 Research Article
 Open Access
 Published:
Analysis and Properties of TimeVarying Modified DFT Filter Banks
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing volume 2010, Article number: 342865 (2010)
Abstract
We provide a comprehensive analysis of the timevarying modified DFT (MDFT) filter bank based on the general timevarying filter bank theories (Wang, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009) in both the time domain and frequency domain. We give firstly the description of the timeinvariant MDFT filter bank including its perfect reconstruction (PR) condition, its mechanism of aliasing error cancellation and the relationship with the cosinemodulated filter bank in detail. Then, the timevarying MDFT filter bank is analyzed according to the timedomain description. Finally, the window switching method is introduced to design the prototype filter in the timevarying MDFT filter bank with examples. The error analysis shows that the introduced design approach is useful in practice.
1. Introduction
Modified DFT filter banks (MDFT) and their applications are intensively studied in [1–5]. But all analyses are done in the frequency domain for the timeinvariant modified DFT filter banks. In the literature, we do not find any works for the timevarying MDFT filter bank. Subband coding is a widely used method in the digital signal processing and the telecommunication areas, such as subband speech and audio coding [5–7], TDMFDM multiplex [8], DSL communication [9], and subband adaptive filtering [10]. One of the important parts in a subband system is the analysis synthesis filter bank. The analysis filter bank is used to split the input frequency into the different subbands while the synthesis filter bank combines all subbands signals to generate a full band signal.
Among the different subband filter bank structures the modulated filter banks are most popular because of their easy design and efficient implementation. Historically, there are two classes of modulated filter banks, namely, DFT polyphase filter bank and cosinemodulated filter bank. DFT polyphase filter bank was first proposed by Bellangerr and Daguet [8]. DFT polyphase filter bank uses complex modulation. But, the original DFT polyphase filter bank does not provide the mechanism to cancel the adjacent spectrum aliasing. So, in some literatures, the DFT polyphase filter bank was considered as unsuitable for subband applications [11, 12], which also has negative effects on the further research of the DFT polyphase filter bank. To find a method to design the filter bank efficiently, in 1980s the QMF filter bank consisting of two channels and providing the almost perfect reconstruction was introduced. Later, the cosinemodulated filter banks with perfect reconstruction were introduced. Since the introduction, the cosinemodulated filter bank was widely studied and applied due to its perfect reconstruction property and the easy prototype window design with the closed formulation [12]. But, the closed prototype window formulation exists just in the case that the filter length is two times or four times of the channel length, which limits the application of the cosinemodulated filter bank. Without the closed formulation of prototype windows, it is difficult to design an applicable prototype window for a cosinemodulated filter bank to keep the perfect reconstruction property. In this case the cosinemodulated filter bank can only provide an almost perfect reconstruction similar with DFT polyphase filter bank.
In comparison with cosinemodulated filter banks, the DFT polyphase filter bank has advantages such as linear phase, complexvalued signal processing, and better frequency characteristics in each subband. Furthermore, its computational efficiency is comparable with cosinemodulated filter bank. So, if we can find an approach to efficiently cancel the aliasing error in the DFT polyphase filter bank, the DFT polyphase filter bank has good application possibilities in digital signal processing like speech and image processing. In 1990s, the good application prospects of the DFT polyphase filter bank motivate some researchers to find a mechanism to cancel the aliasing error in the DFT polyphase filter bank. In 1993, Fliege proposed an approach to cancel the aliasing error [1–3]. He called the modified filter bank as modified DFT filter bank (MDFT). The first application of the MDFT filter bank in lowrate speech coding is found in [5], where the MDFT filter bank is used in a 16 kbit/s speech coder and the simulation showed a good code performance.
