- Research Article
- Open Access

# Vector-Sensor Array Processing for Polarization Parameters and DOA Estimation

- Caroline Paulus
^{1}and - Jérôme I. Mars
^{1}Email author

**2010**:850265

https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/850265

© C. Paulus and J. I. Mars. 2010

**Received:**13 July 2009**Accepted:**2 May 2010**Published:**31 May 2010

## Abstract

This paper presents a method allowing a complete characterization of wave signals received on a vector-sensor array. The proposed technique is based on wavefields separation processing and on estimation of fundamental waves attributes as the state of polarization state and the direction of arrival. Estimation of these attributes is an important step in data processing for a wide range of applications where vector sensor antennas technology is involved such as seismic processing, electromagnetic fields studies, and telecommunications. Compared to the classic techniques, the proposed method is based on computation of multicomponent wideband spectral matrices which enable to take into account all information given by the vector sensor array structures and thus provide a complete characterization of a larger number of sources.

## Keywords

- Polarization Parameter
- Signal Subspace
- Steering Vector
- Uniform Linear Array
- Noise Subspace

## 1. Introduction

Over the past decade, the use of vector-sensor array (VSA) technology for source localization has significantly increased allowing a better characterization of the recorded phenomena in a wide range of applications (e.g., acoustics, electromagnetism, radar, sonar, geophysics, etc.) [1–5]. For instance in seismic acquisition case, vector sensors are nowadays widely used, allowing a better characterization of the layers thanks to the state of polarization dimension added to detection process. With a vector sensor, we can have access to the particle-displacement vector that describes the particle motion in 3D at a given point in space. As the state of polarization is wavefield dependent, it can be used as an essential attribute to separate waves in addition to their different DOAs. To resume, multicomponent acquisitions provide more detailed information on the recorded wavefield and VSA-recorded signals allow the estimation of the directions of arrival (DOA) and the polarizations of multiple waves (or sources) impinging the array. In the case of elastic and acoustic seismic surveys, the VSA-recorded signals are a mixture of various wave types (body waves, surface waves, converted waves, multiples, noise, etc.). Combined multicomponent acquisition and multicomponent processing and analysis provide better wave characterizations and enhance the imaging resolution of geological features. In order to perform the characterization of each wave, separation of interfering wavefields is a crucial step. In the case of multicomponent sensor arrays, methods of filtering, of source localization, and of polarization estimation have already been developed for acoustics and electromagnetic sources. In the last decade, many array processing techniques for source localization and polarization estimation using vector sensors have been developed, mainly in electromagnetics. Nehorai and Paldi [1] proposed the Cramer-Rao bound and the vector cross-product DOA. Li and Compton Jr [3] developed the ESPRIT algorithm for a vector-sensor array. MUSIC-based algorithms were also proposed by Wong and Zoltowski [6–8], who also developed vector-sensors versions of ESPRIT [9–13]. These approaches represent a highly popular subspace-based parameter estimation method and use matrix techniques directly derived from scalar-sensor array processing. Such a method is based on the long-vector approach, consisting in the concatenation of all components of the vector-sensor array in a long vector [9].

The originality of our method consists in keeping multidimensional structures of data organization for processing. These structures are more adapted to the nature of seismic polarized signals, allowing data organization closer to its multimodal intrinsic structure. This paper presents a novel subspace separation method performing wavefields separation. This method issued from the Multicomponent Wideband Spectral Matrix Filtering (MWSMF) technique [14, 15] is a subspace separation algorithm derived from the classic spectral matrix filtering presented in [16, 17]. After a separation step where each wavefield has been isolated, we propose polarization and DOA estimations for each separated wavefield that takes all frequencies and all components into account. The algorithm treats the various components as a whole rather than individually. In Section 2, we summarize the noise filtering and wavefields separation principles. In Sections 3 and 4, we present the technique using the estimated multicomponent wideband spectral matrices of sources leading to the estimations of the polarization and of the DOA parameters for each wavefield. Finally in Section 5, we present the performances of the algorithm on several simulated 2C-datasets.

