 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
Moving Target Indication via ThreeAntenna SAR with Simplified Fractional Fourier Transform
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing volume 2011, Article number: 117 (2011)
Abstract
Ground moving target indiction (GMTI) is of great important for surveillance and reconnaissance, but it is not an easy job. One technique is the alongtrack interferometry (ATI) synthetic aperture radar (SAR), which was initially proposed for estimating the radial velocity of ground moving targets. However, the measured differential phase may be contaminated by overlapping stationary clutter, leading to errors in velocity and position estimates. As effective clutter suppression can be achieved by multiple aperture or phase center antennas, this article presents a simplified fractional Fourier transform (SFrFT) for threeantennabased SAR GMTI applications. This approach cancels clutter with threeantennabased methods and forms twochannel signals through which moving targets are detected and imaged. Next, the Doppler parameters of the moving targets are estimated with the SFrFTbased estimation algorithm. In this way, both target location and target velocity are acquired. Next, the moving targets are focused with one uniform imaging algorithm. The feasibility is validated by theory analysis and simulation results.
1 Introduction
Ground moving target indication (GMTI) is of great interest for surveillance and reconnaissance [1–4], but it is not an easy job because separating the moving targets' returns from stationary clutter is a technical challenge [5]. Moving target indication is twofold [6]: one is the detection of moving targets within severe ground clutter, and the other is the estimation of their parameters such as velocity and location. As such, radar clutter has received much recognition in recent years. Several clutter suppression approaches have been proposed [7], but they often require high pulsed repeated frequency (PRF), which is not desirable to avoid excessive data rate and PRF ambiguity problem.
It is well known that the moving target with a slant range velocity will generate a differential phase shift. This phase may be detected by interferometric combination of the signals from a twochannel alongtrack interferometry (ATI) synthetic aperture radar (SAR) system. The ATI SAR was initially proposed for detecting ground moving targets [8–10], which uses two antennas to detect targets by providing essentially two identical views of the illuminated scene but at slightly different time. Several interferometry SAR (InSAR)based moving targets detection algorithms have been proposed previously [11–14]. However, the stationary clutter unavoidably corrupts the interferometric phase of the targets depending on its signaltoclutter environment. Consequently, the imaged moving targets will be displaced in azimuth according to its radial velocity.
There have been several studies on the clutter effects on the intended signals [15, 16]. But there remains still many unresolved problems, e.g., how to reliably estimate the target's true interferometric phase from the clutter. Moreover, in a nonhomogeneous terrain, the degree of physical overlap of the target with a bright stationary point clutter may also influence the estimation accuracy. In order to accurately estimate the target's true velocity, clutter contamination on the signal must be minimized. Precise knowledge of the interferogram's phase and amplitude statistics is very important for distinguishing the moving targets from the clutter. A straightforward approach to clutter cancelation is the displaced phase center antenna (DPCA) technique [17]. For one twoantenna DPCA system, the additional freedom provided by the second antenna can be used to cancel the clutter; however, it can no longer be used to estimate the moving targets' position information.
Moreover, estimating the moving targets' Doppler parameters is often required, but the WignerVill distributionbased algorithms will generate crossterms [18], particularly in the presence of multiple moving targets. In this case, the fractional Fourier transform (FrFT) is a powerful tool. But the conventional FrFT is redundant for moving targets detection [19]. This article presents a simplified FrFT (SFrFT) and threeantenna SAR combined GMTI approach. After canceling the stationary clutter using threeantenna ATI SAR, twochannel signals through which moving targets can be detected are formed. Next, one SFrFTbased algorithm is presented to estimate the Doppler parameters of the moving targets. Finally, the moving targets are located through twochannel interferometric processing algorithm. The remaining sections are organized as follows. Section II introduces the SFrFT and its mathematical properties. Section III describes the system scheme of DPCAbased threeantenna ATI SAR for GMTI applications. Next, the SFrFTbased detection algorithm is detailed in Section IV, followed by decorrelation discussion in Section V. Finally, Section VI concludes the whole paper.