The MDFT filter bank proposed by Fliege belongs to timeinvariant QMF filter banks. The channel number and subband filters do not change with time. In speech, audio and image processing, the timevarying filter bank can be used to adjust the input signal properties in order to get better processing performance [6, 7, 9, 10]. In the past, we have done a systematic research for the general timevarying filter bank including timevarying cosinemodulated filter banks [13–15]. In this paper, we want to use the established timevarying filter bank theory to analyze the timevarying MDFT filter bank (TVMDFT), and investigate the properties of the MDFT filter bank in the case that its filter coefficients change with time. We want to also study the prototype filter design for a linear timevarying MDFT filter bank. After instruction Section 2 provides the description of the MDFT filter bank and its mechanism of aliasing error cancellation in both the time and frequency domain. Section 3 analyzes the timevarying MDFT filter bank including its PR condition and the relationship with timevarying cosinemodulated filter bank. In Section 4, the design of the prototype window filter for TVMDFT is discussed. The wellknow window switching method used in timevarying cosinemodulated filter bank [13] will be used in the prototype window design for TVMDFT. Section 5 summarizes the main results of the paper.
2. MDFT Filter Bank
In [1], the mechanism of the alias cancellation in MDFT filter banks is just described in the frequency domain. Furthermore, the description in [1] seems not to be easy to understand. Here, we try to provide a clear mathematical description of the principle for an MDFT filter bank in both frequency and time domain.
2.1. In the Frequency Domain
Figure 1 shows an channel MDFT filter bank, where is even. In the MDFT filter bank, the subband filters in both analysis and synthesis sides are derived from a linear phase FIR prototype filter by complex modulation. In the analysis side,
The corresponding impulse response reads as
where and is called prototype window function or prototype filter.
In the synthesis side, the synthesis subband filters are defined similarly as
The impulse response of the synthesis filters is given by
In order to cancel the aliasing errors in the filter band system showed in Figure 1 and achieve the perfect reconstruction, three key operations are introduced in the MDF filter banks [1].
Operation 1
Band limitation of the prototype filter to .
Operation 2
Separate each channel into two subchannels with twostep decimation plus interchanged real and imaginary operation.
Operation 3
Introduction of sample delays in real or imaginary part in each subchannel interchangeably.
Each of the three operations has its own contribution to alias cancellation in the MDF filter bank. The delay of the first subband will be done in the synthesis side, while the delay of the second subchannel in the analysis side. This is the key operation to cancel the adjacent aliasing spectrum.
The band limitation condition can be expressed as
The purpose of this condition is to limit the alias errors in the adjacent bands around the analysis subband. In the following, based on the defined condition and key operations we give the detailed analysis of the outputinput relationship of an MDFT filter bank in the frequency domain and show how to use the above operations to cancel the alias components in the MDFT filter bank.
It is well known that the output signal in an channel maximally decimated timeinvariant filter bank system can be formulated as
where indicates the channel number. For an MDFT modulated filter bank, substituting (1) and (3) into (6), we get
Using the band limitation condition, (7) can be further simplified as
From (8), we can see that the contribution of the th channel to the output signal consists of three parts, the output through th channel , the alias component in th channel , and the alias component in the th channel .
To cancel the alias components in the adjacent channels, the band limitation is not sufficient. We need still Operations 2 and 3. Operation 2 defines the twostep decimation, real and imaginary operation on the analysis filter output. The goal of the real and imaginary operation is to introduce the mirror spectra in the th channel.Operation 3 introduces a sign factor in the first subchannel of each channel in order to move the alias component caused by the adjacent channels. In Figure 1, if we observe the signal in the synthesis side and take the delays in the synthesis side into account, we can write the real part of as
Considering the fact that the signal is got after downsampling and upsampling, so, just the values of at are not equal to zero and the other values of are zero, which means that . Therefore, can be expressed as
In the transform domain, we have
Note that the sign factor is introduced by delays in the synthesis side. This sign factor is independent of real and imaginary operation. So, all first subchannels in Figure 1, no matter the real and imaginary parts, have the sign factor .
The imaginary part of is coming from the contribution of the second subchannel in the th channel. From Figure 1, we have the imaginary part of
where is the imaginary unit. Different from the first subchannel, in the second subchannel of the th channel, the delays appear in the output of analysis filters. So, after downsampling and upsampling we get the nozero values in the second subchannel just at , which means that . Considering the delay effects, we get
In the transform domain, we have
where there is no sign factor. In general, the second subchannel in Figure 1 has no sign factor.
To declare the mechanism of the adjacent spectrum cancellation in an MDFT filter bank, similar to [1], we suppose that the input spectrum lies between the center frequency of the th and th channel showed in Figure 2. Note that the position of the input spectrum has no influence on the results.
