Open Access

Modelling and Order of Acoustic Transfer Functions Due to Reflections from Augmented Objects

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing20062007:030253

Received: 30 April 2006

Accepted: 14 October 2006

Published: 21 December 2006


It is commonly accepted that the sound reflections from real physical objects are much more complicated than what usually is and can be modelled by room acoustics modelling software. The main reason for this limitation is the level of detail inherent in the physical object in terms of its geometrical and acoustic properties. In the present paper, the complexity of the sound reflections from a corridor wall is investigated by modelling the corresponding acoustic transfer functions at several receiver positions in front of the wall. The complexity for different wall configurations has been examined and the changes have been achieved by altering its acoustic image. The results show that for a homogenous flat wall, the complexity is significant and for a wall including various smaller objects, the complexity is highly dependent on the position of the receiver with respect to the objects.


ReflectionInformation TechnologyTransfer FunctionAcousticsQuantum Information


Authors’ Affiliations

Laboratory of Acoustical Imaging and Sound Control, Department of Imaging Science and Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Sonic Arts Research Centre, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK


  1. Allen JB, Berkley DA: Image method for efficiently simulating small-room acoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1979,65(4):943-950. 10.1121/1.382599View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kuttruff H: Room Acoustics. 4th edition. Spon Press, London, UK; 2000. chapter 2Google Scholar
  3. Vorländer M: Simulation of the transient and steadystate sound propagation in rooms using a new combined ray-tracing/image-source algorithm. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1989,86(1):172-178. 10.1121/1.398336View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Drumm IA, Lam YW: The adaptive beam-tracing algorithm. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2000,107(3):1405-1412. 10.1121/1.428427View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkhout AJ, de Vries D, Baan J, van den Oetelaar BW: A wave field extrapolation approach to acoustical modeling in enclosed spaces. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1999,105(3):1725-1733. 10.1121/1.426710View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Dalenbäck B-IL: Room acoustic prediction based on a unified treatment of diffuse and specular reflection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1996,100(2):899-909. 10.1121/1.416249View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Dalenbäck B-IL: Verification of prediction based on randomized tail-corrected cone-tracing and array modeling. Proceedings of the 137th ASA Meeting, 2nd Convention of the European Acoustics Association and 25th German Acoustics DAGA Conference, March 1999, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  8. Embrechts JJ: Broad spectrum diffusion model for room acoustics ray-tracing algorithms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2000,107(4):2068-2081. 10.1121/1.428489View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Lam YW: A comparison of three diffuse reflection modeling methods used in room acoustics computer models. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1996,100(4):2181-2192. 10.1121/1.417927View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Torres RR, Svensson UP, Kleiner M: Computation of edge diffraction for more accurate room acoustics auralization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2001,109(2):600-610. 10.1121/1.1340647View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Svensson UP, Fred RI, Vanderkooy J: An analytic secondary source model of edge diffraction impulse responses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1999,106(5):2331-2344. 10.1121/1.428071View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Farina A: Introducing the surface diffusion and edge scattering in a pyramid-tracing numerical model for room acoustics. Proceedings of the 108th Audio Engineering Society Convention (AES '00), February 2000, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuster M, de Vries D, Hulsebos EM, Gisolf A: Acoustic imaging in enclosed spaces: analysis of room, geometry modifications on the impulse response. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2004,116(4):2126-2137. 10.1121/1.1785591View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. de Vries D, Joeman N, Schreurs E: Measurement-based simulation and analysis of scattering structures. Proceedings of the Forum Acusticum, August 2005, Budapest, HungaryGoogle Scholar
  15. Verschuur DJprivate communication, 2006Google Scholar
  16. Tygel M, Schleicher J, Hubral P: A unified approach to 3-D seismic reflection imaging, part II: theory. Geophysics 1996,61(3):759-775. 10.1190/1.1444002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Start EW, Valstar VG, de Vries D: Application of spatial bandwidth reduction in wave field synthesis. Proceedings of the 98th Audio Engineering Society Convention, February 1995, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  18. de Vries D, Kuster M, Hulsebos E: Analyzing the influence of design modification on the room response by acoustical imaging. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Room Acoustics: Design and Science (RADS '04), April 2004, Hyogo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  19. Levy EC: Complex-curve fitting. IRE Transactions on Automatic Control 1959,4(3):37-44. 10.1109/TAC.1959.1104874View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Haneda Y, Makino S, Kaneda Y: Common acoustical pole and zero modeling of room transfer functions. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 1994,2(2):320-328. 10.1109/89.279281View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Mourjopoulos J, Paraskevas MA: Pole and zero modeling of room transfer functions. Journal of Sound and Vibration 1991,146(2):281-302. 10.1016/0022-460X(91)90764-BView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Karjalainen M, Paatero T, Mourjopoulos JN, Hatziantoniou PD: About room response equalization and dereverberation. Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA '05), October 2005, New Paltz, NY, USA 183-186.Google Scholar
  23. Schroeder MR: Statistical parameters of the frequency response curves of large rooms. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 1987,35(5):299-306.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Schönle M, Zölzer U, Fliege M: Modeling of room impulse responses by multirate systems. Proceedings of the 93rd Audio Engineering Society Convention, October 1992, San Francisco, Calif, USAGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenfield R, Hawksford MO: Efficient filter design for loudspeaker equalization. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 1991,39(10):739-751.Google Scholar


© M. Kuster and D. de Vries 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.