## 2. Noise Filtering and Wavefield Separation

In this section, the proposed subspace separation technique based on Multicomponent Wideband Spectral Matrix Filtering (MWSMF) is briefly explained (for more details, the reader might refer to [14, 15]).

### 2.1. Model Formulation and Hypothesis

where characterizes the apparent wave velocity and the distance between two adjacent sensors.

In case of multicomponent acquisition with vector sensor array, seismic data depend on three parameters: time ( samples), distance ( sensors), and number of components ( components). These components, recording signals in three directions as (for in-line axis), (for cross-line axis), and for vertical axis, allow to express the state of polarization of the different wavefields.

where and are, respectively, the amplitude ratio and the phase-shift between components and characterizing polarization parameters for a source .

- (i)
, a matrix of size whose columns are steering vectors describing the propagation of the waves along the antenna for all frequencies and all components,

- (ii)
- (iii)
, a vector of size which corresponds to the additive noises supposed to be additive, temporally and spatially white, uncorrelated with sources, nonpolarized and with identical power spectral density .

### 2.2. Estimation of the Multicomponent Wideband Spectral Matrix

with the expectation operator and the transpose conjugate operation.

To avoid the fact that is noninvertible (not full rank) and to decorrelate sources from noise and from themselves, we perform smoothing operators to estimate the matrix . This step is crucial since the effectiveness of filtering depends on this estimation. In practice, mathematical expectation operator is an averaging operation, like spatial or frequential smoothing or both of them [19–22]. Objective of these averaging operations is to reduce the influence of terms corresponding to the interactions between different sources in order to uncorrelate them, and to uncorrelate sources and noise, making the inversion of the spectral matrix possible. The spatial smoothing could be done by averaging spatial sub-bands. The uniform linear array with sensors is subdivided into overlapping subarrays in order to have several identical arrays, which will be used to estimate spectral matrices in order to build a smoothed matrix. Shan et al. [21] have proven that if the number of subarrays is greater than or equal to the number of sources Nw, then the spectral matrix of the sources is nonsingular. However, one assumption is that the wave does not vary rapidly over the number of sensors used in the average, in particular, amplitude fluctuations must be smoothed out. To introduce frequency smoothing, two ways can be performed: either by weighting the autocorrelation and cross-correlation functions (in the time domain) or by averaging frequential sub-bands (in the frequential domain). For a better estimation of the multicomponent wideband spectral matrix, it is suitable to realize jointly spatial and frequential smoothing. For more details on averaging operators, we suggest to read [14].

### 2.3. Estimation of Signal Subspace

### 2.4. Filtering by Projection onto the Signal Subspace

The final steps consist of rearranging the long-vectors and in its initial form and computing an inverse Fourier transform in order to come back to the time-distance-component domain.

## 3. Polarization Estimation

### 3.1. Introduction

After presenting the separation processing part, we propose to find polarization parameters on each separated wavefield. State of polarization analysis is based on the computation of parameters describing the particle movement associated with wave propagation. That movement of the ground induced useful parameters which were first identified by Jolly in 1956 [27], whereas the first attempt to measure this movement was done by Shimshoni and Smith in 1964 [28]. They introduced a successful method of polarization analysis for earthquake data. Many other algorithms were developed subsequently for seismic exploration applications [29–31]. One of the most effective and stable approaches in this regards is the algorithm developed by Flinn [32, 33] using the covariance matrix of the data. In the following part, we compare our proposed method (based on MWSM) with Flinn's algorithm.

### 3.2. Proposed Method

### 3.3. Comparison between Flinn's Method and Proposed Method Based on MWSM

MWSM's and Flinn's methods are two different approaches for polarization analysis. Flinn's method uses a covariance matrix and proposes a temporal approach on a single trace whereas our proposed method is a frequential approach which can either be on a single trace or on the whole array. In the case studied here, the waves' state of polarization can be considered as constant over distance. Consequently, for a given wave, we can estimate the amplitude ratio and phase shift between the components by carrying out an averaging of the parameters found on each sensor.