In Figure 2, the component describes the mirror spectrum (M) with respect to the original spectrum (O) about the center frequency of the th channel because can be written as , while is equal to . AO denotes the alias component due to the shift version of the original spectrum in the th channel. AM denotes the alias component caused by the shift version of the mirror spectrum in the th channel.
In the following description, we suppose that is an even number. The result is suitable also for the case of odd . If the is even, using (11) we get the real part of the th channel output in Figure 1 as
where is the alias component from the th channel (AO), while is the alias component in the th channel (AM). Both parts are coming from the real subchannels in th and th channels. From Figure 1, we know that the real subchannel in both th and th channels belongs to second subchannel which has no channel number dependent sign factor because the delays are done in the analysis filters. So, the sign of the AO and AM components in (15) is positive. Similarly, the imaginary part of has three contributions from imaginary subchannels in th, th and th channels. Based on (14), we have
where
are the alias components coming from the imaginary subchannels in th and th subchannels, respectively. The sign factor is introduced because both imaginary subchannels belong to the second subchannel where the delays happen in the synthesis side. Up to now, we can better understand why the real and imaginary subchannels must be interchanged. This is exactly the requirement from alias cancellation.
For the even , adding (15) and (16) we get
In (18), there is still one alias component needed to be canceled, that is, the alias of the mirror spectrum lying in the th channel. Using the similar derivation for , we get the output in the th channel for the input and the mirror spectrum in th channel as
where the mirror alias component has minus sign because the sign factor in(16) is positive after replacing with in (16), that is, . Adding (18), and (19) we get the reconstruction output
Defining
equation (20) can be written as
In the frequency domain, we get
A perfect MDFT filter bank requires that must be constant and should be linear function of variable . If the prototype filter has linear phase, we have possibility to satisfy the requirement. Based on [16], a linear phase FIR filter can be described as
where is the filter length, is real function for . Using (24), we can write as
If
which means that if the frequency response of the prototype filter is power complementary, we can get the reconstructed signal without distortion. From [16], we know that a linear phase FIR filter can only have two nonzero filter coefficients if the power complementary condition given in (23) must be at the same time satisfied. Such a linear phase FIR filter has worse frequency characteristics and is not useful. Another prototype window is introduced in [1], which is derived from an ideal transform function consisting of a square root raisedcosine function and satisfying the power complementary condition (23). But such a prototype window is infinite and noncausal. To make it useful, the truncation and time shift must be done on the prototype window. The finite prototype window is no more power complementary. So, in practice, the condition (23) needs to be given up by designing the prototype filter for an MDFT filter bank. However, it is possible to keep the amplitude distortion arbitrarily small by designing the prototype filter [2].
2.2. In the Time Domain
To make the analysis in the time domain possible, we need to use another structure of the MDFT filter bank, namely, structure with two filter banks without real and imaginary operation shown in Figure 3.
The filter bank in Figure 3 is a 2channel oversampling filter bank with factor 2. The analysis filter in can be described as
where is the imaginary unit. The analysis filters in the have the form
The synthesis filter is defined by
where . Suppose that the analysis and synthesis filters have length . In order to describe the MDFT filter bank in the time domain, we need to define the following matrices:
where , , and .
For analysis of the MDFT filter bank in the time domain, we define two infinite matrices and as
and are called analysis and synthesis matrices and describe the relationship of the MDFT analysis and synthesis filter bank coefficients during the filter bank operation in the time domain. These two infinite matrices are the basis for the analysis of MDFT filter bank in the time domain. Using the matrices (31)(33) and (34)(35), we can describe the MDFT filter bank operation in the time domain as
where and are the input and output vectors defined, respectively, by
It is clear that the perfect reconstruction (PR) condition for the MDFT filter bank is
where is an infinite unit matrix. Together with (26), we have the following theorem.
Theorem 1.
The following PR conditions are equivalent for an MDFT filter bank

(1)
,,

(2)
.
