- Research Article
- Open Access
- Published:

# The Spread of a Noise Field in a Dispersive Medium

*EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing*
**volume 2010**, Article number: 484753 (2010)

## Abstract

We discuss the production of induced noise by a pulse and the propagation of the noise in a dispersive medium. We present a simple model where the noise is the sum of pulses and where the mean of each pulse is random. We obtain explicit expressions for the standard deviation of the spatial noise as a function of time. We also formulate the problem in terms of a time-frequency phase space approach and in particular we use the Wigner distribution to define the spatial/spatial-frequency distribution.

## 1. Introduction

In many situations noise is induced by a pulse due to the scattering of the pulse from many sources. To take a specific example, consider a pulse that hits a school of fish; each fish scatters the wave and the acoustic field seen at an arbitrary point is the sum of the waves received from each fish; the sum of which is noise like. Another example is the creation of a set of bubbles by a propeller in a finite region in space. When each bubble explodes it produces a wave and the acoustic pressure seen is the sum of the waves produced by each bubble. Of course this is a simplified view since there could be many other effects such as multiple scattering. Now as time evolves the noise field is propagating and can be changing in a significant way if the medium has dispersion. Our aim here is to investigate how a noise field which is composed of a group of pulses behave as it is propagating and in particular we want to investigate the spreading of the field as a function of time. Suppose we consider a space-time signal composed of the sum of elementary signal,

where is a deterministic function and and are random parameters. We have put in an overall for normalization convenience. The production of noise by expressions like (1) are sometimes called FOM models of noise production [1–7]. Here, we consider the case where the only random variables are the means of each of the elementary signals and where all are the same. Hence we write

where are the means of the elementary signals, assuming that the mean of is zero. The approach we take is the following. At time we form an ensemble of signals

We then evolve into in a medium with dispersion giving (2) and calculate the appropriate ensemble averaged moments of

For the elementary signal we define the moments in the standard way

Now if there are random parameters as for example the means then use to signify ensemble averaging. In particular

Note that in general it is not the case that the ensemble averaging and ordinary averaging can be interchanged. Which is to be used depends on the quantity we are considering. In this paper we will assume that

As to the means we assume they are taken from a distribution and we define the ensemble mean and standard deviation by

## 2. Pulse Propagation

We briefly review some of our previous results regarding pulse propagation in a dispersive medium. We consider one mode and also assume that the dispersion relation is real, which means there is no attenuation. The solution for each mode is [8–13],

where is the initial spatial spectrum

The pulse is normalized so that

If we define

then and form Fourier transform pairs for all time and hence the spatial moments can be obtained by way of

where is the position operator in the representation

The first two moments and standard deviation are

These expressions have been explicitly obtained [14, 15] to give

where

is the group velocity and where

### 2.1. An Exactly Solvable Case

An interesting and exactly solvable example that we will use is where the dispersion relation is

and the initial pulse is taken to be

At the means and standard deviations of and are

Using (17)–(21), one obtains that

and these yield

## 3. Spread of the Wave Group

For convenience we repeat the basic equations producing the noise field

We normalize to one by considering

Now taking the ensemble average we have

and therefore we take so that

In the above we have assumed that and are independent.

Now consider the mean

The ensemble average is

giving

where is given by (7).

For the calculation of the first few steps as above lead to

which gives

The standard deviation is therefore

which, combining (33) and (35) leads to

where is given by (9). Also, noting that

one has

Further, if we use (19) we then have

## 4. The Spread in Wave Number

We now consider the spatial spectrum. For the total wave we define

and for the elementary wave we define

The standard wave number moments are defined by

Substituting into (42), we have

Or

Now consider the ensemble average of the wave number

and hence

Similarly

and further

Thus we see that the ensemble of the wave number moments are the moments of the individual pulse. This is the case because our model deals with random spatial translations only.

### 4.1. Example

For the example we described in Section 2.1 we substitute (26) into (33) and (39) to obtain

Also using (40) we have

To be concrete we now take a particular distribution for

in which case

and therefore we have

## 5. Wigner Spectrum Approach

We now show that an effective method to study these types of problems is using phase-space methods. The advantage is that one can study nonstationary noise in a direct manner. Suppose we have a random function one can think of a particular realization and substitute into the Wigner distribution and then take the ensemble average of it [16–19]

is called the Wigner spectrum and satisfies the marginal conditions

where is the Fourier transform of As standard we define the autocorrelation function by way of

and hence the Wigner spectrum can be written as

Taking the inverse

and letting and we also have that

However in this paper we are dealing with spatial noise and hence we have a spatial random function We define the spatial Wigner spectrum by

The spatial autocorrelation is defined by

and therefore

To specialize to our case we have

and we can substitute (2) into (65). However, it is more effective if we work in the Fourier domain. The Wigner spectrum can be written as

where is given by (42). Now combining (13) and (46), we have

and therefore

Substituting this into (66), we obtain

Setting we have

and taking the Fourier inverse we have that

Substituting this back into (69), we obtain

This expresses the Wigner spectrum at an arbitrary time given the spectrum at time zero.

