Skip to main content
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Table 2 Correlation coefficients of different methods

From: Estimation of LFM signal parameters using RD compressed sampling and the DFRFT dictionary

Perception matrix

μmax

μav

A1 (Method 1)

0.2620

0.1720

A2 (Method 2)

0.2471

0.0622

A3 (Method 3)

0.2456

0.0319

A4 (Method 4)

0.2351

0.0231

  1. Bold values indicate the best performance among the different methods
Back to article page