To compare Flinn's and our method and to illustrate polarization estimation, we consider the trivial case of a single wave with infinite velocity, received on a 2C-sensors array, whose phase shift (= 0.4 rad) and amplitude ratio (= 0.8) are constant over the array.

These figures show that for both methods, polarization analysis is very sensitive to noise and thus the estimates are better when SNR increases. We can notice that our MWSM-based method always gives better estimation than the Flinn's method for small SNR.

## 4. Direction-of-Arrival Estimation

### 4.1. Proposed Method

Just as we did for polarization state estimation, we propose a DOA estimation method based on the structure of Multicomponent Wideband Spectral Matrix. We call it MW-MUSIC for Multicomponent Wideband-MUSIC as it is an extension of the MUSIC (MUltiple SIgnal Classification) algorithm [34–37]. This method is an extension of the MUSIC algorithm for vector-sensor arrays called LV-MUSIC for Long-Vector MUSIC [1]. The first extensions of MUSIC algorithm to polarized sources were made by Schmidt [34], Ferrara and Parks [38], Wong and Zoltowski [6, 8], and Wong et al. [13]. Algorithms to estimate DOAs of polarized sources in electromagnetism were also proposed in [1, 39, 40]. Our proposed method has the advantage of being able to compute both DOA and offset.

with , being the propagation vector corresponding to the wave . Thereafter, we note , the matrix corresponding to the projection on noise subspace.

The functional allows local maxima for a set of values and . We use the fact that two parameters have been already found by the method proposed on Section 3. After this stage, the functional only depends on two parameters, the direction of arrival and the offset, and it will give maximum for values of corresponding to the sources present in the signal. It is clear that processing will work with lot of efficiency in case of far field sources (waves can be considered as locally plane).

### 4.2. Study of Estimator Variance

## 5. Synthetic Examples

*wave 1*) has a linear polarization parameter ( and ) and the slowest wave (called

*wave 2*) is characterized by an elliptic polarization ( and ).

### 5.1. Wavefield Separation

*wave 1*(low frequency content), and smaller energetic pattern to

*wave 2*(high frequency content). The MWS Matrix is then decomposed using eigenvalue decomposition. Observing the decrease of eigenvalues, we decide to keep the two first eigen sections, corresponding to modeled waves:

*wave 1*) and (

*wave 2*). We can observe from these figures that separation of waves is efficient since patterns are well separated and no energetic interferences appear. Thus, by projecting the initial data on the first eigenvector , we obtain the first extracted wavefield (

*wave 1*) (Figure 10) and on the second eigenvector , the second extracted wavefield (

*wave 2*) (Figure 11). These two figures clearly show that the noise has been removed and the waves have been well separated.

### 5.2. Polarization Estimation

After separation of waves, the second step consists of making the polarization analysis of the two waves using the matrix elements of
and
(see Section 3). As previously presented, in Figure 8 (resp., Figure 9), blocks
and
correspond to wideband spectral matrices of *wave 1* (resp., *wave 2*) on components
and
respectively. We denote them by
and
(resp.,
and
). Blocks
and
correspond to the cross-spectral matrices of *wave 1* (resp., *wave 2*) containing the interactions between components
and
We denote them by
and
(resp.,
and
).

*wave 2*by using the principal and secondary diagonals of the spectral matrix .

