Table 3 Overall results of the proposed methods (in decreasing accuracy order)
From: A procedure to locate the eyelid position in noisy videokeratoscopic images
Rank | Filtering | Model | Fitting | Median ± MAD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | GDV | Parabola | Hough | 3.50 ± 1.37 |
2 | GDV | Rice | LAD | 3.52 ± 1.04 |
3 | GDV | Parabola | Bisquare | 3.54 ± 0.91 |
4 | GDV | Fourth-order | LAD | 3.61 ± 1.80 |
5 | GDV | Rice | Bisquare | 3.62 ± 1.37 |
6 | GDV | Parabola | LAD | 3.66 ± 1.17 |
7 | GDV | Rational | Bisquare | 3.82 ± 0.61 |
8 | GDV | Fourier | Bisquare | 3.83 ± 1.57 |
9 | GDV | Fourth-order | Bisquare | 3.91 ± 2.28 |
10 | GDV | Skew-normal | Bisquare | 4.03 ± 2.22 |
11 | GDV | Cubic | LAD | 4.04 ± 1.74 |
32 | Wavelet | Weibull | Bisquare | 4.62 ± 2.11 |
40 | Wavelet | Fréchet | Bisquare | 4.86 ± 2.27 |
42 | GDV | Dagum | LAD | 4.90 ± 1.08 |
60 | GDV | Log-logistic | LAD | 5.16 ± 2.40 |
113 | GDV | Gamma | LAD | 5.71 ± 3.03 |