One can further simplify by defining the Wigner distribution for each pulse as

Now consider

Now taking the ensemble average we have

and therefore we have that in general

Setting we also have

We now aim at expressing in terms of Using (72), we have that

Or

This allows for the calculation of the Wigner spectrum in a simple and direct manner. We also point out that may be considered as the characteristic function

and hence we may write (79) as

Our previous results can be obtained using this Wigner spectrum. For example, consider the first conditional moment

which evaluates to (33).

## 6. Conclusion

We emphasize that the above model assumed that the only random variable was the mean of the individual pulses. In a future paper we will consider more general cases and of particular interest is to allow the standard deviation of each pulse to be a random variable. For example instead of (2) we can write

where is inserted for normalization purposes. The combination of and allows us to make both the means and standard deviation of each pulse random variable.

We now discuss our main result, namely, (37) and (40) which we repeat here for convenience

First we point out that one can consdier the case for the ensomble as one particle having an initial mean given and an initial standard deviation

For the case of no dispersion then and therefore

For large times the dominant term is and since the coefficient of is manifestly positive we have that

Hence for large times the spread, is a linear function of time.

## References

Faure P: Theoretical model of reverberation noise.

*Journal of the Acoustical Society of America*1964, 36: 259-266. 10.1121/1.1918943Ol'shveskii VV:

*Characteristics of Sea Reverberation*. Consultants Bureau, New York, NY, USA; 1967.Middleton D: A statistical theory of reverberation and similar first-order scattered fields, part I.

*IEEE Transactions on Information Theory*1967, 13: 372-392.Middleton D: A statistical theory of reverberation and similar first-order scattered fields, part II.

*IEEE Transactions on Information Theory*1967, 13: 393-414.Middleton D: A statistical theory of reverberation and similar first-order scattered fields, part III.

*IEEE Transactions on Information Theory*1972, 18: 35-67. 10.1109/TIT.1972.1054754Middleton D: A statistical theory of reverberation and similar first-order scattered fields, part IV.

*IEEE Transactions on Information Theory*1972, 18: 68-90. 10.1109/TIT.1972.1054755Cohen L: The history of noise.

*IEEE Signal Processing Magazine*2005, 22(6):20-45.Jackson JD:

*Classical Electrodynamics*. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 1992.Lighthill J:

*Waves in Fluids*. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1978.Morse PH, Ingard KU:

*Theoretical Acoustics*. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA; 1968.Tolstoy I, Clay CS:

*Ocean Acoustics: Theory and Experiment in Underwater Sound*. Acoustical Society of America; 1966.Whitham GB:

*Linear and Nonlinear Waves*. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 1974.Graff K:

*Wave Motion in Elastic Solids*. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK; 1975.Cohen L: Why do wave packets sometimes contract?

*Journal of Modern Optics*2002, 49(14-15):2365-2382. 10.1080/0950034021000011248Cohen L, Loughlin P, Okopal G: Exact and approximate moments of a propagating pulse.

*Journal of Modern Optics*2008, 55(19-20):3349-3358. 10.1080/09500340802428280Mark WD: Spectral analysis of the convolution and filtering of non-stationary stochastic processes.

*Journal of Sound and Vibration*1970, 11(1):19-63. 10.1016/S0022-460X(70)80106-7Martin W: Time-frequency analysis of random signals.

*Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP '82), 1982, Paris, France*1325-1328.Martin W, Flandrin P: Wigner-ville spectral analysis of nonstationary processes.

*IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing*1985, 33(6):1461-1470. 10.1109/TASSP.1985.1164760Cohen L:

*Time-Frequency Analysis*. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA; 1995.

## Acknowledgment

This paper is supported by the Office of Naval Research.

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Cohen, L. The Spread of a Noise Field in a Dispersive Medium.
*EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process.* **2010**, 484753 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/484753

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/484753

### Keywords

- Ensemble Average
- Random Parameter
- Elementary Signal
- Dispersive Medium
- Spatial Spectrum