.804

4.293

2.644

7

3.184

1.842

2.204

1.819

1.112

8

10.548

6.666

6.587

4.930

2.712

9

3.444

1.976

2.378

1.768

1.105

10

3.390

1.797

2.291

1.674

1.031

11

5.554

3.010

4.165

3.177

1.808

12

3.340

2.053

2.545

2.010

1.228

13

11.001

4.834

8.793

6.670

3.494

14

5.956

2.982

4.560

3.424

2.226

15

3.427

2.240

2.447

1.967

1.334

16

5.026

2.704

4.168

3.120

1.873

17

3.619

1.809

2.541

1.979

1.143

18

6.098

2.956

4.540

3.343

2.193

19

5.648

3.426

3.719

2.810

1.547

20

3.586

1.960

2.774

2.154

1.283

Avg.

5.409

2.921

3.953

2.972

1.762

  1. Boldface indicates the best results in each metric among PM and CMs