2 Simplified Fractional Fourier Transform (FrFT)
The FrFT is a generalization of regular Fourier transform in that the Fourier transform transforms a signal from timedomain to frequencydomain, the FrFT transforms it into a fractional Fourier domain, which is a hybridized timefrequency domain. The transform kernel of the conventional FrFT is defined as [20]
where n denotes an integer, and α indicates the rotation angle in FrFT domain. This operation can be considered as a generalized form of Fourier transform that corresponds to a rotation over an arbitrary angle α = aπ/2 with $a\in \Re $, as shown in Figure 1. The forward and inverse FrFT of x(t) are defined, respectively, by
Given that F is the Fourier transform operator and ${F}_{r}^{\alpha}$ is the fractional Fourier transform operator, then the FrFT possesses the following important properties.

1)
Zero rotation: ${F}_{r}^{0}=I$ rotation: ${F}_{r}^{2\pi}=I$.

2)
Consistency with Fourier transform: ${F}_{r}^{\pi \u22152}=F$.

3)
Additivity of rotations: ${F}_{r}^{\beta}\cdot {F}_{r}^{\alpha}={F}_{r}^{\beta +\alpha}$.

4)
Linearity: ${F}_{r}^{\alpha}\left[{c}_{1}f\left(t\right)+{c}_{2}g\left(t\right)\right]={c}_{1}{F}_{r}^{\alpha}\left(f\left(t\right)\right)+{c}_{2}{F}_{r}^{\alpha}\left(g\left(t\right)\right)$.
Additional properties can be found in the Ref. [20]. The domains 0 < α < π/2 are called as the fractional Fourier domains. The FrFT of a function x(t), with an angle α, can be computed as the following steps.
Step 1. A product by a chirp:
Step 2. A Fourier transform (with its argument scaled by csc(α)) or a convolution:
where ⊛ denotes a convolution operator.
Step 3. Another product by a chirp:
Step 4. A product by a complex amplitude factor:
As the Steps 3 and 4 are redundant for signal detection, we name the FrFT without the Steps 3 and 4 as simplified FrFT (SFrFT). Note this SFrFT is different the simplified FrFT proposed in [21]. The SFrFT is also a linear transform and continuous in the angle α. This provides us a powerful tool for detecting SAR moving targets, particularly when there are multiple moving targets.
3 ThreeAntenna DPCABased SAR Operation Scheme
3.1 Background
Consider an ATI SAR (see Figure 2) consists of two antennas moving along the azimuth direction X and suppose that the two antennas are separated along the azimuth direction. For simplicity and without loss of generality, we assume that there are two interfering point targets, one moving and one stationary. Suppose they are perfectly compressed in the two SAR images, the signals reflected from the moving target and received by the two antennas can be expressed, respectively, by [15]
where A_{ ti }is the combined gain with azimuthcompression gain and backscatter coefficient, (X_{ ti }, Y_{ ti }) is the target position in the imaged images, λ is wavelength, and R_{ ti }is the instantaneous slant range modified by convolving with the azimuth reference function. Note that in an actual system the moving point target cannot be well focused with the stationaryterrain matched filter. Similarly, the signals reflected from the stationary target and received by the two antennas are
Suppose the two point targets are overlaped with each other, i.e., X_{ ti }= X_{ ci }and Y_{ ti }= Y_{ ci }, after registering the SAR image interferometric processing yields
where * denotes a conjugate operator. The first term is the moving target's interferogram that we are wanted. The second term is the stationary target's interferogram. Its phase should be equal to zero because a stationary scene does not change with time, i.e., R_{c 1}= R_{c 2}. The remaining two terms are crossterms, which come from the clutter contamination at the SAR image formation stage. As the phase angle is 2π periodic, the two crossterms may have different phase values; hence, the effects of crossterms on the total alongtrack interferometric phase are not easily predictable.
As ATI SAR output is signal power, slowly moving targets will not attenuated along with the stationary clutter when we utilize magnitude and phase information for target extraction. In the case of low signaltoclutter ratio (SCR), the ATI SAR will lose its ability to detect slowly moving targets and to correctly estimate their velocities because the system noise (additive thermal noise and multiplicative radar phase noise) scatters the stationary clutter signal around the real axis in the complex plane. If the clutter contribution is not negligible when compared to the signal power, the estimation of the target radial velocity from the contaminated interferometric phase may lead to erroneous results. When the SCR is small, this effect will become more serious for slowly moving targets and the moving targets will be indistinguishable from the clutter. Moreover, in this case, the targets' impulse responses are not normal delta functions, particularly for the moving targets which are poorly focused because of the unmatched azimuthcompression filter. This leads to a point target's response overlaps with several neighboring resolution cells. This also means a varying SCR across the target's response, which in turn affects its interferometric phase. Therefore, the ATI SAR is a clutter limited moving targets detector and applying some efficient clutter suppression or cancelation techniques is necessary.
