Table 2 Simulation 1: 1 A, 1 B, and 1 C are the SIA for different Gaussian mixture components (GMC) for the TIMIT, SITW and NIST 2008, respectively
Methods | Mix8 | Mix16 | Mix32 | Mix64 | Mix128 | Mix256 | Mix512 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Simulation 1 A: the SIA for clean speech | |||||||
FWMFCC (f 1) | 80% | 84.17% | 89.17% | 93.33% | 93.33% | 93.33% | 94.17% |
CMVNMFCC (f 2) | 77.5% | 80.83% | 86.67% | 91.67% | 91.67% | 92.5% | 90.83% |
FWPNCC (g 1) | 60% | 71.67% | 80.83% | 86.67% | 88.33% | 90% | 90% |
CMVNPNCC (g 2) | 70% | 74.17% | 83.33% | 86.67% | 90% | 89.17% | 90.83% |
Fusion decision | (f 1- g 2) | (f 1- g 2) | (f 1- g 2) | (f 1- g 2) | (f 1- g 2) | (f 1- g 1) | (f 1- g 2) |
Fused ω 1 =0.9 | 79.17% | 84.17% | 90% | 91.67% | 93.33% | 93.33% |
|
Fused ω 2 =0.8 | 80.83% | 83.33% | 90% | 92.5% | 93.33% | 94.17% | 94.17% |
Fused ω 3 =0.77 | 80.83% | 83.33% | 90% | 92.5% | 93.33% | 94.17% | 94.17% |
Fused ω 4 =0.7 | 79.17% | 82.5% | 89.17% | 92.5% | 93.33% | 94.17% | 93.33% |
Fusion max | 77.5% | 75% | 85% | 90% | 94.17% | 93.33% | 93.33% |
Fusion mean | 78.33% | 80.83% | 90% | 92.5% | 93.33% | 94.17% | 94.17% |
Simulation 1 B: the SIA for | |||||||
FWMFCC (f 1) | 71.67% | 75% | 76.67% | 77.5% | 78.33% | 78.33% | 80% |
CMVNMFCC (f 2) | 69.17% | 74.17% | 75.83% | 78.33% | 80.83% | 80% | 79.17% |
FWPNCC (g 1) | 64.17% | 70.83% | 78.33% | 79.17% | 80.83% | 79% | 79.17% |
CMVNPNCC (g 2) | 67.5% | 73.33% | 77.5% | 78.33% | 80.83% | 80% | 80% |
Fusion decision | (f 1- g 2) | (f 1- g 2) | (f 1- g 1) | (f 2- g 1) | (f 2- g 2) | (f 2- g 2) | (f 1- g 2) |
Fused ω 1 =0.9 | 71.67% | 75.83% | 77.5% | 77.5% | 80.83% | 80.83% | 81.67% |
Fused ω 2 =0.8 | 71.67% | 74.17% | 77.5% | 77.5% | 80.83% | 80.83% | 81.67% |
Fused ω 3 =0.77 | 71.67% | 74.17% | 76.67% | 77.5% | 80.83% | 80.83% | 81.67% |
Fused ω 4 =0.7 | 71.67% | 75.83% | 75.83% | 78.33% | 80.83% | 80.83% |
|
Fusion max | 72.5% | 75% | 77.5% | 78.33% | 79.17% | 78.33% | 79.17% |
Fusion mean | 73.33% | 76.67% | 74.17% | 79.17% | 79.17% | 80% | 81.67% |
Simulation 1 C: the SIA for | |||||||
FWMFCC (f 1) | 90% | 89.17% | 92.5% |
| 93.33% | 92.5% | 94.17% |
CMVNMFCC (f 2) | 83.33% | 87.5% | 88.33% | 90.83% | 90% | 90.83% | 89.17% |
FWPNCC (g 1) | 83.33% | 86.67% | 87.5% | 87.5% | 89.17% | 88.33% | 88.33% |
CMVNPNCC (g 2) | 84.17% | 85% | 89.17% | 89.17% | 89.17% | 88.33% | 88.33% |
Fusion decision | (f 1- g 2) | (f 1- g 1) | (f 1- g 2) | (f 1- g 2) | (f 1- g 2) | (f 1- g 2) | (f 1- g 2) |
Fused ω 1 = 0.9 | 89.17% | 90.83% | 94.17% |
| 95% | 95% | 95% |
Fused ω 2 = 0.8 | 91.67% | 91.67% | 93.33% | 95% | 94.17% | 95% | 94.17% |
Fused ω 3 = 0.77 | 90.83% | 91.67% | 93.33% | 94.17% | 94.17% | 95% | 94.17% |
Fused ω 4 = 0.7 | 90.83% | 90.83% | 92.5% | 94.17% | 94.17% | 95% | 94.17% |
Fusion max | 90% | 86.67% | 93.33% | 93.33% | 92.5% | 92.5% | 91.67% |
Fusion mean | 88.33% | 90% | 90.83% | 91.67% | 92.5% | 94.17% | 92.5% |
