Table 1 Performance comparison of NAd implementations
Implementation | Mean with std. |
|---|---|
Python | \(213\,\text {ms} \pm 1.25\,\text {ms}\) |
Numba | \(907\,\upmu \text {s} \pm 3.98\,\upmu \text {s}\) |
Cython | \(905\,\upmu \text {s} \pm 776\,\text {ns}\) |
Implementation | Mean with std. |
|---|---|
Python | \(213\,\text {ms} \pm 1.25\,\text {ms}\) |
Numba | \(907\,\upmu \text {s} \pm 3.98\,\upmu \text {s}\) |
Cython | \(905\,\upmu \text {s} \pm 776\,\text {ns}\) |