3.2 ThreeAntenna ATI SAR Scheme
To improve the performance of slowly moving targets detection, it is necessary to apply some clutter suppression or cancelation suppression techniques. The DPCA is just proposed for this aim, which synthesizes a static antenna system allowing cancelation of static returns on a pulsetopulse basis. However, for the twoantenna DPCA system, after clutter cancelation it can not be used to locate the moving targets. As such, this article uses one threeantenna DPCA SAR scheme, as shown in Figure 3. An antenna of length L is used as a single aperture in transmission and is split into three receiving subapertures in reception. In this case, the receive phase centers are displaced in the alongtrack direction by L/3. It is then effective to define the 'twoway' phase centers as the midpoints between the phase center of the whole transmit antenna and the phase center of the receive subapertures. So, all goes as if the radar samples were collected by the transmit and receive antennas with phase centers colocated in the twoway phase centers. To reach aim, it is assumed that the pulse repeated frequency (PRF) is matched to the platform velocity and the distance between the three receive subaperture phase centers. Under this condition, the twoway phase center of the trailing subaperture occupies the same location of the twoway phase center of the leading subaperture one pulse repetition interval (PRI) later.
When the DPCA condition is matched, the clutter cancelation can then be performed by subtracting the samples of the radar returns received by twoway phase centers in the same spatial position, which are temporally displaced. The radar returns corresponding to stationary objects like the clutter from natural scenes are canceled, while the returns backscattered by moving targets have a different phase in the two acquisitions and remain uncanceled. Therefore, all static clutter scatterers are canceled, leaving only moving targets and a much simplified target detection problem (which is detailed in the next section). If the DPCA condition is not matched, the collected azimuth samples will be spaced nonuniformly. This problem can be solved using the reconstruction filtering algorithm detailed in [22].
3.3 Signal Models
We make the assumptions of farfield, flat earth, free space, and single polarization for our model. Although DPCA SAR can be realized with airborne and spaceborne platforms, we restrict ourselves to airborne platform only. Figure 4 shows the geometry of the threeantenna DPCAbased moving target detection (MTD) system. The platform altitude and velocity are h and v_{ a }, respectively.
The range history from the central aperture to a specific moving target located in (x_{ o }, y_{ o }) with velocity (v_{ x }, v_{ y }) can be represented by
where t_{ a }is the azimuth time, and
In an alike manner, the range histories of the left aperture and the right aperture can be represented, respectively, by
with d = L/3. Suppose the transmitted radar signal is
where T_{ p }is the pulse duration, f_{ c }is the carrier frequency, k_{ r }is the chirp rate, and t_{ r }is the range time. After range compressing the threeantenna SAR data, we have [23]
where ξ_{l} = (R_{ l }(t_{ a }) + R_{ c }(t_{ a }))/c_{ o }, ξ_{ c }= 2R_{ c }(t_{ a })/c_{ o }and ξ_{ r }= (R_{ c }(t_{ a }) + R_{ r }(t_{ a }))/c_{ o }, with c_{ o }is the speed of light.
To cancel the clutter, we perform
where t_{ d }= d/v_{ a }is the relative azimuth delay between two apertures, and G_{1} is used to compensate the corresponding phase shift
where λ is the carrier wavelength. As there is
Equation (19a) can be expanded into [24]
From Eq. (22) we can notice that, if v_{ y }= 0, there is S_{ cl }(t_{ r },t_{ a }) = 0; hence, the clutter has been successfully canceled by this method. The remaining problem is to detect the moving targets.
From Eq. (22) we can derived that its Doppler frequency center and Doppler chirp rate are represented, respectively, by
Then, equation (22) can be rewritten as
where
Thus, once the Doppler parameters described in the Eq. (25) are estimated, the target velocity (v_{ x },v_{ y }) can then be determined from the Eqs. (23) and (24).
