 Research Article
 Open Access
VectorSensor Array Processing for Polarization Parameters and DOA Estimation
 Caroline Paulus^{1} and
 Jérôme I. Mars^{1}Email author
https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/850265
© C. Paulus and J. I. Mars. 2010
 Received: 13 July 2009
 Accepted: 2 May 2010
 Published: 31 May 2010
Abstract
This paper presents a method allowing a complete characterization of wave signals received on a vectorsensor array. The proposed technique is based on wavefields separation processing and on estimation of fundamental waves attributes as the state of polarization state and the direction of arrival. Estimation of these attributes is an important step in data processing for a wide range of applications where vector sensor antennas technology is involved such as seismic processing, electromagnetic fields studies, and telecommunications. Compared to the classic techniques, the proposed method is based on computation of multicomponent wideband spectral matrices which enable to take into account all information given by the vector sensor array structures and thus provide a complete characterization of a larger number of sources.
Keywords
 Polarization Parameter
 Signal Subspace
 Steering Vector
 Uniform Linear Array
 Noise Subspace
1. Introduction
Over the past decade, the use of vectorsensor array (VSA) technology for source localization has significantly increased allowing a better characterization of the recorded phenomena in a wide range of applications (e.g., acoustics, electromagnetism, radar, sonar, geophysics, etc.) [1–5]. For instance in seismic acquisition case, vector sensors are nowadays widely used, allowing a better characterization of the layers thanks to the state of polarization dimension added to detection process. With a vector sensor, we can have access to the particledisplacement vector that describes the particle motion in 3D at a given point in space. As the state of polarization is wavefield dependent, it can be used as an essential attribute to separate waves in addition to their different DOAs. To resume, multicomponent acquisitions provide more detailed information on the recorded wavefield and VSArecorded signals allow the estimation of the directions of arrival (DOA) and the polarizations of multiple waves (or sources) impinging the array. In the case of elastic and acoustic seismic surveys, the VSArecorded signals are a mixture of various wave types (body waves, surface waves, converted waves, multiples, noise, etc.). Combined multicomponent acquisition and multicomponent processing and analysis provide better wave characterizations and enhance the imaging resolution of geological features. In order to perform the characterization of each wave, separation of interfering wavefields is a crucial step. In the case of multicomponent sensor arrays, methods of filtering, of source localization, and of polarization estimation have already been developed for acoustics and electromagnetic sources. In the last decade, many array processing techniques for source localization and polarization estimation using vector sensors have been developed, mainly in electromagnetics. Nehorai and Paldi [1] proposed the CramerRao bound and the vector crossproduct DOA. Li and Compton Jr [3] developed the ESPRIT algorithm for a vectorsensor array. MUSICbased algorithms were also proposed by Wong and Zoltowski [6–8], who also developed vectorsensors versions of ESPRIT [9–13]. These approaches represent a highly popular subspacebased parameter estimation method and use matrix techniques directly derived from scalarsensor array processing. Such a method is based on the longvector approach, consisting in the concatenation of all components of the vectorsensor array in a long vector [9].
The originality of our method consists in keeping multidimensional structures of data organization for processing. These structures are more adapted to the nature of seismic polarized signals, allowing data organization closer to its multimodal intrinsic structure. This paper presents a novel subspace separation method performing wavefields separation. This method issued from the Multicomponent Wideband Spectral Matrix Filtering (MWSMF) technique [14, 15] is a subspace separation algorithm derived from the classic spectral matrix filtering presented in [16, 17]. After a separation step where each wavefield has been isolated, we propose polarization and DOA estimations for each separated wavefield that takes all frequencies and all components into account. The algorithm treats the various components as a whole rather than individually. In Section 2, we summarize the noise filtering and wavefields separation principles. In Sections 3 and 4, we present the technique using the estimated multicomponent wideband spectral matrices of sources leading to the estimations of the polarization and of the DOA parameters for each wavefield. Finally in Section 5, we present the performances of the algorithm on several simulated 2Cdatasets.
2. Noise Filtering and Wavefield Separation
In this section, the proposed subspace separation technique based on Multicomponent Wideband Spectral Matrix Filtering (MWSMF) is briefly explained (for more details, the reader might refer to [14, 15]).
2.1. Model Formulation and Hypothesis
 (i)
, the waveform signal emitted by a source (or a wavefied ),
 (ii)
, a random amplitude of the source ,
 (iii)
, a time propagation between source and sensor depending of (the directionofarrival (DOA) of source ),
 (iv)
, a random noise supposed to be additive, temporally and spatially white, uncorrelated with the sources, nonpolarized and with a power spectral density given by .
where characterizes the apparent wave velocity and the distance between two adjacent sensors.