2.3. Relationship with CosineModulated Filter Bank
If we remove the imaginary channels in Figure 1, the channel number in and reduces to . Then, an MDFT filter bank becomes a critically decimated channel filter bank with real filter coefficients. The filter definitions in (27) and (28) can be simplified as
where . After removing the imaginary channels in the MDFT filter bank, the mechanism described above for alias cancellation does not work, because the sign factor introduced by delays has no contribution to alias cancellation. So, the two stages sampling and delays make no sense. Removing the delay in Figure 3, we get an channel cosinemodulated filter bank in Figure 4.
The filters in Figure 4 are defined as
From [11, 13], we know that it is possible to get a perfectly reconstructed cosinemodulated filter bank if the phase is properly selected. It is clear that the phase does not get perfect reconstruction. One possible that leads to a perfectly reconstructed cosinemodulated filter bank is [13]
3. Design of MDFT Filter Bank
The design of the MDFT filter bank is based on Theorem 1. Using the PR condition (2) in Theorem 1, the design can be formulated as the following equation
where e is the error vector. The design is an optimization process to find the filter coefficients in at the minimal error point. This optimization needs a large computation efforts. So, it is not the first choice for the MDFT filter bank design.
Another method is to use the PR condition (1) in Theorem 1. Here we can use the design approach of the FIR filter, where the filter coefficients of an ideal lowpass filter are first got through inverse transform. Then, the FIR filter coefficients are attained by windowing the infinite idea low pass filter coefficients. A possible ideal prototype filter satisfying the power complementary is the square root raisedcosine function defined by [2]
where is the cutoff frequency. For an MDFT filter bank, is equal to . is the rolloff factor and decides the weight of transient band of the filter. is ideal for an MDFT filterbank because
Through inverse transform of we have the impulse response function of the prototype filter as [2]
An MDFT filter bank with has perfect reconstruction. But is infinite and noncausal. So, is unrealisable. To get the realisable and causal prototype filter, we can simply truncate and shift the function . After truncating and time shifting, we have
where is the prototype filter length. From [2], we know that it is possible to keep the aliasing distortion arbitrarily small by selecting the rolloff factor and the window function . Figure 5 shows the examples of the transfer function and its corresponding truncating impulse response function with rolloff factor and , respectively.
4. TimeVarying MDFT Filter Bank
The general timevarying filter bank is studied in [14, 15]. In [13], the timevarying cosinemodulated filter bank is analyzed. The window switching methods are introduced to design the timevarying cosinemodulated filter bank. The MDFT filter bank is same as the cosinemodulated filter bank in that both filter banks are got through modulation of a prototype filter. The difference is that cosinemodulated filter banks use a cosine function as the modulation function while the modulator in the MDFT filter bank is complex valued. So, the window switching methods can also be used in design of MDFT filter banks. In the following, we give firstly the description of a timevarying MDFT filter bank with focus on an channel timevarying filter bank. Then, the window switching methods are used to design the channel timevarying filter bank.
4.1. Description of TimeVarying MDFT Filter Bank
Similar to that in [15], we define an channel timevarying MDFT filter bank as the MDFT filter bank whose analysis and synthesis filter coefficients are varying with the index , where is the integer part of . Figure 6 shows an channel timevarying MDFT filter bank.
The filter coefficients in (27)(28) become
where is the timevarying prototype filter. is defined as
and have the similar definitions. The timevarying analysis matrix has the form
Similarly, replacing and with and in (35) we have the timevarying synthesis matrix
The PR condition of the timevarying MDFT filter bank is
The power complementary condition at each time index does not make sure that the timevarying MDFT filter bank has a PR property. We know that the convolution rule in a timeinvariant system does not exist in a timevarying system [14]. So, the frequencydomain analysis method for the aliasing cancellation described in Section 2 cannot be used for analyzing the timevarying MDFT filter banks. The timedomain analysis method is more efficient for the timevarying filter bank analysis and design.