### 5.3. DOA Estimation

### 5.4. A More Realistic Example

## 6. Conclusion

A novel method providing wavefields separation along with an estimation of both the polarization parameters and the directions of arrival was presented. Taking into account the polarization and the widebandness of the signal leads to a better characterization of a greater number of waves ( ) as opposed to the monocomponent array case ( ). The performance and efficiency of the method was proven using several simulations. Comparison of the wideband matrix filtering method with those of the classic filtering technique has already been done [15] and gave encouraging result for wideband case. We also obtained promising results for DAO estimation using the proposed method which can be attributed to the fact that our method takes into account the entire frequency information and is therefore insensitive to frequency band selection.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank reviewers for interesting remarks and A. A. Khan for improving the language.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Nehorai A, Paldi E: Vector-sensor array processing for electromagnetic source localization.
*IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing*1994, 42(2):376-398. 10.1109/78.275610View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Nehorai A, Paldi E: Acoustic vector-sensor array processing.
*IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing*1994, 42(9):2487-2491.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Li J, Compton RT Jr.: Angle and polarization estimation using ESPRIT with a polarization sensitive array.
*IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation*1991, 39(9):1376-1383. 10.1109/8.99047View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rahamim D, Tabrikian J, Shavit R: Source localization using vector sensor array in a multipath environment.
*IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing*2004, 52(11):3096-3103. 10.1109/TSP.2004.836456View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Chen H-W, Zhao J-W: Wideband MVDR beamforming for acoustic vector sensor linear array.
*IEE Proceedings: Radar, Sonar and Navigation*2004, 151(3):158-162. 10.1049/ip-rsn:20040651Google Scholar - Wong KT, Zoltowski MD: Self-initiating MUSIC-based direction finding and polarization estimation in spatio-polarizational beamspace.
*IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation*2000, 48(8):1235-1245. 10.1109/8.884492View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wong KT, Zoltowski MD: Diversely polarized root-MUSIC for azimuth-elevation angle-of-arrival estimation.
*Proceedings of the AP-S International Symposium & URSI Radio Science Meeting, July 1996*1352-1355.Google Scholar - Wong KT, Zoltowski MD: Root-MUSIC-based azimuth-elevation angle-of-arrival estimation with uniformly spaced but arbitrarily oriented velocity hydrophones.
*IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing*1999, 47(12):3250-3260. 10.1109/78.806070View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wong KT, Zoltowski MD: Uni-vector-sensor ESPRIT for multisource azimuth, elevation, and polarization estimation.
*IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation*1997, 45(10):1467-1474. 10.1109/8.633852View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Zoltowski MD, Wong KT: Closed-form eigenstructure-based direction finding using arbitrary but identical subarrays on a sparse uniform Cartesian array grid.
*IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing*2000, 48(8):2205-2210. 10.1109/78.852001View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Zoltowski MD, Wong KT: ESPRIT-based 2-D direction finding with a sparse uniform array of electromagnetic vector sensors.
*IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing*2000, 48(8):2195-2204. 10.1109/78.852000View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wong KT, Zoltowski MD: Closed-form direction finding and polarization estimation with arbitrarily spaced electromagnetic vector-sensors at unknown locations.
*IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation*2000, 48(5):671-681. 10.1109/8.855485View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wong KT, Li L, Zoltowski MD: Root-MUSIC-based direction-finding and polarization estimation using diversely polarized possibly collocated antennas.
*IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters*2004, 3(1):129-132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Paulus C, Mars J, Gounon P: Wideband spectral matrix filtering for multicomponent sensors array.
*Signal Processing*2005, 85(9):1723-1743. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2005.03.018View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Paulus C, Mars JI: New multicomponent filters for geophysical data processing.
*IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing*2006, 44(8):2260-2270.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Mermoz H: Imagerie, corrélation et modèles.
*Annales des Telecommunications*1976, 31(1-2):17-36.Google Scholar - Samson JC: The spectral matrix, eigenvalues, and principal components in the analysis of multichannel geophysical data.
*Annales Geophysicae*1983, 1(2):115-119.Google Scholar - Robinson EA: Predictive decomposition of time series with application to seismic exploration.
