From: An innovative document image binarization approach driven by the non-local p-Laplacian
Dataset | Models | FM % | Fps % | PSNR | DRD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIBCO 2009 | Wang [10] | 77.96 | 81.42 | 14.77 | 14.71 |
Jacobs et al. [11] | 75.19 | 77.63 | 15.04 | 12.50 | |
Jacobs et al. [12] | 75.71 | 76.46 | 13.74 | 7.46 | |
Rivest-Hénault et al. [15] | 75.50 | 75.30 | 14.37 | 19.64 | |
Guo et al. [14] | 83.31 | 84.92 | 16.64 | 9.40 | |
Proposed | 88.34 | 93.03 | 17.41 | 4.98 | |
DIBCO 2010 | Wang [10] | 77.63 | 86.13 | 16.26 | 5.60 |
Jacobs et al. [11] | 49.65 | 54.84 | 14.35 | 9.75 | |
Jacobs et al. [12]. | 67.62 | 68.78 | 14.66 | 8.02 | |
Rivest-Hénault et al. [15] | 69.97 | 76.41 | 15.37 | 7.45 | |
Guo et al. [14] | 86.75 | 89.74 | 17.93 | 3.62 | |
Proposed | 88.80 | 94.46 | 18.60 | 3.06 | |
DIBCO 2011 | Wang [10] | 81.94 | 86.98 | 15.76 | 7.26 |
Jacobs et al. [11] | 73.33 | 77.26 | 14.32 | 13.92 | |
Jacobs et al. [12] | 77.90 | 74.60 | 14.68 | 6.28 | |
Rivest-Hénault et al. [15] | 69.40 | 70.19 | 12.70 | 51.25 | |
Guo et al. [14] | 83.82 | 87.32 | 16.50 | 6.55 | |
Proposed | 88.63 | 94.55 | 17.56 | 3.55 | |
DIBCO 2012 | Wang [10] | 78.22 | 83.34 | 16.25 | 7.35 |
Jacobs et al. [11] | 65.31 | 69.20 | 15.28 | 8.83 | |
Jacobs et al. [12] | 81.57 | 81.45 | 16.26 | 5.98 | |
Rivest-Hénault et al. [15] | 73.59 | 76.53 | 15.29 | 12.37 | |
Guo et al. [14] | 86.40 | 89.00 | 17.86 | 4.67 | |
Proposed | 88.89 | 93.41 | 18.81 | 3.74 | |
DIBCO 2013 | Wang [10] | 80.07 | 83.98 | 16.51 | 9.51 |
Jacobs et al. [11] | 73.66 | 77.24 | 15.98 | 9.85 | |
Jacobs et al. [12] | 77.72 | 82.34 | 16.54 | 9.20 | |
Rivest-Hénault et al. [15] | 77.33 | 78.86 | 15.81 | 11.48 | |
Guo et al. [14] | 82.35 | 85.16 | 17.37 | 8.09 | |
Proposed | 89.62 | 94.75 | 19.21 | 3.11 | |
DIBCO 2014 | Wang [10] | 79.93 | 84.78 | 16.31 | 6.34 |
Jacobs et al. [11] | 65.43 | 73.70 | 14.15 | 9.24 | |
Jacobs et al. [12] | 74.23 | 81.29 | 15.41 | 7.44 | |
Rivest-Hénault et al. [15] | 81.20 | 85.82 | 17.00 | 5.58 | |
Guo et al. [14] | 92.30 | 94.86 | 19.17 | 2.37 | |
Proposed | 92.34 | 96.03 | 19.02 | 2.55 | |
DIBCO 2016 | Wang [10] | 86.92 | 89.93 | 18.05 | 4.61 |
Jacobs et al. [11] | 79.09 | 81.13 | 16.67 | 6.13 | |
Jacobs et al. [12] | 83.25 | 87.98 | 17.66 | 5.32 | |
Rivest-Hénault et al. [15] | 83.06 | 84.43 | 16.49 | 7.27 | |
Guo et al. [14] | 88.51 | 90.46 | 18.42 | 4.13 | |
Proposed | 90.22 | 93.82 | 18.94 | 3.60 |