Skip to main content


We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research Article
  • Open Access

Fast Registration of Remotely Sensed Images for Earthquake Damage Estimation

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing20062006:076462

  • Received: 13 February 2005
  • Accepted: 26 September 2005
  • Published:


Analysis of the multispectral remotely sensed images of the areas destroyed by an earthquake is proved to be a helpful tool for destruction assessments. The performance of such methods is highly dependant on the preprocess that registers the two shots before and after an event. In this paper, we propose a new fast and reliable change detection method for remotely sensed images and analyze its performance. The experimental results show the efficiency of the proposed algorithm.


  • Information Technology
  • Detection Method
  • Quantum Information
  • Change Detection
  • Helpful Tool

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Mathematical Science, Sharif University of Technology, P.O. Box 11365-9415, Tehran, Iran
Department of Computer Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, P.O. Box 11365-9517, Tehran, Iran


  1. Wiemker R, Speck A, Kulbach D, Spitzer H, Bienlein J: Unsupervised robust change detection on multispectral imagery using spectral and spatial features. Proceedings of the 3rd International Airborne Remote Sensing Conference and Exhibition, July 1997, Copenhagen, Denmark 1: 640–647.Google Scholar
  2. Fischer CS, Levien LM: Monitoring California's hardwood rangelands using remotely sensed data. Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Oak Woodlands, October 2001, San Diego, Calif, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergen KM, Brown DG, Rutherford JR, Gustafson EJ: Development of a method for remote sensing of land-cover change 1980–2000 in the USFS North Central Region using heterogeneous USGS LUDA and NOAA AVHRR 1 km data. Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS '02), June 2002, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 2: 1210–1212.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Matsuoka M, Yamazaki F: Application of the damage detection method using SAR intensity images to recent earthquakes. Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS '02), June 2002, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 4: 2042–2044.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Andre G, Chiroiu L, Mering C, Chopin F: Building destruction and damage assessment after earthquake using high resolution optical sensors. The case of the Gujarat earthquake of January 26, 2001. Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS '03), July 2003, Toulouse, France 4: 2398–2400.Google Scholar
  6. Nakamura M, Sakamoto M, Kakumoto S, Kosugi Y: Stabilizing the accuracy of change detection from geographic images by multi-leveled exploration and selective smoothing. Proceedings of the Global Conference and Exhibition on Geospatial Technology, Tools and Solutions (GIS '03), March 2003, Vancouver, BC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown LG: A survey of image registration techniques. ACM Computing Surveys 1992, 24(4):325–376. 10.1145/146370.146374View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Townshend JRG, Justice CO, Gurney C, McManus J: The impact of misregistration on change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1992, 30(5):1054–1060. 10.1109/36.175340View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Zitova B, Flusser J: Image registration methods: a survey. Image and Vision Computing 2003, 21(11):977–1000. 10.1016/S0262-8856(03)00137-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Robinson D, Milanfar P: Fundamental performance limits in image registration. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '03), September 2003, Barcelona, Spain 3: 323–326.Google Scholar
  11. Li H, Manjunath BS, Mitra SK: A contour-based approach to multisensor image registration. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 1995, 4(3):320–334. 10.1109/83.366480View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Xia M, Liu B: Image registration by "Super-curves". IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2004, 13(5):720–732. 10.1109/TIP.2003.822611MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Helm M: Towards automatic rectification of satellite images using feature based matching. Proceedings of International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS '91), June 1991, Espoo, Finland 4: 2439–2442.Google Scholar
  14. Goshtasby A, Stockman GC: Point pattern matching using convex hull edges. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1985, 15(5):631–637.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Hsieh YC, McKeown DM, Perlant FP: Performance evaluation of scene registration and stereo matching for cartographic feature extraction. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1992, 14(2):214–238. 10.1109/34.121790View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Roux M: Automatic registration of SPOT images and digitized maps. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '96), September 1996, Lausanne, Switzerland 2: 625–628.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Li SZ, Kittler J, Petrou M: Matching and recognition of road networks from aerial images. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV '92), May 1992, Santa Margherita Ligure, Italy 857–861.Google Scholar
  18. Sester M, Hild H, Fritsch D: Definition of ground-control features for image registration using GIS-data. Proceedings of the Symposium on Object Recognition and Scene Classification from Multispectral and Multisensor Pixels CD-ROM, 1998, Columbus, Ohio, USA 32/3: 537–543.Google Scholar
  19. Maître H, Wu Y: Improving dynamic programming to solve image registration. Pattern Recognition 1987, 20(4):443–462. 10.1016/0031-3203(87)90071-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Neemuchwala H, Hero A, Carson P: Image registration using alpha-entropy measures and entropic graphs. European Journal on Signal Processing 2004. Special issue on content-based visual information retrieval, Scholar
  21. Chatterjee C, Roychowdhury VP: Algorithms for coplanar camera calibration. Machine Vision and Applications 2000, 12(2):84–97. 10.1007/s001380050127View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Abdel-Aziz Y, Karara H: Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into object space coordinates in close range photogrammetry. Proceedings of the ASP/UI Symposium on Close-Range Photogrammetry, January 1971, Urbana, Ill, USA 1–18.Google Scholar
  23. Abadpour A, Kasaei S: Fast registration of remotely sensed images. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Computer Society of Iran Computer Conference (CSICC '05), February 2005, Tehran, Iran 61–67.Google Scholar
  24. Amiri SM, Kasaei S: An ultra fast method to approximate affine transform using control points. submitted to IEEE Signal Processing LettersGoogle Scholar
  25. Swain MJ, Ballard DH: Color indexing. International Journal of Computer Vision 1991, 7(1):11–32. 10.1007/BF00130487View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee HY, Lee HK, Ha YH: Spatial color descriptor for image retrieval and video segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 2003, 5(3):358–367. 10.1109/TMM.2003.814792MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Androutsos D, Plataniotis K, Venetanopulos A: Efficient indexing and retrieval of color image data using a vector-based approach, Ph.D. dissertation. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canda; 1999.Google Scholar
  28. Shin MC, Chang KI, Tsap LV: Does colorspace transformation make any difference on skin detection? Proceedings of the 6th IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV '02), December 2002, Orlando, Fla, USA 275–279.Google Scholar
  29. Abadpour A, Kasaei S: A new parametric linear adaptive color space and its PCA-based implementation. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Computer Society of Iran Computer Conference (CSICC '04), February 2004, Tehran, Iran 2: 125–132.Google Scholar
  30. Abadpour A, Kasaei S: Performance analysis of three homogeneity criteria for color image processing. Proceedings of IPM Workshop on Computer Vision, April 2004, Tehran, IranGoogle Scholar
  31. Du Y, Chang C-I, Thouin PD: Unsupervised approach to color video thresholding. Optical Engineering 2004, 43(2):282–289. 10.1117/1.1637364View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Patras I, Hendriks EA, Lagendijk RL: Semi-automatic object-based video segmentation with labeling of color segments. Signal Processing: Image Communication 2003, 18(1):51–65. 10.1016/S0923-5965(02)00092-9Google Scholar
  33. Abadpour A, Kasaei S: A new FPCA-based fast segmentation method for color images. Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT '04), December 2004, Rome, Italy 72–75.Google Scholar
  34. Nikolaev DP, Nikolayev PP: Linear color segmentation and its implementation. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 2004, 94(1–3):115–139.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Abadpour et al. 2006