4.2. Design of TimeVarying MDFT Filter Banks
The basis of filter bank design is its PR condition. In the timeinvariant case, we can use the power complementary condition (38) to design the timeinvariant MDFT filter bank. But, the power complementary condition does not exist for the timevarying MDFT filter bank. So, the only useful design condition is the PR condition (52). The general design approach for a timevarying filter bank is introduced in [17]. In [17], the least squares (LS) solution is provided to calculate the synthesis filter coefficients in the transient period from one MDFT filter bank to another MDFT filter bank. But, the LS solution needs the calculation of the inverse matrix. In [13], a window switching method is introduced to design the timevarying cosinemodulated filter bank, where the prototype filter impulse response function or the prototype window function in the transient period is got through changing the pieces of window based on the prototype windows before and after changing at the time . The window switching method does not need any calculation. It is quite useful for the design of timevarying filter bank with modulation of the prototype filter because in such a filter bank system the filter coefficients are described by prototype filter. We just need to design the prototype window function at each time index . In the following, we give an example to describe how to design the timevarying MDFT filter bank using window switching methods.
Before using window switching methods to design the prototype filter, we need to know the restrictions that the PR condition imposes on the prototype filter . We define following matrices:
where
where , , and .
Using matrices (54)–(58), we can write the analysis matrix in (48) as
Similarly, we have
According to the PR condition in (52), we get the following equations:
where , . I is the unit matrix. Substituting (61)(62) into (63)(64), we have
To simplify the above equations, we need to select (), so that
It is clear that the definitions in (54)–(57) do not satisfy the condition (66). Therefore, a timevarying MDFT filter bank that has the prototype filter with limited length cannot be perfectly reconstructed. However, it is possible to get the small distortion using the window switching methods, which can be achieved through keeping the prototype window as soon as possible by switching the windows in the transient periods.
In the following we give an example to describe how to design the timevarying MDFT filter bank using window switching methods. Suppose that at time we want to switch from an MDFT filter bank with rolloff factor to another MDFT filter bank with rolloff factor . The prototype windows are showed in Figures 5(c) and 5(d), respectively. We first represent the analysis matrix around using block diagram schematically in Figure 7.
From Figure 7, we can see that the reconstructed signal at each time point in this example is related to two analysis filter banks after this time point, which means that the filter bank change at time point has impact on the reconstructed signals at time point and . Since time point the MDFT filter bank uses the new filter bank. The filter bank at time point is the bridge from the old filter bank to the new filter bank. So, we need to decide the prototype filters at in order to keep the small distortions due to the filter bank switching. According to the principle that the prototype filters in the transient period should contain the prototype filters before and after switching, we can simply keep the window pieces in the second part of the prototype window at time point and replace the window pieces in the first part. Using this method we get the window matrices around , where the window matrix is attained through replacing the blocks in Figure 7 with the corresponding prototype windows (see Figure 8).
To show the advantage of the introduced prototype window design method in comparison with the direct switching, we define two matrices around the time index for the above example based on the and definitions in (50), (51), and the graphical representation in Figure 7 as
Suppose that the MDFT filter banks before and after the time point have very small alias errors which can be considered as zero. Multiplying matrices in (67) and (68), we get alias matrix
where and ( represent the alias errors introduced by the transition period from to . For a perfectly reconstructed timevarying MDFT filter bank and , where is the unit matrix. The other alias matrices should be zero. To show that the alias errors using window switching methods are smaller than that alias errors in the direct switch, we rewrite the matrices and based on the window switching methods as
The corresponding alias error matrix reads
To measure the alias error, we define the average signaltonoise rate (AVSNR) as
where and are the row vectors in and , respectively. is the row vector of the following matrix
Simulation results show that
So, we say that the window switching design method can reduce the alias errors in the transition period than the direct switch.
The simulation is done in Matlab. The prototype filter coefficients are calculated according to (45) with rolloff factor and , respectively. The filter bank coefficients are attained using (27)–(30). The MDFT filter banks before time have prototype filter with rolloff factor 0.3. After time , the prototype filter of the MDFT filter banks has the rolloff factor .
Here, we have some remarks on the structure in matrices (70) and (71). The matrix is the synthesis matrix, and the matrix is the analysis matrix. In all coefficients are coming from the MDFT filter bank at time , which means that the synthesis filter bank does not need to be redesigned during the transition period. We need just to redesign the analysis filter banks. This can reduce the design complexity. Based on the principle of window switching methods, at time the prototype window pieces in the first half part should be replaced by the prototype window in the second half part at time . But this principle is a general principle. In the concrete application, we should make some adjustments. From Figure 3 we know that an MDFT filter bank consists of two filter banks with sample delays of each other. The prototype window in the window matrix in Figure 7 has also sample delays, which leads to that one piece of prototype window at time is involved in the filter bank operation at time . So, we need to replace in (71) with to make the matrix element in (72) equal to I. Similarly, we need to replace in (71) with to make sure that the alias error .
