Fig. 9
From: Robust localization in wireless networks from corrupted signals
Performance and sensitivity in Tdst when localizing additional auxiliary node. a Configuration of wireless network. b cdf of localization errors \(~\Delta ({\widehat{\varvec{x}}})\) using 100 Monte Carlo runs for auxiliary (triangle) and passive node (circle), using the standard (blue) and robust (magenta) methods, respectively. Unknown corruption fraction is \(\epsilon ~=~15\%\) and \({\widetilde{\epsilon }}= 20\%\). c Root mean square error as a function of the fraction of corrupted data \(\epsilon\) using standard (blue) and robust (magenta) method, for passive (circles) and auxiliary (triangles) nodes, respectively. Results based on 50 Monte Carlo simulations. \({\widetilde{\epsilon }}~=~50\%\) indicated by the black-dashed line