Skip to content


  • Research Article
  • Open Access

Lossless Compression Schemes for ECG Signals Using Neural Network Predictors

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing20072007:035641

  • Received: 24 May 2006
  • Accepted: 11 March 2007
  • Published:


This paper presents lossless compression schemes for ECG signals based on neural network predictors and entropy encoders. Decorrelation is achieved by nonlinear prediction in the first stage and encoding of the residues is done by using lossless entropy encoders in the second stage. Different types of lossless encoders, such as Huffman, arithmetic, and runlength encoders, are used. The performances of the proposed neural network predictor-based compression schemes are evaluated using standard distortion and compression efficiency measures. Selected records from MIT-BIH arrhythmia database are used for performance evaluation. The proposed compression schemes are compared with linear predictor-based compression schemes and it is shown that about 11% improvement in compression efficiency can be achieved for neural network predictor-based schemes with the same quality and similar setup. They are also compared with other known ECG compression methods and the experimental results show that superior performances in terms of the distortion parameters of the reconstructed signals can be achieved with the proposed schemes.


  • Neural Network
  • Quantum Information
  • Efficiency Measure
  • Compression Method
  • Reconstructed Signal

Authors’ Affiliations

Center for Multimedia Computing, Faculty of Information Technology, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, 63100, Malaysia


  1. Jalaleddine SMS, Hutchens CG, Strattan RD, Coberly WA: ECG data compression techniques—a unified approach. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1990,37(4):329-343. 10.1109/10.52340Google Scholar
  2. Stearns SD, Tan L-Z, Magotra N: Lossless compression of waveform data for efficient storage and transmission. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1993,31(3):645-654. 10.1109/36.225531Google Scholar
  3. Dony RD, Haykin S: Neural network approaches to image compression. Proceedings of the IEEE 1995,83(2):288-303. 10.1109/5.364461Google Scholar
  4. Rizvi SA, Wang L-C, Nasrabadi NM: Neural network architectures for vector prediction. Proceedings of the IEEE 1996,84(10):1513-1528. 10.1109/5.537115Google Scholar
  5. Logeswaran R, Eswaran C: Performance survey of several lossless compression algorithms for telemetry applications. International Journal of Computers and Applications 2001,23(1):1-9.Google Scholar
  6. Sayood K: Introduction to Data Compression. 3rd edition. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, Calif, USA; 2006.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Aydin MC, Cetin AE, Koymen H: ECG data compression by sub-band coding. Electronics Letters 1991,27(4):359-360. 10.1049/el:19910227Google Scholar
  8. Tai SC: Six-band sub-band coder on ECG waveforms. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 1992,30(2):187-192.Google Scholar
  9. Istepanian RSH, Hadjileontiadis LJ, Panas SM: ECG data compression using wavelets and higher order statistics methods. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 2001,5(2):108-115. 10.1109/4233.924801Google Scholar
  10. Lee H, Buckley KM: ECG data compression using cut and align beats approach and 2-D transforms. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1999,46(5):556-564. 10.1109/10.759056Google Scholar
  11. Rajoub BA: An efficient coding algorithm for the compression of ECG signals using the wavelet transform. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2002,49(4):355-362. 10.1109/10.991163Google Scholar
  12. Alshamali A, Al-Fahoum AS: Comments on "An efficient coding algorithm for the compression of ECG signals using the wavelet transform". IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2003,50(8):1034-1037. 10.1109/TBME.2003.814531Google Scholar
  13. Djohan A, Nguyen TQ, Tompkins WJ: ECG compression using discrete symmetric wavelet transform. Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Annual Conference of Engineering in Medicine and Biology (IEMBS '95), September 1995, Montreal, Que, Canada 1: 167–168.Google Scholar
  14. Cârdenas-Barrera JL, Lorenzo-Ginori JV: Mean-shape vector quantizer for ECG signal compression. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1999,46(1):62-70. 10.1109/10.736756Google Scholar
  15. Miaou S-G, Yen H-L, Lin C-L: Wavelet-based ECG compression using dynamic vector quantization with tree codevectors in single codebook. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2002,49(7):671-680. 10.1109/TBME.2002.1010850Google Scholar
  16. Koski A: Lossless ECG encoding. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 1997,52(1):23-33. 10.1016/S0169-2607(96)01779-8Google Scholar
  17. Giurcǎneanu CD, Tǎbuş I, Mereuţǎ Ş: Using contexts and R-R interval estimation in lossless ECG compression. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2002,67(3):177-186. 10.1016/S0169-2607(01)00126-2Google Scholar
  18. Stearns SD: Arithmetic coding in lossless waveform compression. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1995,43(8):1874-1879. 10.1109/78.403346Google Scholar
  19. Witten IH, Neal RM, Cleary JG: Arithmetic coding for data compression. Communications of the ACM 1987,30(6):520-540. 10.1145/214762.214771Google Scholar
  20. Moffat A, Neal RM, Witten IH: Arithmetic coding revisited. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 1998,16(3):256-294. 10.1145/290159.290162Google Scholar
  21. Moody GB: MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database CD-ROM. 3rd edition. Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, Mass, USA; 1997.Google Scholar
  22. Hagan MT, Menhaj MB: Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 1994,5(6):989-993. 10.1109/72.329697Google Scholar
  23. Hagan MT, Demuth HB, Beale M: Neural Network Design. Thomson Learning, Boston, Mass, USA; 1996.Google Scholar
  24. Zigel Y, Cohen A, Katz A: The weighted diagnostic distortion (WDD) measure for ECG signal compression. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2000,47(11):1422-1430. 10.1109/TBME.2000.880093Google Scholar
  25. Ishijima M: Fundamentals of the decision of optimum factors in the ECG data compression. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems 1993,E76-D(12):1398-1403.Google Scholar
  26. Al-Fahoum AS: Quality assessment of ECG compression techniques using a wavelet-based diagnostic measure. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 2006,10(1):182-191. 10.1109/TITB.2005.855554Google Scholar
  27. Wei J-J, Chang C-J, Chou N-K, Jan G-J: ECG data compression using truncated singular value decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 2001,5(4):290-299. 10.1109/4233.966104Google Scholar
  28. Bradie B: Wavelet packet-based compression of single lead ECG. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1996,43(5):493-501. 10.1109/10.488797Google Scholar
  29. Benzid R, Marir F, Boussaad A, Benyoucef M, Arar D: Fixed percentage of wavelet coefficients to be zeroed for ECG compression. Electronics Letters 2003,39(11):830-831. 10.1049/el:20030560Google Scholar
  30. Lu Z, Kim DY, Pearlman WA: Wavelet compression of ECG signals by the set partitioning in hierarchical trees algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2000,47(7):849-856. 10.1109/10.846678Google Scholar
  31. Hilton ML: Wavelet and wavelet packet compression of electrocardiograms. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1997,44(5):394-402. 10.1109/10.568915Google Scholar
  32. Zigel Y, Cohen A, Katz A: ECG signal compression using analysis by synthesis coding. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2000,47(10):1308-1316. 10.1109/10.871403Google Scholar
  33. Shannon CE: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 1948, 27: 379–423.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Gallagher RG: Variations on a theme by Huffman. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1978,24(6):668-674. 10.1109/TIT.1978.1055959MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Sayed AH: Fundamentals of Adaptive Filtering. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 2003.Google Scholar
  36. Haykin S: Adaptive Filter Theory. 4th edition. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA; 2002.MATHGoogle Scholar


© R. Kannan and C. Eswaran. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.