5. Conclusion
In this paper, we have analyzed the timevarying MDFT filter bank in detail in both frequency and time domain. The mechanism of the aliasing cancellation for the timeinvariant MDFT is presented. The PR conditions for the timevarying and timeinvariant MDFT filter banks are given. For the design of timevarying MDFT filter banks, we used the window switching methods. The example shows that the window switching method is simple and useful, in particular for the design of timevarying filter banks with modulation, such as timemodulated cosine filter bank and timevarying MDFT filter bank.
References
 1.
Fliege NT: Modified DFT polyphase SBC filter banks with almost perfect recomstruction. Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP '94), April 1994
 2.
Fliege NJ: Closed form design of prototype filters for linear phase DFT polyphase filter banks. Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May 1994 651654.
 3.
Fliege NJ: Computational efficiency of modified DFT polyphase filter banks. Proceedings of the 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, November 1993 12961300.
 4.
Karp T, Fliege NJ: Modified DFT filter banks with perfect reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II 1999, 46(11):14041414. 10.1109/82.803480
 5.
Wang G: Analysis of quantization errors in subband speech coding with modified DFT filter banks. Signal Processing 2006, 86(2):341352. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2005.05.018
 6.
ISO/IEC JTCI/SC29 : Information technologycoding of moving pictures and associated audio for digital storage media at up to about 1.5 Mbit/sIS 111723 (audio). 1992
 7.
Shlien S: The modulated lapped transform, its timevarying forms, and its applications to audio coding standards. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 1997, 5(4):359366. 10.1109/89.593311
 8.
Bellangerr MG, Daguet JL: TDMFDM Transmultiplexer: Digital Polyphase and FFT. IEEE Transactions on Comunnication 1974, 22: 11991294. 10.1109/TCOM.1974.1092391
 9.
Yue R, Vorobyov SA, Gershman AB: Adaptive OFDM techniques with onebitpersubcarrier channelstate feedback. IEEE Transactions on Communications 2006, 54(11):19932003.
 10.
Sandeep Pradhan S, Reddy VU: A new approach to subband adaptive filtering. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1999, 47(3):655664. 10.1109/78.747773
 11.
Vaidyanathan PP: Multirate digital filters, filter banks, polyphase networks, and applications: a tutorial. Proceedings of the IEEE 1990, 78(1):5693. 10.1109/5.52200
 12.
Malvar HS: Signal Processing with Lapped Transforms. Artech House, Boston, Mass, USA; 1992.
 13.
Wang G: Timevarying cosinemodulated filter banks. Digital Signal Processing 2005, 15(3):237254. 10.1016/j.dsp.2004.09.007
 14.
Wang G: The most general timevarying filter bank and timevarying lapped transforms. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2006, 54(10):37753789.
 15.
Wang G: Analysis of Mchannel timevarying filter banks. Digital Signal Processing 2008, 18(2):127147. 10.1016/j.dsp.2007.02.006
 16.
Heute U: Noise reduction. In Topics in Acoustic Echo and Noise Control. Edited by: Haensler E, Schmidt G. Springer, Berlin, Germany; 2006:325384.
 17.
Vaidyanathan PP: Multirate Systems and Filter Banks, Signal Processing Series. PrenticeHall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA; 1993.
 18.
Wang G: Timevarying discretetime signal expansions as timevarying filter banks. IET Signal Processing 2009, 3(5):353367. 10.1049/ietspr.2008.0049
Acknowledgment
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 61071195).
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, G., Zhang, Z. & Chen, Q. Analysis and Properties of TimeVarying Modified DFT Filter Banks. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2010, 342865 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/342865
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/342865
Keywords
 Filter Bank
 Filter Coefficient
 Prototype Filter
 Synthesis Filter
 Aliasing Error