To utilize the ATI technique, after compensating the phase terms caused by the relative aperture displace between S_{ cl }(t_{ r }, t_{ a }) and S_{ cr }(t_{ r }, t_{ a }) by multiplying
From Eq. (19b) we have
with
Then S_{ cl }(t_{ r }, t_{ a }) and S_{ rc }(t_{ r }, t_{ a }) can be interfered with each other by conjugate multiplication
where * is the complex conjugate operator, and Φ is the interferometric phase. The azimuth position of the moving target can be determined by
As the velocity of the moving target is relative small, from Eq. (13) R_{ o }can be approximated by
where
As there is  W_{ a }/2 ≥ x_{ o }≤ W_{ a }/2, W_{ a }≫ d with W_{ a }is the synthetic aperture length in azimuth, the interferometric phase is limited by
The interferometric phase Φ ∈ [π, π] is unambiguous; hence, the unambiguous x_{ o }can be obtained in this way. Once R_{ o }and x_{ o }are determined, the y_{ o }can then be derived from the Eq. (14) because the h is known from the inboard motion sensors.
4 SFrFTBased Moving Target Detection
To estimate the Doppler parameters, applying the SFrFT to the Eq. (20), we get
It arrives its maximum at [19]
This condition forms the basis for estimating the moving targets' parameters. In the SFrFT domain with a proper α, the spectra of any strong moving target will concentrate to a narrow impulse, and that of the clutter will be spread. If we can construct a narrow bandstop filter in the SFrFT domain whose center frequency around at the center of the narrowband spectrum of a strong moving target, then the signal component of this moving target can be extracted from the initial signal. With this method, the strong moving targets can be extracted iteratively, thereafter the weak moving targets may be detectable. This method can be regarded as an extension of the CLEAN algorithm [25] to the SFrFT.
Therefore, after canceling the stationary clutter, the identification of moving targets can be implemented with SFrFT in the following steps:
Step 1. Apply one SFrFT to the data in which the clutter has been canceled with different α, and from the maximal peak get the numerical estimation of $\left(\widehat{\mu},\widehat{\alpha}\right)$.
Step 2. Apply ${F}_{r}^{\widehat{\alpha}}$ to the same data, we have
Step 3. After identifying the first moving target, we then construct a narrow bandstop filter M(μ) to notch the narrow bandstop spectrum of this moving target
Step 4. The filtered signals are then rotated back to timedomain by an inverse SFrFT.
Step 5. Repeat the operations from Step 1 to Step 4 until all the desired moving targets are identified.
Once the Doppler parameters of each target are obtained, substituting them into Eq. (23), we can get the v_{ x }
In this step, since v_{ a }, x_{ o }, R_{ o }, λ and f_{ dc }are all known variables, the v_{ y }can be determined successfully. In a like manner, substitute Eq. (41) into Eq. (24), we can get the v_{ x }
Note that, here k_{ d }≤ 0 is assumed. Now, the parameters (v_{ x }, v_{ y }) and (x_{ o }, y_{ o }) are all determined successfully. Next, the moving targets can then be focused with one uniform image formation algorithm, such as RangeDoppler (RD) [26] and Chirp Scaling algorithms [27]. The corresponding processing steps are given in Figure 5.
4.1 Simulation Results
To evaluate the performance of the described processing algorithm, threeantenna DPCA stripmap SAR data from three point targets, one moving target and two stationary targets, are simulated using the parameters listed in Table 1. Figure 6 shows the processing results using the general rangeDoppler imaging algorithm. It can be noticed that the imaged moving target B is overlapped with the stationary target A. The moving target cannot be identified from this figure, because we cannot discern which is the moving one and which is the stationary one. Figure 7 shows the processing results after clutter cancelation by the DPCA operation. The clutter and static returns have been canceled successfully, leaving only moving targets and a much simplified target detection problem. However, the moving target is not focused due to the improper Doppler parameters used in the rangeDoppler imaging algorithm. Moreover, the imaged target position is also drifted. To focus the moving target, the accurate Doppler parameters are required.
Many algorithms considering linearly frequency modulated (LFM) signal detection, such as WignerVille distribution (WVD) and RadonWigner transform, have been proposed. These algorithms are developed primarily for detecting single LFM signal in noise. However, they may generate crossterms, particularly in the presence of multiple moving targets. Since crossterms tend to oscillate more rapidly in timefrequency plane than signal autocomponents, twodimensional smoothing suppresses crossterm artifacts at the expense of decreased localization. From Figure 8, we can notice that the results contain both autoterms and crossterms, which makes possible false detection (one more target is detected). In contrast, since FrFT is a linear transform, there will be no crossterms. We can easily locate the peak in the result of FrFT shown in Figure 9. From the peak we get (μ = 0.2567, α = 0.0092). Accordingly, the estimated Doppler parameters of the moving target are (k_{ d }= 17.34, f_{ dc }= 4.45). Using these estimated parameters, Figure 10 gives the corresponding imaging results. It is shown that the moving targets can be successfully focused in this way.