*Geophysics*1967, 32: 418-484. 10.1190/1.1439873View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rao BD, Hari KVS: Weighted subspace methods and spatial smoothing. Analysis and comparison.
*IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing*1993, 41(2):788-803. 10.1109/78.193218View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Reddi SS: On a spatial smoothing technique for multiple source location.
*IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing*1987, 35(5):709. 10.1109/TASSP.1987.1165190View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Shan T, Wax M, Kailath T: On spatial smoothing for direction-of-arrival estimation of coherent signals.
*IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing*1985, 33(4):806-811. 10.1109/TASSP.1985.1164649View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Pillai SU, Kwon BH: Forward/backward spatial smoothing techniques for coherent signal identification.
*IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing*1989, 37(1):8-15. 10.1109/29.17496View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Wang H, Kaveh M: Coherent signal-subspace processing for the detection and estimation of angles of arrival of multiple wide-band sources.
*IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing*1985, 33(4):823-831. 10.1109/TASSP.1985.1164667View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Thirion N, Mars JI, Lacoume J-L: Analytical links between steering vectors and eigenvectors.
*Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO '96), 1996, Trieste, Italy*81-84.Google Scholar - Thirion N, Lacoume J, Mars J: Resolving power of spectral matrix filtering: a discussion on the links steering vectors /eigenvectors.
*Proceedings of the 8th IEEE Signal Processing Workshop on Statistical Signal and Array Processing (SSAP '96), June 1996*340-343.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Thirion N, Mars JI, Boelle J-L: Separation of seismic signals: a new concept based on blind algorithm.
*Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO '96), 1996, Trieste, Italy*85-88.Google Scholar - Jolly RN: Investigation of shear waves.
*Geophysics*1956, 21(4):905-938. 10.1190/1.1438310View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Shimshoni M, Smith SW:Linear end parabolic
-p revisited.
*Geophysics*1964, 29(5):664-671. 10.1190/1.1439402View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Greenhalgh SA, Mason IM, Mosher CC, Lucas E: Seismic wavefield separation by multicomponent tau-p polarisation filtering.
*Tectonophysics*1990, 173(1-4):53-61. 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90203-KView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Shieh C-S, Herrmann RB: Ground roll: rejection using polarization filters.
*Geophysics*1990, 55(9):1216-1222. 10.1190/1.1442937View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Jackson GM, Mason IM, Greenhalgh SA: Principal component transforms of triaxial recordings by singular value decomposition.
*Geophysics*1991, 56(4):528-533. 10.1190/1.1443068View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Flinn EA: Signal analysis using rectilinearity and direction of particule motion.
*Proceedings of the IEEE*1965, 56: 1874-1876.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Archambeau CB, Flinn EA: Automated analysis of seismic radiation for source characteristics.
*Proceedings of the IEEE*1965, 53: 1876-1884.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Schmidt RO:
*A signal subspace approach to multiple emitter location and spectral estimation, Ph.D. dissertation*. Stanford University, Stanford, Calif, USA; 1981.Google Scholar - Schmidt RO: Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation.
*IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation*1986, 34(3):276-280. 10.1109/TAP.1986.1143830View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Kaveh M, Barabell AJ: The statistical performance of the MUSIC and the minimum-norm algorithms in resolving plane waves in noise.
*IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing*1986, 34(2):331-341. 10.1109/TASSP.1986.1164815View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Stoica P, Nehorai A: MUSIC, maximum likelihood, and Cramer-Rao bound.
*IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing*1989, 37(5):720-741. 10.1109/29.17564MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Ferrara ER Jr., Parks TM: Direction finding with an array of antennas having diverse polarizations.
*IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation*1983, 31(2):231-236. 10.1109/TAP.1983.1143038View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Hua Y: Pencil-MUSIC algorithm for finding two-dimensional angles and polarizations using crossed dipoles.
*IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation*1993, 41(3):370-376. 10.1109/8.233122View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Swindlehurst A, Viberg M: Subspace fitting with diversely polarized antenna arrays.
*IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation*1993, 41(12):1687-1694. 10.1109/8.273313View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Paulus C, Mars JI: Polarization analysis on seismic data after multicomponent wavefield filtering.
*Proceedings of EAGE/SEG Research Workshop, Multicomponent Seismic—Past, Present and Future, September 2005, Pau, France*Google Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.