 (i)
, a vector of size describing signals recorded on array at frequency bin stands transposition operator),
 (ii)
, a matrix of size whose columns are steering vectors describing the propagation of each wave with and ,
 (iii)
, a vector of size which contains the random amplitudes of the waves,
 (iv)
is a vector of size which corresponds to the additive noise.
In case of multicomponent acquisition with vector sensor array, seismic data depend on three parameters: time ( samples), distance ( sensors), and number of components ( components). These components, recording signals in three directions as (for inline axis), (for crossline axis), and for vertical axis, allow to express the state of polarization of the different wavefields.
where and are, respectively, the amplitude ratio and the phaseshift between components and characterizing polarization parameters for a source .
 (i)
, a matrix of size whose columns are steering vectors describing the propagation of the waves along the antenna for all frequencies and all components,
 (ii)
, a vector of size which contains the random amplitudes of the waves,
 (iii)
, a vector of size which corresponds to the additive noises supposed to be additive, temporally and spatially white, uncorrelated with sources, nonpolarized and with identical power spectral density .
2.2. Estimation of the Multicomponent Wideband Spectral Matrix
with the expectation operator and the transpose conjugate operation.
To avoid the fact that is noninvertible (not full rank) and to decorrelate sources from noise and from themselves, we perform smoothing operators to estimate the matrix . This step is crucial since the effectiveness of filtering depends on this estimation. In practice, mathematical expectation operator is an averaging operation, like spatial or frequential smoothing or both of them [19–22]. Objective of these averaging operations is to reduce the influence of terms corresponding to the interactions between different sources in order to uncorrelate them, and to uncorrelate sources and noise, making the inversion of the spectral matrix possible. The spatial smoothing could be done by averaging spatial subbands. The uniform linear array with sensors is subdivided into overlapping subarrays in order to have several identical arrays, which will be used to estimate spectral matrices in order to build a smoothed matrix. Shan et al. [21] have proven that if the number of subarrays is greater than or equal to the number of sources Nw, then the spectral matrix of the sources is nonsingular. However, one assumption is that the wave does not vary rapidly over the number of sensors used in the average, in particular, amplitude fluctuations must be smoothed out. To introduce frequency smoothing, two ways can be performed: either by weighting the autocorrelation and crosscorrelation functions (in the time domain) or by averaging frequential subbands (in the frequential domain). For a better estimation of the multicomponent wideband spectral matrix, it is suitable to realize jointly spatial and frequential smoothing. For more details on averaging operators, we suggest to read [14].
2.3. Estimation of Signal Subspace
2.4. Filtering by Projection onto the Signal Subspace
The final steps consist of rearranging the longvectors and in its initial form and computing an inverse Fourier transform in order to come back to the timedistancecomponent domain.
3. Polarization Estimation
3.1. Introduction
After presenting the separation processing part, we propose to find polarization parameters on each separated wavefield. State of polarization analysis is based on the computation of parameters describing the particle movement associated with wave propagation. That movement of the ground induced useful parameters which were first identified by Jolly in 1956 [27], whereas the first attempt to measure this movement was done by Shimshoni and Smith in 1964 [28]. They introduced a successful method of polarization analysis for earthquake data. Many other algorithms were developed subsequently for seismic exploration applications [29–31]. One of the most effective and stable approaches in this regards is the algorithm developed by Flinn [32, 33] using the covariance matrix of the data. In the following part, we compare our proposed method (based on MWSM) with Flinn's algorithm.
3.2. Proposed Method
with being the cardinal of .
3.3. Comparison between Flinn's Method and Proposed Method Based on MWSM
MWSM's and Flinn's methods are two different approaches for polarization analysis. Flinn's method uses a covariance matrix and proposes a temporal approach on a single trace whereas our proposed method is a frequential approach which can either be on a single trace or on the whole array. In the case studied here, the waves' state of polarization can be considered as constant over distance. Consequently, for a given wave, we can estimate the amplitude ratio and phase shift between the components by carrying out an averaging of the parameters found on each sensor.
To compare Flinn's and our method and to illustrate polarization estimation, we consider the trivial case of a single wave with infinite velocity, received on a 2Csensors array, whose phase shift (= 0.4 rad) and amplitude ratio (= 0.8) are constant over the array.
These figures show that for both methods, polarization analysis is very sensitive to noise and thus the estimates are better when SNR increases. We can notice that our MWSMbased method always gives better estimation than the Flinn's method for small SNR.
4. DirectionofArrival Estimation
4.1. Proposed Method
Just as we did for polarization state estimation, we propose a DOA estimation method based on the structure of Multicomponent Wideband Spectral Matrix. We call it MWMUSIC for Multicomponent WidebandMUSIC as it is an extension of the MUSIC (MUltiple SIgnal Classification) algorithm [34–37]. This method is an extension of the MUSIC algorithm for vectorsensor arrays called LVMUSIC for LongVector MUSIC [1]. The first extensions of MUSIC algorithm to polarized sources were made by Schmidt [34], Ferrara and Parks [38], Wong and Zoltowski [6, 8], and Wong et al. [13]. Algorithms to estimate DOAs of polarized sources in electromagnetism were also proposed in [1, 39, 40]. Our proposed method has the advantage of being able to compute both DOA and offset.
with , being the propagation vector corresponding to the wave . Thereafter, we note , the matrix corresponding to the projection on noise subspace.
