Table 2 The comparison with other detectors in model size, computation amount, and performances (AP%)
From: Automatically search an optimal face detector for a specific deployment environment
| Â | Size | FLOPs | Easy | Medium | Hard | FDDB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TinaFace [49] | 37.48 M | 5150 G | 97.0 | 96.3 | 93.4 | 98.3 |
EXTD-32 [19] | 0.06 M | 129 G | 88.3 | 87.3 | 79.9 | 96.6 |
ASFD-D0 [3] | 0.62 M | 21.9 G | 90.1 | 87.5 | 74.4 | – |
Retina-0.25 [4] | 0.43 M | 22.0 G | 90.0 | 87.5 | 73.1 | 97.4 |
Yolov5s [25] | 7.26 M | 183 G | 87.3 | 87.9 | 83.1 | 93.5 |
LFFD [20] | 1.52 M | 201 G | 86.0 | 84.8 | 74.9 | 96.6 |
Our-small | 0.10 M | 3.99 G | 88.0 | 86.0 | 64.3 | 96.3 |
Our-large | 0.49 M | 8.20 G | 89.8 | 87.3 | 63.0 | 96.9 |