5 Discussions
In this article, the clutter cancelation is performed between two DPCA antennas. Hence, the clutter cancelation performance mainly depends on the correlation characteristics of the signals from fore and aft antennas. But phase center offset and antenna deformation may cause decorrelation. So, decorrelation analysis is necessary.
Suppose the clutter signals from the two DPCA antennas are represented by
where c_{ i }denotes clutter signals from the i th antenna, and n_{ i }denotes additive noise in the i th antenna. The covariance matrix between the two DPCA antennas can then be represented by
The multiplicative random phase noise that decorrelates the antenna 2 from the antenna 1 can be modeled as
where c_{1} is deterministic and φ is normally distributed. Suppose φ with a probability density function of $f\left(\phi \right)=N\left(0,{\sigma}_{\phi}^{2}\right)$, we can get
Then, Equation (44) can be further simplified as
where ρ is the correlation coefficient, which can be determined by [28]
Figure 11 shows several example correlation coefficients. We can notice that the decorrelation characteristics depend on both additive noise and multiplicative phase noise, but the DPCA clutter cancelation performance depends only on multiplicative phase noise. Thus, DPCA SAR detection performance is noise limited. In contrast, ATI SAR detection performance is clutter limited. In this article, the advantage of DPCA SAR and that of ATI SAR are combined; hence, the moving target detection performance can be improved.
6 Conclusion
In this article, one SFrFT and DPCA combined approach is proposed for GMTI applications. This approach realizes target location and velocity estimation with three antennas. After canceling by the three antennas, twochannel signals through which moving targets can be detected are formed. Next, the Doppler parameters of the moving targets are estimated with the SFrFT algorithm. Finally, the moving targets are focused with one uniform image formation algorithm. In this way, both target location and target velocity are acquired, and highresolution moving target SAR images are obtained. Simulation results show its validity. While compared to conventional approaches, this approach is more effective and robust. In particular, it is not dependent on a target's acrosstrack velocity component or its Doppler shift, which is difficult to determine due to insufficient freedom degrees. This approach depends only on target's Doppler rate, and this is shown to be measurable with a high degree of robustness. In contrast, the conventional approaches like ATI SAR depend not only on a target's Doppler rate but also on its acrosstrack velocity component. Moreover, the selection of matched filter length directly affects the measured ATI phase. These additional unknowns make the SAR ATI a less desirable method for estimating target parameters than the SFrFT and DPCA combined approach, which also allows the estimation of target's true azimuth position directly from its measured position in the final SAR images, particularly when there are multiple moving targets. Therefore, the SFrFT and DPCA combined method is elegant and effective in moving target identification.
References
 1.
Li G, Xia XG, Peng YN: Doppler keystone transform: an approach suitable for parallel implementation of SAR moving target imaging. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 2008,5(4):573577.
 2.
Wu D, Zhu DY, Zhu ZD: Knowledgeaided multichannel adaptive SAR/GMTI processing: algorithm and experimental results. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2010, 12. Article ID 164187
 3.
Bergin JS, Techau PM: Multiresolution signal processing techniques for ground moving target detection using airborne radar. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2006, 16. Article ID 47534
 4.
Page D, Owirka G: Knowledgeaided STAP processing for ground moving target indication radar using multilook data. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2006, 16. Article ID 74838
 5.
Wang WQ: An approach for multiple moving targets detection and velocity estimation. In Proceedings of IEEE Radar Conference. New York; 2006:749753.
 6.
Ender JHG, Gierull CH, Maori DC: Improved spacebased moving target indication via alternate transmission and receiver switching. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2008,46(12):39603974.
 7.
Li XM, Feng DZ, Liu HW, Xing MD, Luo D: Twodimensional pulsetopulse canceler of ground clutter in airborne radar. IET Radar, Sonar and Navigation 2009,3(2):133143. 10.1049/ietrsn:20080108
 8.