The functional allows local maxima for a set of values and . We use the fact that two parameters have been already found by the method proposed on Section 3. After this stage, the functional only depends on two parameters, the direction of arrival and the offset, and it will give maximum for values of corresponding to the sources present in the signal. It is clear that processing will work with lot of efficiency in case of far field sources (waves can be considered as locally plane).
4.2. Study of Estimator Variance
5. Synthetic Examples
5.1. Wavefield Separation
5.2. Polarization Estimation
After separation of waves, the second step consists of making the polarization analysis of the two waves using the matrix elements of and (see Section 3). As previously presented, in Figure 8 (resp., Figure 9), blocks and correspond to wideband spectral matrices of wave 1 (resp., wave 2) on components and respectively. We denote them by and (resp., and ). Blocks and correspond to the crossspectral matrices of wave 1 (resp., wave 2) containing the interactions between components and We denote them by and (resp., and ).
True and estimated values of polarization parameters of wave 1 and wave 2.
True values  Estimated values  

wave 1 


rad  rad  
wave 2 


rad  rad 
5.3. DOA Estimation
Estimation of DOAs and offsets.
DOA (pts.)  Offset (pts.)  

True Values  Estimated Values  True Values  Estimated Values  
wave 1 




wave 2 




5.4. A More Realistic Example
6. Conclusion
A novel method providing wavefields separation along with an estimation of both the polarization parameters and the directions of arrival was presented. Taking into account the polarization and the widebandness of the signal leads to a better characterization of a greater number of waves ( ) as opposed to the monocomponent array case ( ). The performance and efficiency of the method was proven using several simulations. Comparison of the wideband matrix filtering method with those of the classic filtering technique has already been done [15] and gave encouraging result for wideband case. We also obtained promising results for DAO estimation using the proposed method which can be attributed to the fact that our method takes into account the entire frequency information and is therefore insensitive to frequency band selection.
Declarations
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank reviewers for interesting remarks and A. A. Khan for improving the language.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Nehorai A, Paldi E: Vectorsensor array processing for electromagnetic source localization. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1994, 42(2):376398. 10.1109/78.275610View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Nehorai A, Paldi E: Acoustic vectorsensor array processing. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1994, 42(9):24872491.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Li J, Compton RT Jr.: Angle and polarization estimation using ESPRIT with a polarization sensitive array. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 1991, 39(9):13761383. 10.1109/8.99047View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Rahamim D, Tabrikian J, Shavit R: Source localization using vector sensor array in a multipath environment. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2004, 52(11):30963103. 10.1109/TSP.2004.836456View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Chen HW, Zhao JW: Wideband MVDR beamforming for acoustic vector sensor linear array. IEE Proceedings: Radar, Sonar and Navigation 2004, 151(3):158162. 10.1049/iprsn:20040651Google Scholar
 Wong KT, Zoltowski MD: Selfinitiating MUSICbased direction finding and polarization estimation in spatiopolarizational beamspace. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 2000, 48(8):12351245. 10.1109/8.884492View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Wong KT, Zoltowski MD: Diversely polarized rootMUSIC for azimuthelevation angleofarrival estimation. Proceedings of the APS International Symposium & URSI Radio Science Meeting, July 1996 13521355.Google Scholar
 Wong KT, Zoltowski MD: RootMUSICbased azimuthelevation angleofarrival estimation with uniformly spaced but arbitrarily oriented velocity hydrophones. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1999, 47(12):32503260. 10.1109/78.806070View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Wong KT, Zoltowski MD: Univectorsensor ESPRIT for multisource azimuth, elevation, and polarization estimation. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 1997, 45(10):14671474. 10.1109/8.633852View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Zoltowski MD, Wong KT: Closedform eigenstructurebased direction finding using arbitrary but identical subarrays on a sparse uniform Cartesian array grid. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2000, 48(8):22052210. 10.1109/78.852001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Zoltowski MD, Wong KT: ESPRITbased 2D direction finding with a sparse uniform array of electromagnetic vector sensors. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2000, 48(8):21952204. 10.1109/78.852000View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Wong KT, Zoltowski MD: Closedform direction finding and polarization estimation with arbitrarily spaced electromagnetic vectorsensors at unknown locations. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 2000, 48(5):671681. 10.1109/8.855485View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Wong KT, Li L, Zoltowski MD: RootMUSICbased directionfinding and polarization estimation using diversely polarized possibly collocated antennas. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 2004, 3(1):129132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Paulus C, Mars J, Gounon P: Wideband spectral matrix filtering for multicomponent sensors array. Signal Processing 2005, 85(9):17231743. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2005.03.018View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Paulus C, Mars JI: New multicomponent filters for geophysical data processing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2006, 44(8):22602270.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Mermoz H: Imagerie, corrélation et modèles. Annales des Telecommunications 1976, 31(12):1736.Google Scholar
