Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 5 Quantitative comparison of human re-id across cameras on a quite challenging VIPeR benchmark dataset

From: Human tracking over camera networks: a review

Item no. Used human re-id method Rank on VIPeR Reference
1 10 20
1 ELF 12.00 44.00 61.00 2008 ECCV [39]
2 SDALF 19.87 49.37 65.73 2010 CVPR [40]
3 ColorInv 24.21 57.09 69.65 2013 TPAMI [41]
4 SCNCD 37.80 81.20 90.40 2014 ECCV [42]
5 LOMO + XQDA 40.00 80.51 91.08 2015 CVPR [43]
6 FFN 51.1 91.4 96.9 2016 WACV [44]
7 KISSME 19.6 62.2 77.0 2012CVPR [45]
8 LFDA 24.18 67.12 82.00 2013 CVPR [46]
9 KLFDA 32.3 79.7 90.9 2014 ECCV [47]
10 MetricEnsb 45.9 88.9 95.8 2015 CVPR [48]
11 LSSL 47.8 87.6 94.2 2016 AAAI [49]
12 SCSP 53.5 91.5 96.6 2016 CVPR [50]
  1. The cumulative matching scores (%) at rank 1, 10, and 20 are listed