Budillon A, Pascazio V, Schirinzi G: Estimation of radial velocity of moving targets by alongtrack interferometric SAR systems. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 2008,5(3):349353.
 9.
Dong Z, Cai B, Liang DN: Detection of ground moving targets for twochannel spaceborne SARATI. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2010, 9. Article ID 230785
 10.
Yang L, Wang T, Bao Z: Ground moving target indication using an InSAR system with a hybrid baseline. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 2008,5(3):373377.
 11.
Guarbieri AM, Tebaldini S: On the exploitation of target statistics for SAR interferometry applications. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2008,46(11):34363443.
 12.
Romeiser R, Runge H, Suchandt S, Sprenger J, Weilbeer H, Sohrmann A, Stammer D: Current measurements in rivers by spaceborne alongtrack InSAR. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2007,45(12):40194031.
 13.
Romeiser R, Runge H: Theoretical evaluation of several possible alongtrack InSAR modes of TerraSARX for ocean current measurements. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2007,45(1):2135.
 14.
Chiu S, Dragosevic MV: Moving target indication via RADARSAT2 multichannel synthetic aperture. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2010, 19. Article ID 740130
 15.
Chiu S: Clutter effects on ground moving target velocity estimation with SAR alongtrack interferometry. In Proceedings of International IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Toulouse, France; 2003:13141319.
 16.
Durak A, Gierull CH: Clutter effects on the interferometric phase of ground moving targets. 2005.
 17.
Lombardo P, Colone F, Pastina D: Monitoring and surveillance potentialities obtained by splitting the antenna of the COSMOSkyMed SAR into multiple subapertures. IEE Proceedings on Radar, Sonar and Navigation 2006,153(2):104116. 10.1049/iprsn:20045122
 18.
Shui PL, Shang HY, Zhao YB: Instantaneous frequency estimation based on directionally smoothed pseudoWignerVill distribution bank. IET Radar, Sonar and Navigation 2007,1(4):317325. 10.1049/ietrsn:20060123
 19.
Wang WQ: Approach of multiple moving targets detection for microwave surveillance sensors. International Journal of Information Acquisition 2007,4(1):5768. 10.1142/S0219878907001162
 20.
Almeida LB: The fractional Fourier transform and timefrequency representations. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1992,42(10):30843091.
 21.
Pei SC, Ding JJ: Simplified fractional Fourier transform. J Opt Soc Amer 2000,17(13):23552367.
 22.
Gebert N, Krieger G, Moreira A: SAR signal reconstruction from nonuniform displaced phase centre sampling in the presence of perturbations. In Proceedings of IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Seoul, Kroea; 2005:10341037.
 23.
Wang WQ, Ding CB, Liang XD: Time and phase synchronization via directpath signal for bistatic synthetic aperture radar systems. IET Radar Sonar and Navigation 2008,2(1):111. 10.1049/ietrsn:20060097
 24.
Zheng MJ, Yang RL, Zhou JC: A new method of moving targets detection and imaging based on multiphase center antenna. Modern Radar In Chinese 2003,25(12):5557.
 25.
Tsao J, Steinber BD: Reduction of sidelobe and speckle artifacts in microwave imaging. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 1988,36(4):543556. 10.1109/8.1144
 26.
Neo YL, Wong FH, Cumming IG: Processing of azimuthinvariant bistatic SAR data using the range Doppler algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2008,46(1):1421.
 27.
Wong FH, Yeo TS: New applications of nonlinear chirp scaling in SAR data processing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2001,39(5):946953. 10.1109/36.921412
 28.
Chiu S, Livingstone C: A comparison of displaced phase centre antenna and alongtrack interferometry techniques for RADARSAT2 ground moving indication. Cana J Remote Sens 2005,33(1):2751.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the Specialized Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education for New Teachers under Contract number 200806141101, and the open funds of the Key Laboratory of Ocean Circulation and Waves, Chinese Academy of Sciences under contract number KLOCAW1004.
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, WQ. Moving Target Indication via ThreeAntenna SAR with Simplified Fractional Fourier Transform. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2011, 117 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/168761802011117
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Keywords
 Fractional Fourier transform (FrFT)
 Simplified FrFT
 Alongtrack interferometry (ATI)
 Displaced phase center antenna (DPCA)
 Ground moving targets detection (GMTD)
 Synthetic aperture radar (SAR)
 Threeantenna SAR