 Samson JC: The spectral matrix, eigenvalues, and principal components in the analysis of multichannel geophysical data. Annales Geophysicae 1983, 1(2):115119.Google Scholar
 Robinson EA: Predictive decomposition of time series with application to seismic exploration. Geophysics 1967, 32: 418484. 10.1190/1.1439873View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Rao BD, Hari KVS: Weighted subspace methods and spatial smoothing. Analysis and comparison. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1993, 41(2):788803. 10.1109/78.193218View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Reddi SS: On a spatial smoothing technique for multiple source location. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1987, 35(5):709. 10.1109/TASSP.1987.1165190View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Shan T, Wax M, Kailath T: On spatial smoothing for directionofarrival estimation of coherent signals. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1985, 33(4):806811. 10.1109/TASSP.1985.1164649View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Pillai SU, Kwon BH: Forward/backward spatial smoothing techniques for coherent signal identification. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1989, 37(1):815. 10.1109/29.17496View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Wang H, Kaveh M: Coherent signalsubspace processing for the detection and estimation of angles of arrival of multiple wideband sources. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1985, 33(4):823831. 10.1109/TASSP.1985.1164667View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Thirion N, Mars JI, Lacoume JL: Analytical links between steering vectors and eigenvectors. Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO '96), 1996, Trieste, Italy 8184.Google Scholar
 Thirion N, Lacoume J, Mars J: Resolving power of spectral matrix filtering: a discussion on the links steering vectors /eigenvectors. Proceedings of the 8th IEEE Signal Processing Workshop on Statistical Signal and Array Processing (SSAP '96), June 1996 340343.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Thirion N, Mars JI, Boelle JL: Separation of seismic signals: a new concept based on blind algorithm. Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO '96), 1996, Trieste, Italy 8588.Google Scholar
 Jolly RN: Investigation of shear waves. Geophysics 1956, 21(4):905938. 10.1190/1.1438310View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Shimshoni M, Smith SW:Linear end parabolic p revisited. Geophysics 1964, 29(5):664671. 10.1190/1.1439402View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Greenhalgh SA, Mason IM, Mosher CC, Lucas E: Seismic wavefield separation by multicomponent taup polarisation filtering. Tectonophysics 1990, 173(14):5361. 10.1016/00401951(90)90203KView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Shieh CS, Herrmann RB: Ground roll: rejection using polarization filters. Geophysics 1990, 55(9):12161222. 10.1190/1.1442937View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Jackson GM, Mason IM, Greenhalgh SA: Principal component transforms of triaxial recordings by singular value decomposition. Geophysics 1991, 56(4):528533. 10.1190/1.1443068View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Flinn EA: Signal analysis using rectilinearity and direction of particule motion. Proceedings of the IEEE 1965, 56: 18741876.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Archambeau CB, Flinn EA: Automated analysis of seismic radiation for source characteristics. Proceedings of the IEEE 1965, 53: 18761884.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Schmidt RO: A signal subspace approach to multiple emitter location and spectral estimation, Ph.D. dissertation. Stanford University, Stanford, Calif, USA; 1981.Google Scholar
 Schmidt RO: Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 1986, 34(3):276280. 10.1109/TAP.1986.1143830View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Kaveh M, Barabell AJ: The statistical performance of the MUSIC and the minimumnorm algorithms in resolving plane waves in noise. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1986, 34(2):331341. 10.1109/TASSP.1986.1164815View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Stoica P, Nehorai A: MUSIC, maximum likelihood, and CramerRao bound. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1989, 37(5):720741. 10.1109/29.17564MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Ferrara ER Jr., Parks TM: Direction finding with an array of antennas having diverse polarizations. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 1983, 31(2):231236. 10.1109/TAP.1983.1143038View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Hua Y: PencilMUSIC algorithm for finding twodimensional angles and polarizations using crossed dipoles. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 1993, 41(3):370376. 10.1109/8.233122View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Swindlehurst A, Viberg M: Subspace fitting with diversely polarized antenna arrays. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 1993, 41(12):16871694. 10.1109/8.273313View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Paulus C, Mars JI: Polarization analysis on seismic data after multicomponent wavefield filtering. Proceedings of EAGE/SEG Research Workshop, Multicomponent Seismic—Past, Present and Future, September 2005, Pau, FranceGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.