Skip to main content

Table 1 PSNR values of the reconstructed images using different ratios

From: Collaborating filtering using unsupervised learning for image reconstruction from missing data

Image

Method

15% missing data

25% missing data

35% missing data

Lena

FPC

46.2950

45.8888

45.6461

 

ALM

48.2790

48.2248

45.5295

 

IALM

48.2673

48.2278

46.0819

 

PPG

45.0964

41.9579

40.2865

 

PG

45.0966

41.9582

40.2863

 

SVT with power method

48.3221

48.2745

48.2295

 

Proposed approach

48.9848

48.7817

48.5952

Cameraman

FPC

28.2855

32.3433

31.7894

 

ALM

36.8075

33.9694

29.5169

 

IALM

36.7101

33.9849

29.8495

 

PPG

31.3222

27.9425

24.3797

 

PG

31.3199

27.9458

24.3757

 

SVT with power method

40.9528

40.5182

40.0158

 

Proposed approach

43.3525

42.4823

40.4596

Flinstones

FPC

28.9102

37.4826

37.2896

 

ALM

42.9923

37.3583

34.3512

 

IALM

42.8769

37.4573

34.6774

 

PPG

31.5781

29.5989

24.3693

 

PG

31.5936

29.5887

24.3708

 

SVT with power method

43.6614

43.5614

43.2075

 

Proposed approach

47.8234

47.3814

44.3920

House

FPC

28.6407

27.7999

27.4826

 

ALM

37.0989

36.4579

36.3583

 

IALM

36.8952

36.5262

36.4573

 

PPG

31.5992

29.8729

29.5998

 

PG

31.6005

29.8769

29.5701

 

SVT with power method

38.1457

38.0827

37.6494

 

Proposed approach

39.0707

38.1743

37.8234

Man

FPC

39.2493

38.5864

38.1565

 

ALM

41.3640

41.2133

40.4455

 

IALM

41.2952

41.2191

40.8616

 

PPG

39.4997

39.1895

39.3266

 

PG

39.5008

39.1889

39.3264

 

SVT with power method

42.9572

42.4158

42.0357

 

Proposed approach

44.3212

43.9939

43.6724

  1. For each test setting, six results are provided: FPC, ALM, IAM, PPG, PG, SVT with power method, and our proposed model. The best value of the PSNR is the number written in italics on each row